Fostering critical thinking skills among EFL learners in higher education - A systematic review

IF 4.5 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Sajidin
{"title":"Fostering critical thinking skills among EFL learners in higher education - A systematic review","authors":"Sajidin","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Equipping English-as-a-Foreign-Language (EFL) learners with critical thinking (CT) skills offers significant benefits for both their academic advancement and future careers. Due to its pivotal role in learners' lives, the pursuit of more effective interventions for developing CT skills among EFL learners remains ongoing. This study aims to examine how CT skills are fostered among EFL learners in higher education, as evidenced in published research. To achieve this, a secondary research method using the PRISMA systematic review framework was employed. The review systematically analyzed 47 published research articles selected from an initial search of 11,143 titles across eight online databases. The findings of the review are as follows. <em>First</em>, fostering CT skills in higher education has become a major concern among EFL educators and researchers in Asia. <em>Second</em>, the review highlights that both immersion and infusion approaches can effectively promote CT development, particularly when used in combination. Key strategies such as self-learning, discussion, and mentoring are central to these approaches, with a strong emphasis on collaborative learning and reflective practices. The duration of interventions plays a critical role: longer and more sustained programs tend to produce stronger outcomes. Additionally, the learning environment—whether traditional, web-based, or blended—impacts the effectiveness of CT interventions. Among these, blended learning consistently yields favorable results, suggesting that integrating in-class and online instruction is highly recommended. Finally, methodological factors generally enhance the outcomes of CT instruction. In contrast, personal factors (i.e., learner-related variables) can both support and hinder the development of CT skills, depending on context. Therefore, these factors may act as either enablers or inhibitors of CT skill acquisition under different conditions. This review proposes several educational implications to improve the cultivation of CT skills among EFL learners in higher education, focusing on instructional strategies, assessment methods, and learning resources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 101943"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187125001920","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Equipping English-as-a-Foreign-Language (EFL) learners with critical thinking (CT) skills offers significant benefits for both their academic advancement and future careers. Due to its pivotal role in learners' lives, the pursuit of more effective interventions for developing CT skills among EFL learners remains ongoing. This study aims to examine how CT skills are fostered among EFL learners in higher education, as evidenced in published research. To achieve this, a secondary research method using the PRISMA systematic review framework was employed. The review systematically analyzed 47 published research articles selected from an initial search of 11,143 titles across eight online databases. The findings of the review are as follows. First, fostering CT skills in higher education has become a major concern among EFL educators and researchers in Asia. Second, the review highlights that both immersion and infusion approaches can effectively promote CT development, particularly when used in combination. Key strategies such as self-learning, discussion, and mentoring are central to these approaches, with a strong emphasis on collaborative learning and reflective practices. The duration of interventions plays a critical role: longer and more sustained programs tend to produce stronger outcomes. Additionally, the learning environment—whether traditional, web-based, or blended—impacts the effectiveness of CT interventions. Among these, blended learning consistently yields favorable results, suggesting that integrating in-class and online instruction is highly recommended. Finally, methodological factors generally enhance the outcomes of CT instruction. In contrast, personal factors (i.e., learner-related variables) can both support and hinder the development of CT skills, depending on context. Therefore, these factors may act as either enablers or inhibitors of CT skill acquisition under different conditions. This review proposes several educational implications to improve the cultivation of CT skills among EFL learners in higher education, focusing on instructional strategies, assessment methods, and learning resources.
在高等教育中培养英语学习者的批判性思维能力——一个系统的回顾
让英语作为外语(EFL)的学习者具备批判性思维(CT)技能,对他们的学术进步和未来的职业生涯都有很大的好处。由于其在学习者生活中的关键作用,对发展英语学习者CT技能的更有效干预的追求仍在继续。本研究旨在探讨在高等教育中如何培养英语学习者的CT技能,已发表的研究证明了这一点。为了实现这一目标,采用了使用PRISMA系统评价框架的二次研究方法。该综述系统地分析了47篇已发表的研究文章,这些文章是从8个在线数据库的11143个标题中筛选出来的。审查的结果如下。首先,在高等教育中培养英语教学技能已成为亚洲英语教育者和研究者关注的主要问题。其次,综述强调浸泡和灌注两种方法都可以有效地促进CT的发展,特别是当两者结合使用时。诸如自学、讨论和指导等关键策略是这些方法的核心,并且非常强调协作学习和反思实践。干预措施的持续时间起着至关重要的作用:时间越长、持续时间越长,效果越好。此外,学习环境——无论是传统的、基于网络的还是混合的——都会影响CT干预的有效性。其中,混合式学习一直取得良好的效果,因此强烈建议将课堂教学与在线教学相结合。最后,方法因素通常会提高CT教学的效果。相比之下,个人因素(即与学习者相关的变量)既可以支持也可以阻碍CT技能的发展,这取决于环境。因此,在不同的条件下,这些因素可能是CT技能习得的促进因素或抑制因素。本文从教学策略、评估方法和学习资源三个方面提出了提高高等教育中英语学习者CT技能培养的教育意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信