Evaluation of Closely Spaced Infill Wells in Unconventional Mature Coalbed Methane Field: A Simulation Approach

IF 4.3 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
ACS Omega Pub Date : 2025-08-06 DOI:10.1021/acsomega.5c05150
Anand Raosaheb More*,  and , Samarth D. Patwardhan*, 
{"title":"Evaluation of Closely Spaced Infill Wells in Unconventional Mature Coalbed Methane Field: A Simulation Approach","authors":"Anand Raosaheb More*,&nbsp; and ,&nbsp;Samarth D. Patwardhan*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsomega.5c05150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This study presents the work carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of closely spaced infill wells in enhancing recovery from a mature coal bed methane (CBM) field. The primary objective was to assess the potential for increasing gas production rates, accelerating reserve monetization, and improving the overall recovery efficiency in an unconventional reservoir setting. The authors utilized an integrated approach combining core-hole data, geological and geophysical models, historical production performance, and a history-matched dynamic reservoir model to support technical decisions. A finely gridded cellular model was developed for numerical simulation, enabling detailed history matching over the entire production period. This allowed for a reliable evaluation of the infill well impact on reservoir dynamics and the remaining reserves of offset wells originally developed with wider well spacing. The study was applied to a distinct area within a mature CBM field, using data sets available in the public domain. Simulation results showed a strong correlation with the actual pilot infill well performance, validating the methodology. Quantitative outcomes demonstrated the tangible benefits of the infill strategy: a 30% plus increase in peak field gas rate, a 12% plus gain in recovery factor, a 2-fold acceleration in average reservoir pressure depletion, and a 1.5 to 2 times faster recovery of project capital expenditure. These improvements directly translate to more efficient resource utilization and better project economics. The work demonstrates how the application of a simulation-based approach combined with real field data can guide infill drilling strategies in unconventional CBM reservoirs. It offers a technically robust, cost-effective method to optimize late-life field development, while adhering to sound reservoir management principles.</p>","PeriodicalId":22,"journal":{"name":"ACS Omega","volume":"10 32","pages":"36559–36581"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsomega.5c05150","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Omega","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.5c05150","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents the work carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of closely spaced infill wells in enhancing recovery from a mature coal bed methane (CBM) field. The primary objective was to assess the potential for increasing gas production rates, accelerating reserve monetization, and improving the overall recovery efficiency in an unconventional reservoir setting. The authors utilized an integrated approach combining core-hole data, geological and geophysical models, historical production performance, and a history-matched dynamic reservoir model to support technical decisions. A finely gridded cellular model was developed for numerical simulation, enabling detailed history matching over the entire production period. This allowed for a reliable evaluation of the infill well impact on reservoir dynamics and the remaining reserves of offset wells originally developed with wider well spacing. The study was applied to a distinct area within a mature CBM field, using data sets available in the public domain. Simulation results showed a strong correlation with the actual pilot infill well performance, validating the methodology. Quantitative outcomes demonstrated the tangible benefits of the infill strategy: a 30% plus increase in peak field gas rate, a 12% plus gain in recovery factor, a 2-fold acceleration in average reservoir pressure depletion, and a 1.5 to 2 times faster recovery of project capital expenditure. These improvements directly translate to more efficient resource utilization and better project economics. The work demonstrates how the application of a simulation-based approach combined with real field data can guide infill drilling strategies in unconventional CBM reservoirs. It offers a technically robust, cost-effective method to optimize late-life field development, while adhering to sound reservoir management principles.

非常规成熟煤层气田密井充填评价:一种模拟方法
本研究介绍了为评价致密充填井在提高成熟煤层气(CBM)油田采收率方面的有效性而开展的工作。主要目的是评估在非常规油藏环境中提高天然气产量、加速储量货币化和提高整体采收率的潜力。作者采用了一种综合方法,将岩心井数据、地质和地球物理模型、历史生产动态以及历史匹配的动态油藏模型相结合,以支持技术决策。为数值模拟开发了精细网格元胞模型,实现了整个生产周期的详细历史匹配。这可以可靠地评估填充井对储层动态的影响,以及最初采用更宽井距开发的邻井的剩余储量。该研究应用于成熟煤层气油田的一个独特区域,使用了公共领域的数据集。模拟结果表明,该方法与实际的先导填充井性能具有很强的相关性,验证了该方法的有效性。定量结果证明了该充填策略的切实效益:峰值产气率提高30%以上,采收率提高12%以上,平均油藏压力衰竭速度加快2倍,项目资本支出回收速度加快1.5至2倍。这些改进直接转化为更有效的资源利用和更好的项目经济效益。该工作证明了如何将基于模拟的方法与实际现场数据相结合,指导非常规煤层气储层的填充钻井策略。它提供了一种技术可靠、经济高效的方法来优化油田后期开发,同时坚持良好的油藏管理原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Omega
ACS Omega Chemical Engineering-General Chemical Engineering
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
3945
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: ACS Omega is an open-access global publication for scientific articles that describe new findings in chemistry and interfacing areas of science, without any perceived evaluation of immediate impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信