A Social Cognitive Approach to Improving Stress and Anxiety Management Among Student Pharmacists

IF 3.5 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Sean R. King , Jeffrey S. Hallam , Virginia E. Schwindt
{"title":"A Social Cognitive Approach to Improving Stress and Anxiety Management Among Student Pharmacists","authors":"Sean R. King ,&nbsp;Jeffrey S. Hallam ,&nbsp;Virginia E. Schwindt","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the impact of a social cognitive theory (SCT)-based intervention incorporating destructive therapy as a novel approach to assisting student pharmacists in better managing mental health challenges.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This investigation, conducted during the Spring 2023 semester, utilized a pretest-post-test, control group design to examine the effects of an SCT-based intervention incorporating destructive therapy on perceived stress, general anxiety, situational perception, outcome expectations, and self-efficacy among student pharmacists. The perceived stress scale-10, general anxiety disorder scale-7, and items developed to measure select SCT constructs were used to assess the intervention’s impact. The month-long intervention was delivered to experimental group members (<em>n</em> = 30) and consisted of 3 weekly lunch-and-learn seminars and a 10-minute session of destructive therapy. Learning activities conducted during the intervention were designed to elicit change in the constructs. A random sample of students who opted not to join the intervention served as the control group (<em>n</em> = 32). Comparisons were made between groups for each post-test measure using analysis of covariance, with the corresponding pretest scores as covariate.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared with the control group, significant reductions in perceived stress and anxiety levels were observed in the intervention group. Results also indicated improved self-efficacy and situational perception within the intervention group. Significant differences were not observed for outcome expectations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Results suggest that interventions based on SCT incorporating destructive therapy may reduce stress and anxiety among student pharmacists, help them better recognize stress-inducing situations, and improve confidence in managing stress and anxiety. The role of destructive therapy within traditional behavioral health strategies is elucidated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"89 9","pages":"Article 101486"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945925001317","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the impact of a social cognitive theory (SCT)-based intervention incorporating destructive therapy as a novel approach to assisting student pharmacists in better managing mental health challenges.

Methods

This investigation, conducted during the Spring 2023 semester, utilized a pretest-post-test, control group design to examine the effects of an SCT-based intervention incorporating destructive therapy on perceived stress, general anxiety, situational perception, outcome expectations, and self-efficacy among student pharmacists. The perceived stress scale-10, general anxiety disorder scale-7, and items developed to measure select SCT constructs were used to assess the intervention’s impact. The month-long intervention was delivered to experimental group members (n = 30) and consisted of 3 weekly lunch-and-learn seminars and a 10-minute session of destructive therapy. Learning activities conducted during the intervention were designed to elicit change in the constructs. A random sample of students who opted not to join the intervention served as the control group (n = 32). Comparisons were made between groups for each post-test measure using analysis of covariance, with the corresponding pretest scores as covariate.

Results

Compared with the control group, significant reductions in perceived stress and anxiety levels were observed in the intervention group. Results also indicated improved self-efficacy and situational perception within the intervention group. Significant differences were not observed for outcome expectations.

Conclusion

Results suggest that interventions based on SCT incorporating destructive therapy may reduce stress and anxiety among student pharmacists, help them better recognize stress-inducing situations, and improve confidence in managing stress and anxiety. The role of destructive therapy within traditional behavioral health strategies is elucidated.
提高药学专业学生压力与焦虑管理的社会认知方法。
目的:评价以社会认知理论为基础,结合破坏性治疗的干预方法对帮助药学学生更好地应对心理健康挑战的影响。方法:本研究于2023年春季学期进行,采用前测后测、对照组设计,调查基于sct的干预结合破坏性治疗对药学学生感知压力、一般焦虑、情境感知、结果预期和自我效能感的影响。使用感知压力量表(PSS-10)、一般焦虑障碍量表(GAD-7)和为测量选择性SCT结构而开发的项目来评估干预措施的影响。为期一个月的干预被交付给实验组成员(n=30),包括三次每周一次的午餐和学习研讨会,以及一次10分钟的破坏性治疗。在干预期间进行的学习活动旨在引起构念的改变。选择不参加干预的随机学生样本作为对照组(n=32)。采用协方差分析,以相应的前测分数为协变量,对各后测测量值进行组间比较。结果:与对照组相比,干预组患者感知压力和焦虑水平显著降低。结果还表明,干预组的自我效能感和情境感知有所改善。结果预期没有观察到显著差异。结论:基于SCT结合破坏性治疗的干预措施可以减轻药学学生的压力和焦虑,帮助他们更好地识别压力诱发情况,提高管理压力和焦虑的信心。破坏性治疗在传统行为健康策略中的作用被阐明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信