Efficacy and moderators of isometric resistance training (IRT) on resting blood pressure among patients with pre- to established hypertension: a multilevel meta-review and regression analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Chengyu Zhou, Sijia Li, Zengyu Zhang, Jiamin Chen, Jian Song, Yongmin Xie, Zhuolin Tang, Aiguo Zhou
{"title":"Efficacy and moderators of isometric resistance training (IRT) on resting blood pressure among patients with pre- to established hypertension: a multilevel meta-review and regression analysis.","authors":"Chengyu Zhou, Sijia Li, Zengyu Zhang, Jiamin Chen, Jian Song, Yongmin Xie, Zhuolin Tang, Aiguo Zhou","doi":"10.1186/s13102-025-01286-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of isometric resistance training (IRT) in lowering blood pressure through meta-analyses, specifically systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP), in individuals with pre-hypertension to established hypertension. Additionally, it seeks to identify potential moderators that influence the blood pressure-lowering effects of IRT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in Web of Science (Core Collection), PubMed, Cochrane Library, and CNKI to identify studies employing a between-group design in individuals with pre-hypertension to established hypertension that assessed the effects of IRT on blood pressure. The initial search was performed in February 2024 and updated in May 2025. A multilevel meta-analysis was conducted to pool effect estimates for each outcome, reported as mean difference (MD) and standardized mean difference (SMD). Heterogeneity was examined using subgroup analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The present meta-review included 30 original studies, and meta- analysis results suggested compared to the control group, IRT significant reductions in SBP by 7.31 mmHg (SMD = -0.76, I² = 75%, moderate certainty of evidence), DBP by 3.90 mmHg (SMD = -0.54, I² = 48%, low certainty of evidence), and MAP by 5.94 mmHg (SMD = -0.92, I² = 53%, moderate certainty of evidence) among individuals with pre-hypertension to established hypertension (p < 0.01 for all). Sensitivity analysis confirmed that the above combined results were stable and there was no risk of publication bias. Subgroup analyses identified region, health status, medication use, training mode, interval duration, and frequency as significant moderators of IRT's effect on SBP, while BMI, interval duration, and frequency significantly moderated its effect on DBP (p < 0.05 for all). Meta-regression showed that SBP reduction was associated with age, female proportion, and training intensity (%MVC), with each 10% MVC increase in intensity linked to a ~ 2 mmHg SBP and ~ 1.3 mmHg MAP reduction in the range 10-60% MVC. For DBP, age was the only significant predictor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IRT was efficacious in reducing resting SBP, DBP, and MAP in individuals with pre-hypertension to established hypertension. The antihypertensive effects of IRT may be moderated by factors such as age, sex, medication status, baseline BP, and training variables (e.g., intensity, modality, recovery), underscoring the need for individualized and well-controlled applications in practice and research. A protocol recommends IRT at 30-60% MVC (gradually increase) or wall squat IRT at approximately 85%-95% HRpeak, performed 3-5 sessions per week for 14 min per session (4 × 2 min contractions with 2 min recovery).</p>","PeriodicalId":48585,"journal":{"name":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"17 1","pages":"243"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-025-01286-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of isometric resistance training (IRT) in lowering blood pressure through meta-analyses, specifically systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP), in individuals with pre-hypertension to established hypertension. Additionally, it seeks to identify potential moderators that influence the blood pressure-lowering effects of IRT.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in Web of Science (Core Collection), PubMed, Cochrane Library, and CNKI to identify studies employing a between-group design in individuals with pre-hypertension to established hypertension that assessed the effects of IRT on blood pressure. The initial search was performed in February 2024 and updated in May 2025. A multilevel meta-analysis was conducted to pool effect estimates for each outcome, reported as mean difference (MD) and standardized mean difference (SMD). Heterogeneity was examined using subgroup analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses.

Results: The present meta-review included 30 original studies, and meta- analysis results suggested compared to the control group, IRT significant reductions in SBP by 7.31 mmHg (SMD = -0.76, I² = 75%, moderate certainty of evidence), DBP by 3.90 mmHg (SMD = -0.54, I² = 48%, low certainty of evidence), and MAP by 5.94 mmHg (SMD = -0.92, I² = 53%, moderate certainty of evidence) among individuals with pre-hypertension to established hypertension (p < 0.01 for all). Sensitivity analysis confirmed that the above combined results were stable and there was no risk of publication bias. Subgroup analyses identified region, health status, medication use, training mode, interval duration, and frequency as significant moderators of IRT's effect on SBP, while BMI, interval duration, and frequency significantly moderated its effect on DBP (p < 0.05 for all). Meta-regression showed that SBP reduction was associated with age, female proportion, and training intensity (%MVC), with each 10% MVC increase in intensity linked to a ~ 2 mmHg SBP and ~ 1.3 mmHg MAP reduction in the range 10-60% MVC. For DBP, age was the only significant predictor.

Conclusion: IRT was efficacious in reducing resting SBP, DBP, and MAP in individuals with pre-hypertension to established hypertension. The antihypertensive effects of IRT may be moderated by factors such as age, sex, medication status, baseline BP, and training variables (e.g., intensity, modality, recovery), underscoring the need for individualized and well-controlled applications in practice and research. A protocol recommends IRT at 30-60% MVC (gradually increase) or wall squat IRT at approximately 85%-95% HRpeak, performed 3-5 sessions per week for 14 min per session (4 × 2 min contractions with 2 min recovery).

等长阻力训练(IRT)对高血压患者静息血压的疗效和调节因素:一项多水平荟萃回顾和回归分析
目的:本研究旨在通过荟萃分析评估等长阻力训练(IRT)在高血压前期至高血压患者中的降压效果,特别是收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)和平均动脉压(MAP)。此外,它还试图确定影响IRT降血压效果的潜在调节因子。方法:在Web of Science (Core Collection)、PubMed、Cochrane Library和CNKI中进行系统检索,以确定在高血压前期至高血压患者中采用组间设计的研究,以评估IRT对血压的影响。最初的搜索于2024年2月进行,并于2025年5月进行了更新。对每个结果进行多水平荟萃分析,汇总效应估计,报告为平均差(MD)和标准化平均差(SMD)。采用亚组分析、meta回归和敏感性分析检验异质性。结果:本荟萃综述纳入了30项原始研究,荟萃分析结果表明,与对照组相比,IRT显著降低高血压前期至高血压患者的收缩压7.31 mmHg (SMD = -0.76, I²= 75%,证据确定性中等),舒张压降低3.90 mmHg (SMD = -0.54, I²= 48%,证据确定性低),MAP降低5.94 mmHg (SMD = -0.92, I²= 53%,证据确定性中等)(p)。IRT可有效降低高血压前期至高血压患者的静息收缩压、舒张压和MAP。IRT的降压作用可能受到年龄、性别、用药状况、基线血压和训练变量(如强度、方式、恢复)等因素的影响,强调在实践和研究中需要个性化和良好控制的应用。一个方案建议IRT在30-60% MVC(逐渐增加)或墙蹲IRT在大约85%-95% HRpeak,每周进行3-5次,每次14分钟(4 × 2分钟收缩和2分钟恢复)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
196
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation is an open access, peer reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of sports medicine and the exercise sciences, including rehabilitation, traumatology, cardiology, physiology, and nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信