Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction in a Private Clinic: Clinical Outcomes from 2013 to 2024.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Israel Medical Association Journal Pub Date : 2025-08-01
Rivi Haiat Factor, Hagit Ofir, Haim Kaplan
{"title":"Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction in a Private Clinic: Clinical Outcomes from 2013 to 2024.","authors":"Rivi Haiat Factor, Hagit Ofir, Haim Kaplan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of autologous breast reconstruction has been steadily increasing in recent years. Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction is considered the gold standard for breast reconstruction despite its demanding technical expertise, time intensiveness, and rigorous postoperative monitoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected data from 102 DIEP flaps utilized for breast reconstruction in 70 patients treated at private clinics between 2013 and 2024. All surgeries were performed by a single, experienced surgeon.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age at surgery was 42.2 ± 8 years. Immediate reconstructions were conducted in 34 patients (48%); 46% of patients had prior radiation therapy. Only one patient received adjuvant radiation therapy. Free DIEP flaps vascularized by one (53%), two (32%), or three (10%) perforators were preferentially anastomosed to the internal mammary vessels. One patient underwent a muscle-sparing procedure due to the absence of available perforators. Total flap failure occurred in four cases (3.9%), three occurred as a unilateral loss in patients who underwent bilateral reconstruction. Postoperative revisions of the microvascular anastomosis were performed in three patients, with successful flap salvage in two (67%). Fat necrosis was diagnosed in 26 breasts (25%), only a minority of cases required follow-up surgery. All patients were managed completely in a private clinic, with none requiring hospitalization in the public system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Free DIEP flap breast reconstruction necessitates meticulous surgical planning, a well-coordinated surgical team, and close postoperative monitoring. Nevertheless, this surgery can be safely and effectively performed in a private clinic setting, with complication rates comparable to that of the public setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":50268,"journal":{"name":"Israel Medical Association Journal","volume":"27 8","pages":"510-514"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Medical Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The incidence of autologous breast reconstruction has been steadily increasing in recent years. Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction is considered the gold standard for breast reconstruction despite its demanding technical expertise, time intensiveness, and rigorous postoperative monitoring.

Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 102 DIEP flaps utilized for breast reconstruction in 70 patients treated at private clinics between 2013 and 2024. All surgeries were performed by a single, experienced surgeon.

Results: The mean age at surgery was 42.2 ± 8 years. Immediate reconstructions were conducted in 34 patients (48%); 46% of patients had prior radiation therapy. Only one patient received adjuvant radiation therapy. Free DIEP flaps vascularized by one (53%), two (32%), or three (10%) perforators were preferentially anastomosed to the internal mammary vessels. One patient underwent a muscle-sparing procedure due to the absence of available perforators. Total flap failure occurred in four cases (3.9%), three occurred as a unilateral loss in patients who underwent bilateral reconstruction. Postoperative revisions of the microvascular anastomosis were performed in three patients, with successful flap salvage in two (67%). Fat necrosis was diagnosed in 26 breasts (25%), only a minority of cases required follow-up surgery. All patients were managed completely in a private clinic, with none requiring hospitalization in the public system.

Conclusions: Free DIEP flap breast reconstruction necessitates meticulous surgical planning, a well-coordinated surgical team, and close postoperative monitoring. Nevertheless, this surgery can be safely and effectively performed in a private clinic setting, with complication rates comparable to that of the public setting.

2013 - 2024年私人诊所腹壁深下穿支皮瓣乳房重建术的临床效果
背景:近年来自体乳房再造术的发病率稳步上升。深下腹穿支(DIEP)皮瓣重建被认为是乳房重建的金标准,尽管其技术要求高,时间密集,严格的术后监测。方法:我们回顾性收集2013年至2024年间在私人诊所接受治疗的70例患者的102例DIEP皮瓣用于乳房重建的数据。所有手术均由一位经验丰富的外科医生进行。结果:平均手术年龄42.2±8岁。34例患者(48%)立即重建;46%的患者曾接受过放射治疗。只有1例患者接受了辅助放射治疗。一个(53%)、两个(32%)或三个(10%)穿支血管化的游离DIEP皮瓣优先与乳腺内血管吻合。一名患者由于缺少可用的穿支而接受了肌肉保留手术。4例(3.9%)发生全皮瓣失败,3例在双侧重建患者中发生单侧皮瓣丢失。3例患者进行了微血管吻合的术后修复,2例(67%)成功保留了皮瓣。26例(25%)乳房被诊断为脂肪坏死,只有少数病例需要随访手术。所有患者完全在一家私人诊所接受治疗,没有人需要在公共系统住院治疗。结论:游离DIEP皮瓣乳房再造术需要周密的手术计划、协调良好的手术团队和严密的术后监测。尽管如此,这种手术可以在私人诊所环境中安全有效地进行,并发症发生率与公共环境相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Israel Medical Association Journal
Israel Medical Association Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
54
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Israel Medical Association Journal (IMAJ), representing medical sciences and medicine in Israel, is published in English by the Israel Medical Association. The Israel Medical Association Journal (IMAJ) was initiated in 1999.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信