Recommendation of antibiotic prophylaxis in orthognathic surgery according to current microbial resistance, a retrospective analysis of 100 operated cases.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
P Sole, P Tapia, S Mordoh, M Carvajal, G Matus-Miranda, B Ossandón-Zuñiga
{"title":"Recommendation of antibiotic prophylaxis in orthognathic surgery according to current microbial resistance, a retrospective analysis of 100 operated cases.","authors":"P Sole, P Tapia, S Mordoh, M Carvajal, G Matus-Miranda, B Ossandón-Zuñiga","doi":"10.4317/medoral.27519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maxillofacial infections (MIs), particularly surgical site infections (SSIs) following orthognathic surgery, represent a significant clinical concern due to their potential severity and impact on treatment outcomes. Although antibiotic prophylaxis is standard practice, growing bacterial resistance-especially in penicillin-allergic patients-challenges the effectiveness of alternative regimens such as clindamycin.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed 100 consecutive patients who underwent orthognathic surgery between 2022 and 2023, performed by the same surgical team. All patients received standardized perioperative care, including hospitalization and intravenous (IV) antibiotic prophylaxis with cefazolin or clindamycin for those allergic to penicillin. The incidence of SSIs was evaluated and correlated with the type of antibiotic used. Microbial cultures and antibiograms were obtained from infected cases requiring surgical wound revision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 100 patients, 98 received prophylactic cefazolin and showed no SSIs. The remaining 2 patients, both allergic to penicillin and treated with IV clindamycin, developed SSIs within the first postoperative week. Both cases required surgical drainage, hospitalization, and culture-based antibiotic therapy. Pathogens isolated included Streptococcus mitis, S. oralis, S. constellatus, and Haemophilus parainfluenzae, all resistant to clindamycin and erythromycin but sensitive to beta-lactams and fluoroquinolones. Both patients responded favorably to ciprofloxacin and metronidazole.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights a significant risk of infection associated with clindamycin prophylaxis in penicillin-allergic patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. Cefazolin proved effective in preventing SSIs. These findings underscore the urgent need for updated, evidence-based prophylactic protocols in maxillofacial surgery, particularly for patients with beta-lactam allergies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49016,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.27519","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Maxillofacial infections (MIs), particularly surgical site infections (SSIs) following orthognathic surgery, represent a significant clinical concern due to their potential severity and impact on treatment outcomes. Although antibiotic prophylaxis is standard practice, growing bacterial resistance-especially in penicillin-allergic patients-challenges the effectiveness of alternative regimens such as clindamycin.

Material and methods: This retrospective study analyzed 100 consecutive patients who underwent orthognathic surgery between 2022 and 2023, performed by the same surgical team. All patients received standardized perioperative care, including hospitalization and intravenous (IV) antibiotic prophylaxis with cefazolin or clindamycin for those allergic to penicillin. The incidence of SSIs was evaluated and correlated with the type of antibiotic used. Microbial cultures and antibiograms were obtained from infected cases requiring surgical wound revision.

Results: Of the 100 patients, 98 received prophylactic cefazolin and showed no SSIs. The remaining 2 patients, both allergic to penicillin and treated with IV clindamycin, developed SSIs within the first postoperative week. Both cases required surgical drainage, hospitalization, and culture-based antibiotic therapy. Pathogens isolated included Streptococcus mitis, S. oralis, S. constellatus, and Haemophilus parainfluenzae, all resistant to clindamycin and erythromycin but sensitive to beta-lactams and fluoroquinolones. Both patients responded favorably to ciprofloxacin and metronidazole.

Conclusions: This study highlights a significant risk of infection associated with clindamycin prophylaxis in penicillin-allergic patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. Cefazolin proved effective in preventing SSIs. These findings underscore the urgent need for updated, evidence-based prophylactic protocols in maxillofacial surgery, particularly for patients with beta-lactam allergies.

根据当前微生物耐药性推荐正颌手术抗生素预防,回顾性分析100例手术病例。
背景:颌面部感染(MIs),特别是手术部位感染(ssi)在正颌手术后,由于其潜在的严重性和对治疗结果的影响,代表了一个重要的临床关注。虽然抗生素预防是标准做法,但细菌耐药性的增长——尤其是在青霉素过敏患者中——对克林霉素等替代方案的有效性提出了挑战。材料和方法:本回顾性研究分析了同一外科团队在2022年至2023年期间连续接受正颌手术的100例患者。所有患者都接受了标准化的围手术期护理,包括住院治疗和对青霉素过敏的患者静脉注射头孢唑林或克林霉素预防抗生素。评估了ssi的发生率,并与使用的抗生素类型相关。从需要手术修复伤口的感染病例中获得微生物培养和抗生素图。结果:100例患者中,98例接受预防性头孢唑林治疗,未出现ssi。其余2例患者均对青霉素过敏并静脉注射克林霉素,术后1周内发生ssi。这两个病例都需要手术引流、住院和基于培养的抗生素治疗。分离到的病原体包括链球菌、口腔链球菌、星座链球菌和副流感嗜血杆菌,均对克林霉素和红霉素耐药,但对-内酰胺类和氟喹诺酮类药物敏感。两例患者对环丙沙星和甲硝唑均有良好反应。结论:本研究强调了在接受正颌手术的青霉素过敏患者中,克林霉素预防与感染相关的显著风险。头孢唑林被证明对预防ssi有效。这些发现强调迫切需要更新的、基于证据的颌面外科预防方案,特别是对β -内酰胺过敏患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal
Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: 1. Oral Medicine and Pathology: Clinicopathological as well as medical or surgical management aspects of diseases affecting oral mucosa, salivary glands, maxillary bones, as well as orofacial neurological disorders, and systemic conditions with an impact on the oral cavity. 2. Oral Surgery: Surgical management aspects of diseases affecting oral mucosa, salivary glands, maxillary bones, teeth, implants, oral surgical procedures. Surgical management of diseases affecting head and neck areas. 3. Medically compromised patients in Dentistry: Articles discussing medical problems in Odontology will also be included, with a special focus on the clinico-odontological management of medically compromised patients, and considerations regarding high-risk or disabled patients. 4. Implantology 5. Periodontology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信