Modification of nursing-initiated standing order sets results in a nonsignificant decline in inappropriate urinalyses in an adult emergency department.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Eugene W Liu, Richelle L Guerrero-Wooley, Anna Y Zhou, James M Pappas
{"title":"Modification of nursing-initiated standing order sets results in a nonsignificant decline in inappropriate urinalyses in an adult emergency department.","authors":"Eugene W Liu, Richelle L Guerrero-Wooley, Anna Y Zhou, James M Pappas","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inappropriate treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria with antimicrobials is widespread in health care facilities and promotes antibiotic resistance. We assessed the degree urinalysis is ordered in absence of urinary symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly sampled 97 unique patients with urinalyses (UAs) obtained in the Emergency Department in 2022 and reviewed their charts to determine if UAs were ordered according to society guideline-based indications. To identify risk factors for inappropriate ordering, we performed simple logistic regression between patients with inappropriately versus appropriately obtained urinalysis by various demographic factors. Following an intervention where nursing order sets were modified to reflect appropriate urinalysis usage, we reassessed the appropriateness of UAs in a sample of 95 unique patients within 6months postintervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preintervention, 65% (95% CI, 54.1%-74.5%) of patients had inappropriately ordered UAs. Postintervention, we noted a nonsignificant decrease to 52% (42.0%-62.4%; χ<sup>2</sup> = 2.8, P = .095) of inappropriately ordered UAs. Postintervention, Hispanic ethnicity was negatively associated with inappropriately obtained UAs (OR 0.30; 0.12-0.71).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most UAs remained inappropriately ordered despite a change in nursing order sets. Our results suggest provider-patient interactions are the major driver of inappropriately obtained UAs. The negative association with inappropriately obtained UAs in Hispanics suggests acuity of disease may influence this interaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2025.08.007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inappropriate treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria with antimicrobials is widespread in health care facilities and promotes antibiotic resistance. We assessed the degree urinalysis is ordered in absence of urinary symptoms.

Methods: We randomly sampled 97 unique patients with urinalyses (UAs) obtained in the Emergency Department in 2022 and reviewed their charts to determine if UAs were ordered according to society guideline-based indications. To identify risk factors for inappropriate ordering, we performed simple logistic regression between patients with inappropriately versus appropriately obtained urinalysis by various demographic factors. Following an intervention where nursing order sets were modified to reflect appropriate urinalysis usage, we reassessed the appropriateness of UAs in a sample of 95 unique patients within 6months postintervention.

Results: Preintervention, 65% (95% CI, 54.1%-74.5%) of patients had inappropriately ordered UAs. Postintervention, we noted a nonsignificant decrease to 52% (42.0%-62.4%; χ2 = 2.8, P = .095) of inappropriately ordered UAs. Postintervention, Hispanic ethnicity was negatively associated with inappropriately obtained UAs (OR 0.30; 0.12-0.71).

Conclusions: Most UAs remained inappropriately ordered despite a change in nursing order sets. Our results suggest provider-patient interactions are the major driver of inappropriately obtained UAs. The negative association with inappropriately obtained UAs in Hispanics suggests acuity of disease may influence this interaction.

在成人急诊科,修改护士发起的常备命令集导致不适当尿液分析的不显著下降。
背景:在卫生保健机构中,不适当地使用抗菌素治疗无症状细菌尿是普遍存在的,并促进了抗生素耐药性。我们评估了在没有泌尿系统症状的情况下进行尿液分析的程度。方法:我们随机抽取2022年在急诊科获得的97例独特的尿液分析患者,并审查他们的图表,以确定是否根据社会指南为基础的适应症进行尿液分析。为了确定不适当排序的危险因素,我们对不同人口统计因素的患者进行了简单的logistic回归。在对护理单进行修改以反映适当的尿液分析使用的干预后,我们在干预后6个月内对95例独特患者样本进行了尿液分析的适当性重新评估。结果:干预前,65% (95% CI, 54.1-74.5%)的患者尿检顺序不当。干预后,我们注意到无显著性下降至52% (42.0-62.4%;χ2=2.8, p=0.095)。干预后,西班牙裔与不适当获得的尿液分析呈负相关(OR 0.30;0.12 - -0.71)。结论:尽管护理单的设置发生了变化,但大多数尿检仍然排序不当。我们的结果表明,提供者与患者的互动是不适当获得尿液分析的主要驱动因素。在西班牙裔患者中,不适当获得的尿液分析结果与此呈负相关,表明疾病的敏锐度可能影响这种相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
479
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信