Texture and Color Enhanced Imaging in the Diagnosis of Colonic Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Analysis

IF 1.5 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
JGH Open Pub Date : 2025-08-17 DOI:10.1002/jgh3.70191
Ciaran Judge, David Law, Glynis Jones, Sherman Picardo, Krish Ragunath
{"title":"Texture and Color Enhanced Imaging in the Diagnosis of Colonic Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Analysis","authors":"Ciaran Judge,&nbsp;David Law,&nbsp;Glynis Jones,&nbsp;Sherman Picardo,&nbsp;Krish Ragunath","doi":"10.1002/jgh3.70191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Image enhanced endoscopy (IEE) can augment the detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and its precursor lesions, potentially reducing incidence and mortality. Early data on texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI) support its use for neoplasia screening. This study aimed to systematically review and perform a meta-analysis to assess the impact of TXI on colonic adenoma detection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. Studies comparing TXI with white light imaging (WLI) were eligible for inclusion. Searches were conducted through relevant databases and major conferences up to July 1, 2024. The primary outcome was ADR, with secondary outcomes including polyp detection rate (PDR), mean number of adenomas per patient (MAP), and size, location, morphology, and withdrawal time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>From 1270 results, 4 studies were included in the meta-analysis (<i>n</i> = 5481). TXI significantly increased ADR compared to WLI (55.8% vs. 47.8%, RR 1.24, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), PDR (63.7% vs. 54.7%, RR 1.23, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and MAP (mean difference 0.41, <i>p</i> = 0.005). and improved detection of proximal lesions (MD 0.21, 95% CI [0.15–0.27], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%). Pooled withdrawal times were not different between groups, with no differences between endoscopist experience or quality of bowel preparation, where reported. Sub-analysis further demonstrated superiority of TXI, with an absolute difference in ADR of 14.2%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>TXI significantly improves ADR, PDR, and MAP compared to WLI, highlighting its potential to enhance CRC screening efficacy without impact from user experience, bowel prep, or withdrawal times. TXI is a useful and practical adjunct to enhance the detection of colonic neoplasia.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45861,"journal":{"name":"JGH Open","volume":"9 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgh3.70191","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JGH Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgh3.70191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Image enhanced endoscopy (IEE) can augment the detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and its precursor lesions, potentially reducing incidence and mortality. Early data on texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI) support its use for neoplasia screening. This study aimed to systematically review and perform a meta-analysis to assess the impact of TXI on colonic adenoma detection.

Methods

The systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. Studies comparing TXI with white light imaging (WLI) were eligible for inclusion. Searches were conducted through relevant databases and major conferences up to July 1, 2024. The primary outcome was ADR, with secondary outcomes including polyp detection rate (PDR), mean number of adenomas per patient (MAP), and size, location, morphology, and withdrawal time.

Results

From 1270 results, 4 studies were included in the meta-analysis (n = 5481). TXI significantly increased ADR compared to WLI (55.8% vs. 47.8%, RR 1.24, p < 0.001), PDR (63.7% vs. 54.7%, RR 1.23, p < 0.001), and MAP (mean difference 0.41, p = 0.005). and improved detection of proximal lesions (MD 0.21, 95% CI [0.15–0.27], p < 0.001, I2 = 0%). Pooled withdrawal times were not different between groups, with no differences between endoscopist experience or quality of bowel preparation, where reported. Sub-analysis further demonstrated superiority of TXI, with an absolute difference in ADR of 14.2%.

Conclusion

TXI significantly improves ADR, PDR, and MAP compared to WLI, highlighting its potential to enhance CRC screening efficacy without impact from user experience, bowel prep, or withdrawal times. TXI is a useful and practical adjunct to enhance the detection of colonic neoplasia.

Abstract Image

纹理和彩色增强成像在结肠肿瘤诊断中的应用:系统回顾和分析
图像增强内窥镜(IEE)可以增强对结直肠癌(CRC)及其前驱病变的检测,潜在地降低发病率和死亡率。纹理和彩色增强成像(TXI)的早期数据支持其用于肿瘤筛查。本研究旨在系统回顾并进行荟萃分析,以评估TXI对结肠腺瘤检测的影响。方法按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。比较TXI与白光成像(WLI)的研究符合纳入条件。检索通过相关数据库和主要会议进行,截止到2024年7月1日。主要结局是不良反应,次要结局包括息肉检出率(PDR)、每位患者平均腺瘤数量(MAP)、大小、位置、形态和停药时间。从1270项结果中,有4项研究被纳入meta分析(n = 5481)。与WLI相比,TXI显著增加了不良反应(55.8%比47.8%,RR 1.24, p < 0.001), PDR(63.7%比54.7%,RR 1.23, p < 0.001)和MAP(平均差异0.41,p = 0.005)。提高近端病变的检出率(MD = 0.21, 95% CI [0.15-0.27], p < 0.001, I2 = 0%)。合并停药时间在两组之间没有差异,内镜医师经验或肠道准备质量之间也没有差异。亚分析进一步证实了TXI的优越性,其不良反应的绝对差异为14.2%。结论与WLI相比,TXI显著改善了ADR、PDR和MAP,突出了其在不影响用户体验、肠道准备或停药时间的情况下提高CRC筛查效果的潜力。TXI是一种有用和实用的辅助手段,可以加强对结肠肿瘤的检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JGH Open
JGH Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信