Enhancing specific critical thinking skills among EFL learners through computer-assisted interactive reading model in a CALL environment: An investigation of learner perceptions and performance

IF 4.5 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Li Ran
{"title":"Enhancing specific critical thinking skills among EFL learners through computer-assisted interactive reading model in a CALL environment: An investigation of learner perceptions and performance","authors":"Li Ran","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the effectiveness of computer-assisted interactive reading models in fostering critical thinking skills among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. Despite the recognized importance of critical thinking in EFL education, traditional methods often fail to cultivate these skills, prompting exploration of technology-enhanced solutions. A pretest-posttest randomized controlled trial with 378 EFL learners evaluated three experimental interventions targeting analytical, creative, and logical thinking, compared to a control group receiving standard computer-assisted language learning (CALL) instruction. Over 11 weeks, participants engaged in 22 sessions utilizing interactive reading platforms with adaptive feedback and scaffolding features. Quantitative data from the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal and computer-assisted reading performance tests were analyzed using mixed ANOVA, while qualitative insights from surveys and semi-structured interviews underwent thematic analysis. Results demonstrated significant improvements in critical thinking skills across experimental groups (η² = 0.886–.947), with the analytical intervention showing superior gains in inferential reasoning and argument evaluation (ΔM = +68.35 reading performance, ΔM = +19.93 critical thinking). Qualitative findings revealed high learner engagement (<em>M</em> = 5.5–5.9 on 7-point scales) and perceived effectiveness, though technical challenges and cognitive load emerged as moderating factors. The study establishes analytical scaffolding through interactive reading models as an effective strategy for developing higher-order cognitive skills, bridging theoretical frameworks in cognitive psychology and educational technology. Practical implications emphasize integrating visual organizers and adaptive feedback in CALL curricula, while addressing infrastructural barriers to implementation. Limitations include sample homogeneity and cross-sectional design, suggesting the need for longitudinal replications across diverse educational contexts. This research advances evidence-based strategies for cultivating 21st-century competencies in technology-enhanced language education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101948"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187118712500197X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of computer-assisted interactive reading models in fostering critical thinking skills among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. Despite the recognized importance of critical thinking in EFL education, traditional methods often fail to cultivate these skills, prompting exploration of technology-enhanced solutions. A pretest-posttest randomized controlled trial with 378 EFL learners evaluated three experimental interventions targeting analytical, creative, and logical thinking, compared to a control group receiving standard computer-assisted language learning (CALL) instruction. Over 11 weeks, participants engaged in 22 sessions utilizing interactive reading platforms with adaptive feedback and scaffolding features. Quantitative data from the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal and computer-assisted reading performance tests were analyzed using mixed ANOVA, while qualitative insights from surveys and semi-structured interviews underwent thematic analysis. Results demonstrated significant improvements in critical thinking skills across experimental groups (η² = 0.886–.947), with the analytical intervention showing superior gains in inferential reasoning and argument evaluation (ΔM = +68.35 reading performance, ΔM = +19.93 critical thinking). Qualitative findings revealed high learner engagement (M = 5.5–5.9 on 7-point scales) and perceived effectiveness, though technical challenges and cognitive load emerged as moderating factors. The study establishes analytical scaffolding through interactive reading models as an effective strategy for developing higher-order cognitive skills, bridging theoretical frameworks in cognitive psychology and educational technology. Practical implications emphasize integrating visual organizers and adaptive feedback in CALL curricula, while addressing infrastructural barriers to implementation. Limitations include sample homogeneity and cross-sectional design, suggesting the need for longitudinal replications across diverse educational contexts. This research advances evidence-based strategies for cultivating 21st-century competencies in technology-enhanced language education.
通过计算机辅助互动阅读模式在CALL环境中提高英语学习者的特定批判性思维技能:一项关于学习者感知和表现的调查
本研究探讨了计算机辅助互动阅读模式在培养英语学习者批判性思维能力方面的有效性。尽管批判性思维在英语教学中的重要性得到了公认,但传统方法往往无法培养这些技能,这促使人们探索技术增强的解决方案。与接受标准计算机辅助语言学习(CALL)教学的对照组相比,一项有378名英语学习者参加的测试前-测试后随机对照试验评估了针对分析、创造性和逻辑思维的三种实验干预措施。在11周的时间里,参与者利用具有自适应反馈和脚手架功能的互动阅读平台进行了22次会话。来自沃森-格拉泽批判性思维评估和计算机辅助阅读表现测试的定量数据使用混合方差分析进行分析,而来自调查和半结构化访谈的定性见解进行了主题分析。结果表明,实验组的批判性思维能力有显著提高(η²= 0.886 - 0.947),分析干预在推理推理和论点评估方面表现出更大的进步(ΔM = +68.35阅读表现,ΔM = +19.93批判性思维)。定性研究结果显示,学习者参与度高(7分制M = 5.5-5.9),感知效率高,但技术挑战和认知负荷是调节因素。本研究通过互动阅读模型建立分析脚手架,作为发展高阶认知技能的有效策略,将认知心理学和教育技术的理论框架连接起来。实际意义强调在CALL课程中整合视觉组织者和自适应反馈,同时解决实施的基础设施障碍。局限性包括样本同质性和横断面设计,这表明需要在不同的教育背景下进行纵向重复。本研究提出了在技术增强的语言教育中培养21世纪能力的循证策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信