Informing soil compaction research priorities with farmer focus groups in the United States

Natalie Sturm , Kelly R. Wilson , Haly L. Neely , Aaron Esser , Tim Waters , Reagan Noland , Jerry Clark , Natasha Paris , Jordan Kampa , Francisco Arriaga , David Drake
{"title":"Informing soil compaction research priorities with farmer focus groups in the United States","authors":"Natalie Sturm ,&nbsp;Kelly R. Wilson ,&nbsp;Haly L. Neely ,&nbsp;Aaron Esser ,&nbsp;Tim Waters ,&nbsp;Reagan Noland ,&nbsp;Jerry Clark ,&nbsp;Natasha Paris ,&nbsp;Jordan Kampa ,&nbsp;Francisco Arriaga ,&nbsp;David Drake","doi":"10.1016/j.soisec.2025.100200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil compaction is a widespread form of soil degradation that impacts soil functions and ecosystem services by limiting plant growth, reducing farm profitability, and impeding efforts to improve soil health. While mechanisms by which soil compaction occurs are widely understood, little has improved regarding its management in agroecosystems in the last century. Here, to better inform scientists of farmers’ soil compaction research needs, we implemented focus groups in six growing regions across Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin. In each focus group, farmers completed surveys and participated in guided discussions centered on their soil compaction perceptions, experiences, and ideas. We evaluated surveys and discussion transcripts with quantitative (summary statistics) and qualitative (thematic coding) analyses to assess participants’ observations, questions, and possible management solutions. Results from this work indicate that knowledge gaps, especially regarding identification of critical thresholds for soil compaction at field scale and management options and their efficacies, influence farmers’ adoption of soil compaction management practices. Based on the needs identified in this study, key priorities for soil compaction research and education should include (1) techniques for assessing soil compaction at field scale, including both its presence and thresholds for management, (2) addressing knowledge gaps about controlled traffic farming, tillage, and crops, and (3) continued research and development of requested technologies and practices, including drones, amendments, and cover or perennial crops.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74839,"journal":{"name":"Soil security","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006225000255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil compaction is a widespread form of soil degradation that impacts soil functions and ecosystem services by limiting plant growth, reducing farm profitability, and impeding efforts to improve soil health. While mechanisms by which soil compaction occurs are widely understood, little has improved regarding its management in agroecosystems in the last century. Here, to better inform scientists of farmers’ soil compaction research needs, we implemented focus groups in six growing regions across Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin. In each focus group, farmers completed surveys and participated in guided discussions centered on their soil compaction perceptions, experiences, and ideas. We evaluated surveys and discussion transcripts with quantitative (summary statistics) and qualitative (thematic coding) analyses to assess participants’ observations, questions, and possible management solutions. Results from this work indicate that knowledge gaps, especially regarding identification of critical thresholds for soil compaction at field scale and management options and their efficacies, influence farmers’ adoption of soil compaction management practices. Based on the needs identified in this study, key priorities for soil compaction research and education should include (1) techniques for assessing soil compaction at field scale, including both its presence and thresholds for management, (2) addressing knowledge gaps about controlled traffic farming, tillage, and crops, and (3) continued research and development of requested technologies and practices, including drones, amendments, and cover or perennial crops.
告知土壤压实研究优先事项与农民焦点小组在美国
土壤压实是土壤退化的一种普遍形式,它通过限制植物生长、降低农场盈利能力和阻碍改善土壤健康的努力,影响土壤功能和生态系统服务。虽然人们普遍了解土壤压实发生的机制,但在上个世纪,农业生态系统对土壤压实的管理几乎没有改善。在这里,为了更好地让科学家了解农民的土壤压实研究需求,我们在德克萨斯州、华盛顿州和威斯康星州的六个种植区实施了焦点小组。在每个焦点小组中,农民完成调查,并参与以他们对土壤压实的看法、经验和想法为中心的指导讨论。我们用定量(汇总统计)和定性(专题编码)分析来评估调查和讨论记录,以评估参与者的观察、问题和可能的管理解决方案。这项工作的结果表明,知识差距,特别是在确定田间规模土壤压实的关键阈值和管理方案及其有效性方面,影响了农民采用土壤压实管理做法。根据本研究确定的需求,土壤压实研究和教育的关键优先事项应包括:(1)在田间规模上评估土壤压实的技术,包括其存在和管理阈值;(2)解决控制交通耕作、耕作和作物方面的知识差距;(3)继续研究和开发所需的技术和实践,包括无人机、修正、覆盖或多年生作物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil security
Soil security Soil Science
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
90 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信