Saleem Anwar, Sufia Khan, Iqbal Azmi, Khursheed Ul Islam, Tanveer Ahmad, Jawed Iqbal
{"title":"CRISPR-based molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2, its emerging variants, and diverse pathogens","authors":"Saleem Anwar, Sufia Khan, Iqbal Azmi, Khursheed Ul Islam, Tanveer Ahmad, Jawed Iqbal","doi":"10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2025.117062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pathogenic viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 (SCoV-2), continue to pose a significant threat to human civilization. The lessons learnt from SCoV-2 infections have highlighted the requirement for robust and readily available diagnostic tools in order to limit the virus transmission and prevent future pandemics such as COVID-19. RT-qPCR-based detection is routinely used for sensitive and accurate diagnosis, which requires a sophisticated instrument, laboratory setup, and technical expertise. Though RT-qPCR is highly reliable and considered the gold standard for pathogen detection, it is costly, time-consuming, and unaffordable for the masses. Therefore, other reliable methods for nucleic acid-based detection with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy on-par with RT-qPCR are required. Recent advancement in CRISPR technology promises its development as a POC testing device, providing a high-end, instrument-free, portable, and cost-effective workflow. Further, COVID-19 pandemic has encouraged the development of next-generation CRISPR-based diagnostics with a provision for home-testing which has resulted in the development of portable and smart-phone integrated hand-held devices which can detect various pathogenic infections in a shorter time frame than RT-qPCR. For diagnosing the presence of SCoV-2, CRISPR-based diagnostics (SHERLOCK/DETECTR) are quicker (30–60 min), less expensive ($5–15/test), and portable than RT-qPCR (90–180 min; $10–50/test) demonstrating equivalent specificity (100%) and near-equivalent sensitivity (93-100% for CRISPR-based diagnostics vs 95-100% for RT-qPCR). For high-sensitivity centralized testing, RT-qPCR is still the gold standard, but CRISPR works well in point-of-care settings because it requires little equipment (like lateral flow strips or heating blocks) and allows multiplexing. CRISPR-based diagnostics breakthrough platform like CARMEN leverages microfluidic technology to test 5,000 plus samples in a single run, unlike RT-qPCR, which requires separate reactions for each target.In this review, the advancement in CRISPR technology such as SHERLOCK, DETECTR, and other Cas-9-based diagnostics are highlighted which exclusively focuses on the CRISPR-based diagnostics to detect SCoV-2 and its emerging VOCs, highlighting their advantages and limitations compared to the gold-standard RT-qPCR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11329,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease","volume":"113 4","pages":"Article 117062"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732889325003852","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pathogenic viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 (SCoV-2), continue to pose a significant threat to human civilization. The lessons learnt from SCoV-2 infections have highlighted the requirement for robust and readily available diagnostic tools in order to limit the virus transmission and prevent future pandemics such as COVID-19. RT-qPCR-based detection is routinely used for sensitive and accurate diagnosis, which requires a sophisticated instrument, laboratory setup, and technical expertise. Though RT-qPCR is highly reliable and considered the gold standard for pathogen detection, it is costly, time-consuming, and unaffordable for the masses. Therefore, other reliable methods for nucleic acid-based detection with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy on-par with RT-qPCR are required. Recent advancement in CRISPR technology promises its development as a POC testing device, providing a high-end, instrument-free, portable, and cost-effective workflow. Further, COVID-19 pandemic has encouraged the development of next-generation CRISPR-based diagnostics with a provision for home-testing which has resulted in the development of portable and smart-phone integrated hand-held devices which can detect various pathogenic infections in a shorter time frame than RT-qPCR. For diagnosing the presence of SCoV-2, CRISPR-based diagnostics (SHERLOCK/DETECTR) are quicker (30–60 min), less expensive ($5–15/test), and portable than RT-qPCR (90–180 min; $10–50/test) demonstrating equivalent specificity (100%) and near-equivalent sensitivity (93-100% for CRISPR-based diagnostics vs 95-100% for RT-qPCR). For high-sensitivity centralized testing, RT-qPCR is still the gold standard, but CRISPR works well in point-of-care settings because it requires little equipment (like lateral flow strips or heating blocks) and allows multiplexing. CRISPR-based diagnostics breakthrough platform like CARMEN leverages microfluidic technology to test 5,000 plus samples in a single run, unlike RT-qPCR, which requires separate reactions for each target.In this review, the advancement in CRISPR technology such as SHERLOCK, DETECTR, and other Cas-9-based diagnostics are highlighted which exclusively focuses on the CRISPR-based diagnostics to detect SCoV-2 and its emerging VOCs, highlighting their advantages and limitations compared to the gold-standard RT-qPCR.
期刊介绍:
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease keeps you informed of the latest developments in clinical microbiology and the diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases. Packed with rigorously peer-reviewed articles and studies in bacteriology, immunology, immunoserology, infectious diseases, mycology, parasitology, and virology, the journal examines new procedures, unusual cases, controversial issues, and important new literature. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease distinguished independent editorial board, consisting of experts from many medical specialties, ensures you extensive and authoritative coverage.