Addressing the energy trilemma: Progress and evaluation of electricity market reform in China

IF 4.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Jiale Li , Guodong Li , Feng Song , Yanbo Feng
{"title":"Addressing the energy trilemma: Progress and evaluation of electricity market reform in China","authors":"Jiale Li ,&nbsp;Guodong Li ,&nbsp;Feng Song ,&nbsp;Yanbo Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.esd.2025.101808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the growing global emphasis on energy transition, achieving the simultaneous goals of accessibility, reliability, and sustainability—commonly referred to as the “energy trilemma”—has become a central challenge in the energy sector. As the world's largest electricity consumer, China has launched two rounds of power market reforms in 2002 and 2015 to address the trilemma challenges in the electricity sector. However, significant regional disparities in reform progress persist. This study develops a comprehensive evaluation framework using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to assess the performance of 26 provincial electricity markets under the State Grid across three key dimensions: energy affordability, supply security, and environmental sustainability. The findings indicate that electricity market reforms have advanced across all provinces, with relatively small variations in progress observed at the provincial level. However, achieving a balance among multiple objectives remains a challenge. Composite scores range from 86.5 to 93.4, with 88 % of provinces scoring above 90 in supply security, but greater variation is observed in environmental sustainability (scores ranging from 82.4 to 92.9). Notably, while spot markets have contributed to enhancing efficiency, they could potentially undermine supply security, and some power-exporting provinces are unexpectedly facing certain supply security risks. This study provides important policy insights into how electricity market reform can better align with China's energy transition strategy, ensuring coordinated and sustainable development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49209,"journal":{"name":"Energy for Sustainable Development","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101808"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082625001589","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the growing global emphasis on energy transition, achieving the simultaneous goals of accessibility, reliability, and sustainability—commonly referred to as the “energy trilemma”—has become a central challenge in the energy sector. As the world's largest electricity consumer, China has launched two rounds of power market reforms in 2002 and 2015 to address the trilemma challenges in the electricity sector. However, significant regional disparities in reform progress persist. This study develops a comprehensive evaluation framework using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to assess the performance of 26 provincial electricity markets under the State Grid across three key dimensions: energy affordability, supply security, and environmental sustainability. The findings indicate that electricity market reforms have advanced across all provinces, with relatively small variations in progress observed at the provincial level. However, achieving a balance among multiple objectives remains a challenge. Composite scores range from 86.5 to 93.4, with 88 % of provinces scoring above 90 in supply security, but greater variation is observed in environmental sustainability (scores ranging from 82.4 to 92.9). Notably, while spot markets have contributed to enhancing efficiency, they could potentially undermine supply security, and some power-exporting provinces are unexpectedly facing certain supply security risks. This study provides important policy insights into how electricity market reform can better align with China's energy transition strategy, ensuring coordinated and sustainable development.
解决能源三难困境:中国电力市场改革的进展与评价
随着全球对能源转型的日益重视,实现可及性、可靠性和可持续性的同时目标(通常被称为“能源三难困境”)已成为能源部门面临的核心挑战。作为世界上最大的电力消费国,中国在2002年和2015年启动了两轮电力市场改革,以解决电力部门面临的三难困境。然而,改革进展的显著区域差异仍然存在。本研究利用层次分析法(AHP)开发了一个综合评估框架,从能源可负担性、供应安全性和环境可持续性三个关键维度对国家电网下26个省级电力市场的表现进行评估。研究结果表明,电力市场改革在所有省份都取得了进展,各省的进展变化相对较小。然而,在多个目标之间实现平衡仍然是一个挑战。综合得分在86.5到93.4之间,其中88%的省份在供应安全方面得分在90分以上,但环境可持续性方面的差异更大(得分在82.4到92.9之间)。值得注意的是,虽然现货市场有助于提高效率,但它们可能会破坏供应安全,一些电力出口省份意外地面临一定的供应安全风险。本研究为电力市场改革如何更好地与中国能源转型战略对接、确保协调和可持续发展提供了重要的政策见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy for Sustainable Development
Energy for Sustainable Development ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the International Energy Initiative, Energy for Sustainable Development is the journal for decision makers, managers, consultants, policy makers, planners and researchers in both government and non-government organizations. It publishes original research and reviews about energy in developing countries, sustainable development, energy resources, technologies, policies and interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信