Assessing circular economy at company level: Comparison of tools and methodological challenges

IF 9.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Beatrice Bais , Margherita Molinaro , Guido Orzes
{"title":"Assessing circular economy at company level: Comparison of tools and methodological challenges","authors":"Beatrice Bais ,&nbsp;Margherita Molinaro ,&nbsp;Guido Orzes","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While circular economy adoption is growing worldwide, its systematic assessment remains a challenge. This paper aims to shed light on the strengths and weaknesses of firm-level circular economy assessment tools and to theorize on the circular economy assessment issue. Four tools were selected and compared based on a qualitative comparative analysis as well as on their practical application to multiple case studies. The originality of this comparison lies in evaluating the extent to which these tools are affected by ontological and etymological issues and by epistemological and human cognitive bias. Such an evaluation was based on seven criteria rooted in the interpretivist research paradigm and grounded theory methodology. The results indicate that, albeit providing circular economy awareness and insights on high-level strategic circular economy practices, the tools can be improved in terms of transferability, credibility, confirmability, fit, and generality. Current holistic tools fail to consider some firms' specificities and to provide circular economy implications, besides being subject to user manipulation due to issues such as low reliability and human bias. Accordingly, the study provides suggestions to improve the development of future circular economy assessment tools and enhance practitioners' awareness of the effective use of these tools, having both academic and practical implications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"59 ","pages":"Pages 112-126"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550925001460","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While circular economy adoption is growing worldwide, its systematic assessment remains a challenge. This paper aims to shed light on the strengths and weaknesses of firm-level circular economy assessment tools and to theorize on the circular economy assessment issue. Four tools were selected and compared based on a qualitative comparative analysis as well as on their practical application to multiple case studies. The originality of this comparison lies in evaluating the extent to which these tools are affected by ontological and etymological issues and by epistemological and human cognitive bias. Such an evaluation was based on seven criteria rooted in the interpretivist research paradigm and grounded theory methodology. The results indicate that, albeit providing circular economy awareness and insights on high-level strategic circular economy practices, the tools can be improved in terms of transferability, credibility, confirmability, fit, and generality. Current holistic tools fail to consider some firms' specificities and to provide circular economy implications, besides being subject to user manipulation due to issues such as low reliability and human bias. Accordingly, the study provides suggestions to improve the development of future circular economy assessment tools and enhance practitioners' awareness of the effective use of these tools, having both academic and practical implications.
在公司层面评估循环经济:工具和方法挑战的比较
虽然循环经济的采用在全球范围内不断增长,但其系统评估仍然是一个挑战。本文旨在揭示企业层面循环经济评估工具的优缺点,并对循环经济评估问题进行理论化。根据定性比较分析及其在多个案例研究中的实际应用,选择并比较了四种工具。这种比较的独创性在于评估这些工具受本体论和词源学问题以及认识论和人类认知偏见影响的程度。这种评价基于七个标准,这些标准植根于解释主义研究范式和扎根理论方法论。结果表明,尽管这些工具提供了循环经济意识和高层次战略循环经济实践的见解,但在可转移性、可信度、可确认性、适合性和通用性方面仍有待改进。目前的整体工具没有考虑到一些公司的特殊性,也没有提供循环经济的影响,此外,由于可靠性低和人为偏见等问题,它们还会受到用户的操纵。因此,本研究为未来循环经济评估工具的发展提供了建议,并提高了从业者有效使用这些工具的意识,具有学术和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信