Associations between changes in frailty status and non-neoplastic digestive system diseases: A cohort study based on the China health and retirement longitudinal study

IF 4.3
Jingwei Che , Qiao Song , Chunyu Zhao , Yuan Yuan , Xiaohua Lyu
{"title":"Associations between changes in frailty status and non-neoplastic digestive system diseases: A cohort study based on the China health and retirement longitudinal study","authors":"Jingwei Che ,&nbsp;Qiao Song ,&nbsp;Chunyu Zhao ,&nbsp;Yuan Yuan ,&nbsp;Xiaohua Lyu","doi":"10.1016/j.exger.2025.112861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While prior studies have linked baseline frailty to specific non-neoplastic digestive diseases (NNDSD), the impact of frailty status transitions remains understudied.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Participants were sourced from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) and categorized as robust, pre-frail, or frail using a frailty index comprising 32 health deficits with thresholds of 0.10 and 0.25. The frailty status at initial follow-up served as the baseline, and transitions were assessed using changes between the first and second follow-ups. NNDSD was defined based on patients' self-reports of whether a physician diagnosed them with a relevant disease. Associations between baseline frailty status, frailty transitions and NNDSD were assessed using Cox proportional hazards modeling. Finally, multiple sensitivity analyses were performed to validate result robustness.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 6994 participants (41 % women) were included in the baseline. Participants classified as pre-frail (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.55, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.38–1.75) and frail (HR: 2.39, 95 % CI: 1.99–2.89) exhibited elevated NNDSD incidence. The final sample comprised 5299 participants (41 % women). Progression to pre-frail (HR: 1.64, 95 % CI: 1.30–2.10) and frail (HR: 2.91, 95 % CI: 1.72–4.90) was associated with NNDSD risk relative to participants who remained robust. Progression from pre-frail to frail (HR: 1.39 95 % CI: 1.08–1.81) elevated the risk of NNDSD onset. Recovery from pre-frail to robust (HR: 0.73, 95 % CI: 0.57–0.94) was associated with reduced NNDSD risk, with sensitivity findings corroborating study robustness.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Changes in frailty status were positively associated with new-onset NNDSD risk. Frailty progression corresponded to elevated risk, whereas reversal was linked to risk reduction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94003,"journal":{"name":"Experimental gerontology","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 112861"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0531556525001901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

While prior studies have linked baseline frailty to specific non-neoplastic digestive diseases (NNDSD), the impact of frailty status transitions remains understudied.

Method

Participants were sourced from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) and categorized as robust, pre-frail, or frail using a frailty index comprising 32 health deficits with thresholds of 0.10 and 0.25. The frailty status at initial follow-up served as the baseline, and transitions were assessed using changes between the first and second follow-ups. NNDSD was defined based on patients' self-reports of whether a physician diagnosed them with a relevant disease. Associations between baseline frailty status, frailty transitions and NNDSD were assessed using Cox proportional hazards modeling. Finally, multiple sensitivity analyses were performed to validate result robustness.

Results

A total of 6994 participants (41 % women) were included in the baseline. Participants classified as pre-frail (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.55, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.38–1.75) and frail (HR: 2.39, 95 % CI: 1.99–2.89) exhibited elevated NNDSD incidence. The final sample comprised 5299 participants (41 % women). Progression to pre-frail (HR: 1.64, 95 % CI: 1.30–2.10) and frail (HR: 2.91, 95 % CI: 1.72–4.90) was associated with NNDSD risk relative to participants who remained robust. Progression from pre-frail to frail (HR: 1.39 95 % CI: 1.08–1.81) elevated the risk of NNDSD onset. Recovery from pre-frail to robust (HR: 0.73, 95 % CI: 0.57–0.94) was associated with reduced NNDSD risk, with sensitivity findings corroborating study robustness.

Conclusions

Changes in frailty status were positively associated with new-onset NNDSD risk. Frailty progression corresponded to elevated risk, whereas reversal was linked to risk reduction.
虚弱状态变化与非肿瘤性消化系统疾病之间的关系:基于中国健康与退休纵向研究的队列研究
虽然先前的研究将基线虚弱与特定的非肿瘤性消化系统疾病(NNDSD)联系起来,但虚弱状态转变的影响仍未得到充分研究。参与者来自中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS),并使用由32个健康缺陷组成的虚弱指数(阈值为0.10和0.25)将其分类为健壮、体弱或体弱。最初随访时的虚弱状态作为基线,并使用第一次和第二次随访之间的变化来评估过渡。NNDSD的定义基于患者是否被医生诊断患有相关疾病的自我报告。使用Cox比例风险模型评估基线虚弱状态、虚弱转变和NNDSD之间的关系。最后,进行多重敏感性分析以验证结果的稳健性。结果6994名参与者(41%为女性)被纳入基线。被分类为体弱前(风险比[HR]: 1.55, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.38-1.75)和体弱(风险比:2.39,95% CI: 1.99-2.89)的参与者表现出NNDSD发生率升高。最终的样本包括5299名参与者(41%是女性)。相对于身体健康的参与者,进展到体弱前(HR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.30-2.10)和体弱(HR: 2.91, 95% CI: 1.72-4.90)与NNDSD风险相关。从前期体弱到体弱的进展(HR: 1.39 95% CI: 1.08-1.81)增加了NNDSD发病的风险。从虚弱前期恢复到强壮(HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.57-0.94)与NNDSD风险降低相关,敏感性结果证实了研究的稳健性。结论虚弱状态的改变与新发NNDSD风险呈正相关。虚弱的进展与风险增加有关,而逆转与风险降低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experimental gerontology
Experimental gerontology Ageing, Biochemistry, Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信