A novel sectoral group analytic hierarchy process model with explicit market share – Understanding policy gaps in the rail freight market

IF 3.8 Q2 TRANSPORTATION
Szabolcs Duleba , Bálint Farkas , Sarbast Moslem , Brian Caulfield
{"title":"A novel sectoral group analytic hierarchy process model with explicit market share – Understanding policy gaps in the rail freight market","authors":"Szabolcs Duleba ,&nbsp;Bálint Farkas ,&nbsp;Sarbast Moslem ,&nbsp;Brian Caulfield","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rail freight policy should reflect both the current and foreseen situations of the certain national rail freight market. The situation analysis is often based on expert evaluations, in many cases with the participation of the market players themselves, and their synthesized group opinion is the basis of policy-making. However, the creation of opinion synthesis has not considered the market power of the players so far, and a clear research gap exists on how to properly addressing weights to the respondent experts in the group of evaluators to gain a realistic image on the present and future of the rail freight market. The objective of this paper is to identify problems, risks, and development potential in an EU national rail freight market by an expert survey based new methodology (Sectoral Group Analytic Hierarchy Process, SGAHP) that assigns different decision-maker weights in the respondent group based on the different market power of the players to gain a clear and overall image on the examined market. As a case study, a survey has been conducted in Hungary involving the significant representatives of the national rail freight. Results show that the recruitment and training of human resource is a common problem, while supporting single wagon traffic is meaningless for all players. However, big companies prioritise the reduction of locomotive maintenance time, while small ones strive to have own maintenance facilities. As an implication, the proposed model might help state decision-makers in customizing financial or other support to efficiently increase the competitiveness of the sector, as well as the rail companies to better adopt to the situation. The proposed new model has been proven successful not only from the aspect of robustness and sensitivity, but also of recommending practical modifications in rail freight to transport planners both on national and EU levels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101579"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198225002581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rail freight policy should reflect both the current and foreseen situations of the certain national rail freight market. The situation analysis is often based on expert evaluations, in many cases with the participation of the market players themselves, and their synthesized group opinion is the basis of policy-making. However, the creation of opinion synthesis has not considered the market power of the players so far, and a clear research gap exists on how to properly addressing weights to the respondent experts in the group of evaluators to gain a realistic image on the present and future of the rail freight market. The objective of this paper is to identify problems, risks, and development potential in an EU national rail freight market by an expert survey based new methodology (Sectoral Group Analytic Hierarchy Process, SGAHP) that assigns different decision-maker weights in the respondent group based on the different market power of the players to gain a clear and overall image on the examined market. As a case study, a survey has been conducted in Hungary involving the significant representatives of the national rail freight. Results show that the recruitment and training of human resource is a common problem, while supporting single wagon traffic is meaningless for all players. However, big companies prioritise the reduction of locomotive maintenance time, while small ones strive to have own maintenance facilities. As an implication, the proposed model might help state decision-makers in customizing financial or other support to efficiently increase the competitiveness of the sector, as well as the rail companies to better adopt to the situation. The proposed new model has been proven successful not only from the aspect of robustness and sensitivity, but also of recommending practical modifications in rail freight to transport planners both on national and EU levels.
一种具有明确市场份额的新型部门集团层次分析法模型——理解铁路货运市场的政策缺口
铁路货运政策应反映一定国家铁路货运市场的现状和预期情况。形势分析往往以专家评价为基础,在许多情况下,市场参与者自己也参与其中,他们综合的群体意见是决策的基础。然而,到目前为止,意见综合的创建还没有考虑到参与者的市场力量,并且在如何适当地给评估者群体中的应答专家分配权重以获得对铁路货运市场现在和未来的现实形象方面存在明显的研究差距。本文的目的是通过一种基于专家调查的新方法(部门集团层次分析法,SGAHP)来识别欧盟国家铁路货运市场的问题、风险和发展潜力,该方法根据参与者的不同市场力量在被调查群体中分配不同的决策者权重,以获得对所调查市场的清晰和整体形象。作为一个案例研究,在匈牙利进行了一项调查,涉及全国铁路货运的重要代表。结果表明,人力资源的招聘和培训是一个普遍的问题,而支持单车流量对所有玩家来说都是没有意义的。然而,大公司优先考虑减少机车维修时间,而小公司则努力拥有自己的维修设施。由此可见,所提出的模型可以帮助国家决策者定制财政或其他支持,以有效提高该行业的竞争力,也可以帮助铁路公司更好地适应这种情况。所提出的新模型已被证明是成功的,不仅从稳健性和敏感性方面,而且从国家和欧盟层面的运输规划人员建议铁路货运的实际修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信