Surgical bundle sustainability in caesarean section births: An integrative review.

Bern Squires, Thea van de Mortel, Peta-Anne Zimmerman
{"title":"Surgical bundle sustainability in caesarean section births: An integrative review.","authors":"Bern Squires, Thea van de Mortel, Peta-Anne Zimmerman","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2025.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical site infection (SSI) rates for Australian patients undergoing caesarean section births (CS) range from 5 % to 9 %. As CS rates are increasing, it is imperative to identify effective measures to reduce SSIs. Surgical bundles are one strategy used to prevent infections in various surgical procedures.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify and discuss the evidence supporting the combination of individual surgical bundle practices in CS births that contribute to SSI reduction and how these surgical bundle practices are sustained.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An integrative review was undertaken using articles from a systematic search of five research databases. The review examined studies that implemented or evaluated a surgical bundle for CSs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten articles met the inclusion criteria. All reported SSI reductions post-intervention. Studies implementing four or fewer surgical bundle components demonstrated a larger reduction in infection rates and increased compliance compared to those with five or more components. Studies with shorter durations, prospective designs, and smaller sample sizes all reported a larger reduction in SSIs. Compliance was reported throughout the studies, but recommendations to achieve long-term sustainability were not supported by evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review identified a surgical bundle with four components that may reduce the SSI rate in CS births. Strategies to sustain evidence-based practices to reduce SSIs in CS have not been extensively studied. Future research should investigate factors that support compliance and track ongoing compliance with infection prevention surgical bundle elements, as well as their impact on SSI rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":94040,"journal":{"name":"Infection, disease & health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection, disease & health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2025.07.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) rates for Australian patients undergoing caesarean section births (CS) range from 5 % to 9 %. As CS rates are increasing, it is imperative to identify effective measures to reduce SSIs. Surgical bundles are one strategy used to prevent infections in various surgical procedures.

Aim: To identify and discuss the evidence supporting the combination of individual surgical bundle practices in CS births that contribute to SSI reduction and how these surgical bundle practices are sustained.

Methods: An integrative review was undertaken using articles from a systematic search of five research databases. The review examined studies that implemented or evaluated a surgical bundle for CSs.

Results: Ten articles met the inclusion criteria. All reported SSI reductions post-intervention. Studies implementing four or fewer surgical bundle components demonstrated a larger reduction in infection rates and increased compliance compared to those with five or more components. Studies with shorter durations, prospective designs, and smaller sample sizes all reported a larger reduction in SSIs. Compliance was reported throughout the studies, but recommendations to achieve long-term sustainability were not supported by evidence.

Conclusion: This review identified a surgical bundle with four components that may reduce the SSI rate in CS births. Strategies to sustain evidence-based practices to reduce SSIs in CS have not been extensively studied. Future research should investigate factors that support compliance and track ongoing compliance with infection prevention surgical bundle elements, as well as their impact on SSI rates.

剖宫产手术束的可持续性:一项综合综述。
背景:澳大利亚剖宫产患者手术部位感染(SSI)率为5% - 9%。随着CS率的增加,必须确定有效的措施来减少ssi。手术包是在各种外科手术中预防感染的一种策略。目的:识别和讨论支持CS分娩中个体手术束做法有助于减少SSI的证据,以及这些手术束做法如何持续。方法:采用系统检索五个研究数据库中的文章进行综合评价。本综述检查了实施或评估手术包治疗CSs的研究。结果:10篇文章符合纳入标准。所有报告干预后SSI减少。实施四个或更少的手术束组件的研究表明,与使用五个或更多组件的研究相比,使用四个或更少的手术束组件更能降低感染率并提高依从性。持续时间较短、前瞻性设计和样本量较小的研究均报告ssi的降低幅度较大。在整个研究过程中都报告了依从性,但实现长期可持续性的建议没有证据支持。结论:本综述确定了一种包含四个组成部分的手术束,可以降低CS分娩的SSI率。维持循证实践以减少CS中ssi的策略尚未得到广泛研究。未来的研究应调查支持依从性的因素,并跟踪正在进行的感染预防手术束元件的依从性,以及它们对SSI率的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信