Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy and Complications of Low-Temperature Plasma Tonsillectomy Versus Traditional Tonsillectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 0.7
Weijiao Liu, Jian Wang
{"title":"Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy and Complications of Low-Temperature Plasma Tonsillectomy Versus Traditional Tonsillectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Weijiao Liu, Jian Wang","doi":"10.1177/01455613251365762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low-temperature plasma tonsillectomy (LTPT) has emerged as a promising surgical technique for treating chronic tonsillitis (CT), offering advantages such as reduced postoperative pain, faster recovery, and decreased risk of bleeding compared with traditional tonsillectomy (TT). However, the comparative effectiveness and safety of LTPT remain under debate.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to systematically evaluate the clinical outcomes and complication rates associated with LTPT versus TT in CT patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major databases, including Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, VIP, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, covering studies published between January 2010 and the present. Eight case-control studies comprising 654 patients were included. Data were analyzed using the RevMan 5.3 software, and risk of bias was assessed based on the Cochrane Handbook.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Meta-analysis revealed that LTPT significantly reduced operation time (MD -12.4 minutes, 95% CI -15.2 to -9.6), intraoperative blood loss (MD -15.2 mL, 95% CI -20.1 to -10.3), and hospitalization duration (MD -0.7 days, 95% CI -1.0 to -0.4). LTPT was also associated with faster white membrane formation and lower postoperative visual analog scale scores. Inflammatory markers such as tumor necrosis factor-α (<i>P</i> = .002) and hypersensitivity C-reactive protein (<i>P</i> < .001) were significantly lower. Additionally, the complication rate in the LTPT group was markedly reduced (RR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.57; <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LTPT demonstrates superior perioperative outcomes and safety compared with TT in CT patients. Despite these benefits, further large-scale, high-quality studies are needed to confirm its long-term efficacy and guide clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":93984,"journal":{"name":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","volume":" ","pages":"1455613251365762"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613251365762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low-temperature plasma tonsillectomy (LTPT) has emerged as a promising surgical technique for treating chronic tonsillitis (CT), offering advantages such as reduced postoperative pain, faster recovery, and decreased risk of bleeding compared with traditional tonsillectomy (TT). However, the comparative effectiveness and safety of LTPT remain under debate.

Objective: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the clinical outcomes and complication rates associated with LTPT versus TT in CT patients.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major databases, including Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, VIP, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, covering studies published between January 2010 and the present. Eight case-control studies comprising 654 patients were included. Data were analyzed using the RevMan 5.3 software, and risk of bias was assessed based on the Cochrane Handbook.

Results: Meta-analysis revealed that LTPT significantly reduced operation time (MD -12.4 minutes, 95% CI -15.2 to -9.6), intraoperative blood loss (MD -15.2 mL, 95% CI -20.1 to -10.3), and hospitalization duration (MD -0.7 days, 95% CI -1.0 to -0.4). LTPT was also associated with faster white membrane formation and lower postoperative visual analog scale scores. Inflammatory markers such as tumor necrosis factor-α (P = .002) and hypersensitivity C-reactive protein (P < .001) were significantly lower. Additionally, the complication rate in the LTPT group was markedly reduced (RR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.57; P < .001).

Conclusion: LTPT demonstrates superior perioperative outcomes and safety compared with TT in CT patients. Despite these benefits, further large-scale, high-quality studies are needed to confirm its long-term efficacy and guide clinical application.

低温等离子体扁桃体切除术与传统扁桃体切除术的临床疗效及并发症比较:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:低温等离子体扁桃体切除术(LTPT)已成为治疗慢性扁桃体炎(CT)的一种很有前途的手术技术,与传统的扁桃体切除术(TT)相比,它具有减轻术后疼痛、更快恢复和降低出血风险等优点。然而,LTPT的相对有效性和安全性仍存在争议。目的:本研究旨在系统评估LTPT与TT在CT患者中的临床结果和并发症发生率。方法:综合检索中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、中国知网(CNKI)、万方、维普、PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆等主要数据库,检索2010年1月至今发表的研究。纳入了8项病例对照研究,共654例患者。数据分析采用RevMan 5.3软件,偏倚风险评估依据Cochrane手册。结果:荟萃分析显示,LTPT显着减少了手术时间(MD -12.4分钟,95% CI -15.2至-9.6),术中出血量(MD -15.2 mL, 95% CI -20.1至-10.3)和住院时间(MD -0.7天,95% CI -1.0至-0.4)。LTPT还与更快的白膜形成和较低的术后视觉模拟评分有关。肿瘤坏死因子-α (P = .002)和超敏c反应蛋白(P = .002)等炎症标志物结论:与CT患者相比,LTPT在围手术期疗效和安全性方面优于TT。尽管有这些好处,但需要进一步大规模、高质量的研究来证实其长期疗效并指导临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信