Unlocking Findings of Entrustable Professional Activities for Trainee Development, Entrustment, and Practice Readiness in Pre-registration Pharmacy Training: A Systematic Review
Tarik Al-Diery , Sally Marotti , Kyung Min Kirsten Lee , AbdelHakim Bishawi , Debra Rowett , Jacinta L. Johnson
{"title":"Unlocking Findings of Entrustable Professional Activities for Trainee Development, Entrustment, and Practice Readiness in Pre-registration Pharmacy Training: A Systematic Review","authors":"Tarik Al-Diery , Sally Marotti , Kyung Min Kirsten Lee , AbdelHakim Bishawi , Debra Rowett , Jacinta L. Johnson","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore key findings on the use of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) in preregistration pharmacy training, with a focus on their role in trainee development, entrustment decision-making, and practice readiness.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted across 5 electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Emcare, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)) to identify studies reporting on the use of EPAs in preregistration pharmacy training. Studies that described how EPAs influenced trainee development, entrustment decision-making, and practice readiness were included. Two independent reviewers screened and extracted data from the included studies. Key findings were synthesized into thematic domains. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool 2018 was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 581 articles were screened, with 27 meeting the inclusion criteria (17 quantitative descriptive, 7 mixed methods, and 3 qualitative studies). A narrative synthesis of the eligible studies revealed 3 key findings: EPAs support the progressive entrustment of trainees across different time points in training, EPA implementation enhances trainees’ self-directed learning and self-awareness skills, and supervisor entrustment decisions are influenced by a range of contextual, personal, and trainee-related factors. Although EPAs were consistently associated with increased trainee autonomy, entrustment practices among supervisors remained relatively variable. Most included studies were assessed as medium to high quality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The use of EPAs in pharmacy education fosters trainee autonomy, self-assessment, and professional growth in trainees. However, variability in supervisor decision-making highlights the need for further research to support consistent EPA implementation and supervisor training in authentic practice environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"89 9","pages":"Article 101485"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945925001305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To explore key findings on the use of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) in preregistration pharmacy training, with a focus on their role in trainee development, entrustment decision-making, and practice readiness.
Methods
A systematic search was conducted across 5 electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Emcare, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)) to identify studies reporting on the use of EPAs in preregistration pharmacy training. Studies that described how EPAs influenced trainee development, entrustment decision-making, and practice readiness were included. Two independent reviewers screened and extracted data from the included studies. Key findings were synthesized into thematic domains. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool 2018 was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies.
Results
A total of 581 articles were screened, with 27 meeting the inclusion criteria (17 quantitative descriptive, 7 mixed methods, and 3 qualitative studies). A narrative synthesis of the eligible studies revealed 3 key findings: EPAs support the progressive entrustment of trainees across different time points in training, EPA implementation enhances trainees’ self-directed learning and self-awareness skills, and supervisor entrustment decisions are influenced by a range of contextual, personal, and trainee-related factors. Although EPAs were consistently associated with increased trainee autonomy, entrustment practices among supervisors remained relatively variable. Most included studies were assessed as medium to high quality.
Conclusion
The use of EPAs in pharmacy education fosters trainee autonomy, self-assessment, and professional growth in trainees. However, variability in supervisor decision-making highlights the need for further research to support consistent EPA implementation and supervisor training in authentic practice environments.
期刊介绍:
The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors.
After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.