Energy cost and game dynamics in soccer: comparing sided games and repeated sprint training.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Ersin Akılveren, Asuman Şahan, Emel Çetin Özdoğan
{"title":"Energy cost and game dynamics in soccer: comparing sided games and repeated sprint training.","authors":"Ersin Akılveren, Asuman Şahan, Emel Çetin Özdoğan","doi":"10.1186/s13102-025-01278-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to propose an alternative solution for determining the optimal training load to meet the high physiological demands of football, encompassing both metabolic and locomotor loads. To this end, two different formats, repetitive sprint training (RST) and sided games (SGs), were evaluated in terms of energy cost (EC), and their similarities were revealed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted with 21 men soccer players (age: 18.24 ± 0.63 yrs, training age: 7.24 ± 0.63 yrs, body weight: 73.01 ± 7.47 kg). RST and various-sided games (4 × 4 small-sided games and 6 × 6 medium-sided games) were played according to the rules, with goalkeeper and ball possession rules tailored to different field dimensions. Both training methods were performed separately on matchday + 4 / -3 within a weekly cycle. While all SGs work for 420 s and rest for 4 min, RST performed 720 m. with 20 s rest between bouts and 4 min between sets. EC was measured using global positioning system technology during all training sessions, considering total and equivalent running distance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study demonstrated that the 4v4 + Goalkeeper SSG and RST energy cost results EC cost results in similar conditioning improvement (5917.76 J/kg and 6181.00 J/kg, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As a result of the study, 4v4 + Gk SSG showed similar results regarding energy cost with RST. Additionally, it was determined that metabolic demands increased as the number of players decreased in SGs with constant m² per player.</p>","PeriodicalId":48585,"journal":{"name":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"17 1","pages":"239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12355877/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-025-01278-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aims to propose an alternative solution for determining the optimal training load to meet the high physiological demands of football, encompassing both metabolic and locomotor loads. To this end, two different formats, repetitive sprint training (RST) and sided games (SGs), were evaluated in terms of energy cost (EC), and their similarities were revealed.

Methods: The study was conducted with 21 men soccer players (age: 18.24 ± 0.63 yrs, training age: 7.24 ± 0.63 yrs, body weight: 73.01 ± 7.47 kg). RST and various-sided games (4 × 4 small-sided games and 6 × 6 medium-sided games) were played according to the rules, with goalkeeper and ball possession rules tailored to different field dimensions. Both training methods were performed separately on matchday + 4 / -3 within a weekly cycle. While all SGs work for 420 s and rest for 4 min, RST performed 720 m. with 20 s rest between bouts and 4 min between sets. EC was measured using global positioning system technology during all training sessions, considering total and equivalent running distance.

Results: The study demonstrated that the 4v4 + Goalkeeper SSG and RST energy cost results EC cost results in similar conditioning improvement (5917.76 J/kg and 6181.00 J/kg, respectively).

Conclusion: As a result of the study, 4v4 + Gk SSG showed similar results regarding energy cost with RST. Additionally, it was determined that metabolic demands increased as the number of players decreased in SGs with constant m² per player.

足球运动中的能量消耗与比赛动力学:侧边比赛与重复冲刺训练的比较。
背景:本研究旨在提出一种替代方案,以确定最佳训练负荷,以满足足球运动的高生理要求,包括代谢负荷和运动负荷。为此,我们对重复冲刺训练(RST)和侧边游戏(SGs)两种不同的训练形式进行了能量消耗(EC)评估,并揭示了它们之间的相似性。方法:以21名男子足球运动员为研究对象,年龄:18.24±0.63岁,训练年龄:7.24±0.63岁,体重:73.01±7.47 kg。RST和各局比赛(4 × 4小局和6 × 6中局)按规则进行,守门员和控球规则根据不同的场地尺寸量身定制。两种训练方法在每周的比赛日+ 4 / -3分别进行。所有运动员的运动时间为420秒,休息时间为4分钟,而RST的运动时间为720秒,两组之间休息20秒,两组之间休息4分钟。在所有训练期间使用全球定位系统技术测量EC,考虑总和等效跑步距离。结果:研究表明,4v4 +守门员SSG和RST能量成本结果EC成本对调节的改善效果相似(分别为5917.76 J/kg和6181.00 J/kg)。结论:研究结果表明,4v4 + Gk SSG在能量成本方面与RST具有相似的结果。此外,我们确定代谢需求随着玩家数量的减少而增加,每个玩家的m²不变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
196
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation is an open access, peer reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of sports medicine and the exercise sciences, including rehabilitation, traumatology, cardiology, physiology, and nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信