From body mass index to waist circumference: a paradigm shift in assessing access complexity in percutaneous nephrolithotomy- comparative study.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Timucin Sipal, Erdal Yilmaz, Ferhat Yakup Suceken, Abdullah Yilmaz, Kemal Sarica
{"title":"From body mass index to waist circumference: a paradigm shift in assessing access complexity in percutaneous nephrolithotomy- comparative study.","authors":"Timucin Sipal, Erdal Yilmaz, Ferhat Yakup Suceken, Abdullah Yilmaz, Kemal Sarica","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01834-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To compare waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI) on renal access difficulty during percutaneous nephrolithotomy surgery (PCNL) with fluoroscopic guided PCNL (FPCNL) and ultrasonographic guided PCNL (UPCNL) access techniques. 109 patients underwent PCNL, with 63 FGPNL and 46 UPCNL techniques. Patients were categorized as WC ≥ 90 or less cm and BMI ≥ 30 or less. Stone-free rate (SFR) was presented as Grade A (no stone), Grade B (≤ 2 mm), Grade C (A + B + 2.1-4 mm), and > 4 mm, based on a non-contrast computed tomography scan. The difficulty level of access was evaluated by number of accesses attempted (NAA) and access time (AT). SFR was similar between patients with low and high WC and BMI (40% for BMI < 30 vs. 42% for BMI > 30, p = 0.389 and 43.7% for WC < 90 vs. 30.7% for WC > 90, p = 0.779). SFR is also similar between UPCNL (41.3%) and FPCNL (44.4%) techniques, p = 0.733. In the UPCNL technique, increased WC, not BMI, is associated with increased NAA and AT. In the FPCNL technique, however, BMI and WC did not affect access parameters. A linear regression analysis indicated that only WC and hydronephroses levels had reached a prediction power for an AT and NAA (p < 0.05). In patients with central obesity, WC may be a more reliable predictor than BMI for estimating access difficulty in the UPCNL technique. While UPCNL appears to have a safety advantage over FPCNL regarding radiation exposure, FPCNL may be a more suitable option for obese patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"157"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01834-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To compare waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI) on renal access difficulty during percutaneous nephrolithotomy surgery (PCNL) with fluoroscopic guided PCNL (FPCNL) and ultrasonographic guided PCNL (UPCNL) access techniques. 109 patients underwent PCNL, with 63 FGPNL and 46 UPCNL techniques. Patients were categorized as WC ≥ 90 or less cm and BMI ≥ 30 or less. Stone-free rate (SFR) was presented as Grade A (no stone), Grade B (≤ 2 mm), Grade C (A + B + 2.1-4 mm), and > 4 mm, based on a non-contrast computed tomography scan. The difficulty level of access was evaluated by number of accesses attempted (NAA) and access time (AT). SFR was similar between patients with low and high WC and BMI (40% for BMI < 30 vs. 42% for BMI > 30, p = 0.389 and 43.7% for WC < 90 vs. 30.7% for WC > 90, p = 0.779). SFR is also similar between UPCNL (41.3%) and FPCNL (44.4%) techniques, p = 0.733. In the UPCNL technique, increased WC, not BMI, is associated with increased NAA and AT. In the FPCNL technique, however, BMI and WC did not affect access parameters. A linear regression analysis indicated that only WC and hydronephroses levels had reached a prediction power for an AT and NAA (p < 0.05). In patients with central obesity, WC may be a more reliable predictor than BMI for estimating access difficulty in the UPCNL technique. While UPCNL appears to have a safety advantage over FPCNL regarding radiation exposure, FPCNL may be a more suitable option for obese patients.

从体重指数到腰围:评估经皮肾镜取石术通路复杂性的范式转变——比较研究。
比较透视引导下PCNL (FPCNL)和超声引导下PCNL (UPCNL)入路技术在经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)中,腰围(WC)和体重指数(BMI)对肾脏入路困难的影响。109例患者行PCNL,其中FGPNL 63例,UPCNL 46例。患者分为WC≥90 cm和BMI≥30。无结石率(SFR)分为A级(无结石),B级(≤2mm), C级(A + B + 2.1-4 mm)和> 4 mm,基于非对比ct扫描。通过尝试访问次数(NAA)和访问时间(AT)来评估访问的困难程度。低WC和高BMI患者的SFR相似(BMI 30为40%,p = 0.389; WC 90为43.7%,p = 0.779)。UPCNL(41.3%)和FPCNL(44.4%)技术之间的SFR也相似,p = 0.733。在UPCNL技术中,WC的增加与NAA和AT的增加有关,而不是BMI。而在FPCNL技术中,BMI和WC对接入参数没有影响。线性回归分析表明,只有WC和水肾水平达到了AT和NAA的预测能力(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urolithiasis
Urolithiasis UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field. Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信