Weicai Su, Jinping Li, Minfeng Zhai, Panrong Wang, Yang Zhao, Xuenan Hu, Yan Wang
{"title":"Current Status and Influencing Factors of Decisional Conflict in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Systemic Therapy: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.","authors":"Weicai Su, Jinping Li, Minfeng Zhai, Panrong Wang, Yang Zhao, Xuenan Hu, Yan Wang","doi":"10.1111/1759-7714.70150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the current status of decisional conflict in lung cancer patients receiving systemic therapy and to analyze its influencing factors, with the aim of providing a basis for developing decision support strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From August to September 2024, a convenience sample of 500 patients receiving systemic therapy for lung cancer at the Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, was surveyed. Data were collected using a general information questionnaire, the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), Cancer Patient's Involvement in Treatment Decision-Making Scale (CPITDM), Preparation for Decision-Making Scale (PreDM), and Decisional Regret Scale (DRS).</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The mean DCS score was 47.28 ± 15.83, with subscale scores ranking from highest to lowest as decision support/effectiveness, decision uncertainty, and information/values. The mean CPITDM, PreDM, and DRS scores were 28.56 ± 3.91, 63.02 ± 11.65, and 9.46 ± 2.62, respectively. DCS was negatively correlated with CPITDM (r = -0.188, p < 0.001) and PreDM (r = -0.303, p < 0.001) but positively correlated with DRS (r = 0.342, p < 0.001). Multiple regression identified occupation, medical payment, treatment line, pathology, medication type, patient involvement, and preparedness as significant influencing factors (p < 0.05), explaining 59.9% of variance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lung cancer patients receiving systemic therapy experience a relatively high level of decisional conflict, with many exhibiting delayed decision-making. Healthcare providers should identify high-risk patients early based on key influencing factors and explore practical clinical decision support interventions. Enhancing decision readiness and reducing decision regret may help to improve quality of life and reduce decisional conflict.</p>","PeriodicalId":23338,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic Cancer","volume":"16 16","pages":"e70150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12356992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70150","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the current status of decisional conflict in lung cancer patients receiving systemic therapy and to analyze its influencing factors, with the aim of providing a basis for developing decision support strategies.
Methods: From August to September 2024, a convenience sample of 500 patients receiving systemic therapy for lung cancer at the Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, was surveyed. Data were collected using a general information questionnaire, the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), Cancer Patient's Involvement in Treatment Decision-Making Scale (CPITDM), Preparation for Decision-Making Scale (PreDM), and Decisional Regret Scale (DRS).
Result: The mean DCS score was 47.28 ± 15.83, with subscale scores ranking from highest to lowest as decision support/effectiveness, decision uncertainty, and information/values. The mean CPITDM, PreDM, and DRS scores were 28.56 ± 3.91, 63.02 ± 11.65, and 9.46 ± 2.62, respectively. DCS was negatively correlated with CPITDM (r = -0.188, p < 0.001) and PreDM (r = -0.303, p < 0.001) but positively correlated with DRS (r = 0.342, p < 0.001). Multiple regression identified occupation, medical payment, treatment line, pathology, medication type, patient involvement, and preparedness as significant influencing factors (p < 0.05), explaining 59.9% of variance.
Conclusion: Lung cancer patients receiving systemic therapy experience a relatively high level of decisional conflict, with many exhibiting delayed decision-making. Healthcare providers should identify high-risk patients early based on key influencing factors and explore practical clinical decision support interventions. Enhancing decision readiness and reducing decision regret may help to improve quality of life and reduce decisional conflict.
期刊介绍:
Thoracic Cancer aims to facilitate international collaboration and exchange of comprehensive and cutting-edge information on basic, translational, and applied clinical research in lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mediastinal cancer, breast cancer and other thoracic malignancies. Prevention, treatment and research relevant to Asia-Pacific is a focus area, but submissions from all regions are welcomed. The editors encourage contributions relevant to prevention, general thoracic surgery, medical oncology, radiology, radiation medicine, pathology, basic cancer research, as well as epidemiological and translational studies in thoracic cancer. Thoracic Cancer is the official publication of the Chinese Society of Lung Cancer, International Chinese Society of Thoracic Surgery and is endorsed by the Korean Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society.
The Journal publishes a range of article types including: Editorials, Invited Reviews, Mini Reviews, Original Articles, Clinical Guidelines, Technological Notes, Imaging in thoracic cancer, Meeting Reports, Case Reports, Letters to the Editor, Commentaries, and Brief Reports.