Current Status and Influencing Factors of Decisional Conflict in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Systemic Therapy: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Weicai Su, Jinping Li, Minfeng Zhai, Panrong Wang, Yang Zhao, Xuenan Hu, Yan Wang
{"title":"Current Status and Influencing Factors of Decisional Conflict in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Systemic Therapy: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.","authors":"Weicai Su, Jinping Li, Minfeng Zhai, Panrong Wang, Yang Zhao, Xuenan Hu, Yan Wang","doi":"10.1111/1759-7714.70150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the current status of decisional conflict in lung cancer patients receiving systemic therapy and to analyze its influencing factors, with the aim of providing a basis for developing decision support strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From August to September 2024, a convenience sample of 500 patients receiving systemic therapy for lung cancer at the Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, was surveyed. Data were collected using a general information questionnaire, the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), Cancer Patient's Involvement in Treatment Decision-Making Scale (CPITDM), Preparation for Decision-Making Scale (PreDM), and Decisional Regret Scale (DRS).</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The mean DCS score was 47.28 ± 15.83, with subscale scores ranking from highest to lowest as decision support/effectiveness, decision uncertainty, and information/values. The mean CPITDM, PreDM, and DRS scores were 28.56 ± 3.91, 63.02 ± 11.65, and 9.46 ± 2.62, respectively. DCS was negatively correlated with CPITDM (r = -0.188, p < 0.001) and PreDM (r = -0.303, p < 0.001) but positively correlated with DRS (r = 0.342, p < 0.001). Multiple regression identified occupation, medical payment, treatment line, pathology, medication type, patient involvement, and preparedness as significant influencing factors (p < 0.05), explaining 59.9% of variance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lung cancer patients receiving systemic therapy experience a relatively high level of decisional conflict, with many exhibiting delayed decision-making. Healthcare providers should identify high-risk patients early based on key influencing factors and explore practical clinical decision support interventions. Enhancing decision readiness and reducing decision regret may help to improve quality of life and reduce decisional conflict.</p>","PeriodicalId":23338,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic Cancer","volume":"16 16","pages":"e70150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12356992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70150","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the current status of decisional conflict in lung cancer patients receiving systemic therapy and to analyze its influencing factors, with the aim of providing a basis for developing decision support strategies.

Methods: From August to September 2024, a convenience sample of 500 patients receiving systemic therapy for lung cancer at the Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, was surveyed. Data were collected using a general information questionnaire, the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), Cancer Patient's Involvement in Treatment Decision-Making Scale (CPITDM), Preparation for Decision-Making Scale (PreDM), and Decisional Regret Scale (DRS).

Result: The mean DCS score was 47.28 ± 15.83, with subscale scores ranking from highest to lowest as decision support/effectiveness, decision uncertainty, and information/values. The mean CPITDM, PreDM, and DRS scores were 28.56 ± 3.91, 63.02 ± 11.65, and 9.46 ± 2.62, respectively. DCS was negatively correlated with CPITDM (r = -0.188, p < 0.001) and PreDM (r = -0.303, p < 0.001) but positively correlated with DRS (r = 0.342, p < 0.001). Multiple regression identified occupation, medical payment, treatment line, pathology, medication type, patient involvement, and preparedness as significant influencing factors (p < 0.05), explaining 59.9% of variance.

Conclusion: Lung cancer patients receiving systemic therapy experience a relatively high level of decisional conflict, with many exhibiting delayed decision-making. Healthcare providers should identify high-risk patients early based on key influencing factors and explore practical clinical decision support interventions. Enhancing decision readiness and reducing decision regret may help to improve quality of life and reduce decisional conflict.

肺癌患者接受全身治疗的决策冲突现状及影响因素:一项横断面分析。
目的:了解肺癌全身治疗患者决策冲突的现状,分析其影响因素,为制定决策支持策略提供依据。方法:于2024年8月至9月对中国医学科学院肿瘤医院肿瘤内科接受全身治疗的肺癌患者500例进行方便抽样调查。采用一般信息问卷、决策冲突量表(DCS)、癌症患者参与治疗决策量表(CPITDM)、决策准备量表(PreDM)和决策后悔量表(DRS)收集数据。结果:DCS平均得分为47.28±15.83分,各分量表得分由高到低依次为决策支持/有效性、决策不确定性、信息/价值。CPITDM、PreDM和DRS的平均评分分别为28.56±3.91、63.02±11.65和9.46±2.62。DCS与CPITDM呈负相关(r = -0.188, p)。结论:接受全身治疗的肺癌患者存在较高水平的决策冲突,许多患者表现为决策延迟。医疗服务提供者应根据关键影响因素及早识别高危患者,并探索实用的临床决策支持干预措施。提高决策准备和减少决策后悔可能有助于提高生活质量和减少决策冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thoracic Cancer
Thoracic Cancer ONCOLOGY-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
439
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Thoracic Cancer aims to facilitate international collaboration and exchange of comprehensive and cutting-edge information on basic, translational, and applied clinical research in lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mediastinal cancer, breast cancer and other thoracic malignancies. Prevention, treatment and research relevant to Asia-Pacific is a focus area, but submissions from all regions are welcomed. The editors encourage contributions relevant to prevention, general thoracic surgery, medical oncology, radiology, radiation medicine, pathology, basic cancer research, as well as epidemiological and translational studies in thoracic cancer. Thoracic Cancer is the official publication of the Chinese Society of Lung Cancer, International Chinese Society of Thoracic Surgery and is endorsed by the Korean Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society. The Journal publishes a range of article types including: Editorials, Invited Reviews, Mini Reviews, Original Articles, Clinical Guidelines, Technological Notes, Imaging in thoracic cancer, Meeting Reports, Case Reports, Letters to the Editor, Commentaries, and Brief Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信