Electronic cigarettes and pregnancy: A social media content analysis.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Grace Kong, Rachel R Ouellette, Amanda de la Noval, Christina N Kyriakos, Vanessa Ponte, Elise E DeVito
{"title":"Electronic cigarettes and pregnancy: A social media content analysis.","authors":"Grace Kong, Rachel R Ouellette, Amanda de la Noval, Christina N Kyriakos, Vanessa Ponte, Elise E DeVito","doi":"10.1016/j.ypmed.2025.108387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use during pregnancy is a polarizing and complex public health topic. We examined social media content on e-cigarette use during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We content analyzed 170 TikTok posts about e-cigarettes and pregnancy in 2023. We coded message valence (anti-, pro-, mixed/unclear/neutral), messenger characteristics (age, gender, pregnancy status, healthcare provider status, e-cigarette and cigarette use), geographic origin, and engagement metrics (likes, favorites, shares, downloads, comments, followers). We assessed whether engagement and message valence differed by messenger and post characteristics using Chi-Square and Kruskal-Wallis tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Posts included 55 % (n = 93) anti-, 32.4 % (n = 55) mixed/unclear/neutral, and 12.9 % (n = 22) pro-e-cigarette use during pregnancy messages. Messenger characteristics included 90.6 % (n = 144) female, 53.5 % (n = 85) 18 to 30 years old, 40.9 % (n = 65) pregnant, 7.5 % (n = 12) healthcare providers. Geographic origin included 66.5 % (n = 113) from the United States and 22.9 % (n = 39) from the United Kingdom. Engagement was high, with some videos receiving over 2 million \"plays\" and 500 thousand \"likes.\" Posts by healthcare providers and messengers over 45 years old had more followers (ps < 0.001). Posts with messengers who quit e-cigarettes, from the US, and 18-45 years old were more likely to contain anti-e-cigarette content, whereas posts from the United Kingdom were more likely to have pro-e-cigarette content (ps ≤ 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A wide range of content on e-cigarette use and pregnancy was observed on TikTok. Future research is needed to understand how pregnant individuals navigate this content. Healthcare providers may be effective messengers for promoting e-cigarette cessation during pregnancy on social media.</p>","PeriodicalId":20339,"journal":{"name":"Preventive medicine","volume":" ","pages":"108387"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2025.108387","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use during pregnancy is a polarizing and complex public health topic. We examined social media content on e-cigarette use during pregnancy.

Methods: We content analyzed 170 TikTok posts about e-cigarettes and pregnancy in 2023. We coded message valence (anti-, pro-, mixed/unclear/neutral), messenger characteristics (age, gender, pregnancy status, healthcare provider status, e-cigarette and cigarette use), geographic origin, and engagement metrics (likes, favorites, shares, downloads, comments, followers). We assessed whether engagement and message valence differed by messenger and post characteristics using Chi-Square and Kruskal-Wallis tests.

Results: Posts included 55 % (n = 93) anti-, 32.4 % (n = 55) mixed/unclear/neutral, and 12.9 % (n = 22) pro-e-cigarette use during pregnancy messages. Messenger characteristics included 90.6 % (n = 144) female, 53.5 % (n = 85) 18 to 30 years old, 40.9 % (n = 65) pregnant, 7.5 % (n = 12) healthcare providers. Geographic origin included 66.5 % (n = 113) from the United States and 22.9 % (n = 39) from the United Kingdom. Engagement was high, with some videos receiving over 2 million "plays" and 500 thousand "likes." Posts by healthcare providers and messengers over 45 years old had more followers (ps < 0.001). Posts with messengers who quit e-cigarettes, from the US, and 18-45 years old were more likely to contain anti-e-cigarette content, whereas posts from the United Kingdom were more likely to have pro-e-cigarette content (ps ≤ 0.001).

Conclusions: A wide range of content on e-cigarette use and pregnancy was observed on TikTok. Future research is needed to understand how pregnant individuals navigate this content. Healthcare providers may be effective messengers for promoting e-cigarette cessation during pregnancy on social media.

电子烟与怀孕:一项社交媒体内容分析。
目的:孕期使用电子烟是一个两极分化且复杂的公共卫生话题。我们研究了怀孕期间使用电子烟的社交媒体内容。方法:我们对2023年TikTok上170篇关于电子烟和怀孕的帖子进行了内容分析。我们对信息的价值(反对、支持、混合/不明确/中立)、信息特征(年龄、性别、怀孕状况、医疗服务提供者状况、电子烟和香烟使用)、地理来源和参与指标(喜欢、收藏、分享、下载、评论、关注者)进行了编码。我们使用卡方检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验来评估参与和信息效价是否因信使和帖子特征而不同。结果:文章包括55 % (n = 93)反,32.4 % (n = 55)混合/不清楚/中性,和12.9 % (n = 22)怀孕期间pro-e-cigarette使用消息。信使特征包括90.6 % (n = 144)女,53.5 % (n = 85)18到30 岁40.9 % (n = 65)怀孕了,7.5 % (n = 12)卫生保健提供者。地理来源包括66.5 % (n = 113)来自美国,22.9 % (n = 39)来自英国。用户参与度很高,一些视频获得了超过200万次“播放”和50万次“赞”。结论:在TikTok上观察到有关电子烟使用和怀孕的广泛内容。未来的研究需要了解孕妇如何浏览这些内容。医疗保健提供者可能是在社交媒体上宣传怀孕期间戒烟电子烟的有效信使。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Preventive medicine
Preventive medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1972 by Ernst Wynder, Preventive Medicine is an international scholarly journal that provides prompt publication of original articles on the science and practice of disease prevention, health promotion, and public health policymaking. Preventive Medicine aims to reward innovation. It will favor insightful observational studies, thoughtful explorations of health data, unsuspected new angles for existing hypotheses, robust randomized controlled trials, and impartial systematic reviews. Preventive Medicine''s ultimate goal is to publish research that will have an impact on the work of practitioners of disease prevention and health promotion, as well as of related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信