Efficacy of double anastomosis STA-MCA bypass in adult Moyamoya disease and cerebral atherosclerosis disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Bryan Gervais de Liyis, Muhammad Kusdiansah, Affan Priyambodo Permana, Made Gemma Daniswara Maliawan, I Wayan Niryana, Arnau Benet, Rokuya Tanikawa
{"title":"Efficacy of double anastomosis STA-MCA bypass in adult Moyamoya disease and cerebral atherosclerosis disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Bryan Gervais de Liyis, Muhammad Kusdiansah, Affan Priyambodo Permana, Made Gemma Daniswara Maliawan, I Wayan Niryana, Arnau Benet, Rokuya Tanikawa","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03760-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Double anastomosis Superficial Temporal Artery-Middle Cerebral Artery (STA-MCA) bypass in Moyamoya disease (MMD) and cerebral atherosclerosis disease (CAD) remains underexplored. We aim to evaluate the clinical efficacy and vascular dynamics of double anastomosis STA-MCA bypass in each group, MMD and CAD. A systematic search was conducted in ScienceDirect, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases until September 2024. Efficacy outcomes included stroke occurrences, patency, modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and complications. Vascular parameters included cerebral blood flow (CBF), cut flow index (CFI), MCA perfusion, and mean transit time (MTT). The meta-analysis included 15 studies with 417 patients (46.18 ± 4.69 years). At final follow-up, the MMD group showed lower total stroke (12 ± 7% vs. 20 ± 9%; p = 0.63), ischemic stroke (8 ± 5% vs. 18 ± 8%; p = 0.26), hemorrhagic stroke (4 ± 3% vs. 10 ± 7%; p = 0.49), and patency (85 ± 11% vs. 98 ± 8%; p = 0.10) compared to CAD group, without statistical difference. The MMD group exhibited reduced mRS (MD: -0.57; 95%CI: -0.95 to -0.19; p = 0.003), increased CBF (MD: 14.75; 95%CI: 2.32 to 27.19; p = 0.020), and increased MCA perfusion (MD: 9.28; 95%CI: 1.19 to 17.37; p = 0.025). CFI (1.30 ± 0.11 vs. 1.08 ± 0.13; p = 0.02) and MTT (4.49 ± 0.5 vs. 1.27 ± 0.27; p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the CAD group. Both 1D2R (MD: 27.59; 95%CI: 4.88 to 50.30; p = 0.017) and 2D2R (MD: 14.75; 95%CI: 2.32 to 27.19; p = 0.020) techniques exhibited increase in CBF. Additionally, double anastomosis showed a higher CFI compared to single anastomosis (MD: 0.25; 95%CI: 0.12-0.38; p < 0.001). Double anastomosis STA-MCA bypass demonstrated comparable stroke and patency rates between groups. MMD patients had significantly higher CFI and MTT values, with double anastomosis yielding superior CFI compared to single anastomosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"605"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03760-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Double anastomosis Superficial Temporal Artery-Middle Cerebral Artery (STA-MCA) bypass in Moyamoya disease (MMD) and cerebral atherosclerosis disease (CAD) remains underexplored. We aim to evaluate the clinical efficacy and vascular dynamics of double anastomosis STA-MCA bypass in each group, MMD and CAD. A systematic search was conducted in ScienceDirect, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases until September 2024. Efficacy outcomes included stroke occurrences, patency, modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and complications. Vascular parameters included cerebral blood flow (CBF), cut flow index (CFI), MCA perfusion, and mean transit time (MTT). The meta-analysis included 15 studies with 417 patients (46.18 ± 4.69 years). At final follow-up, the MMD group showed lower total stroke (12 ± 7% vs. 20 ± 9%; p = 0.63), ischemic stroke (8 ± 5% vs. 18 ± 8%; p = 0.26), hemorrhagic stroke (4 ± 3% vs. 10 ± 7%; p = 0.49), and patency (85 ± 11% vs. 98 ± 8%; p = 0.10) compared to CAD group, without statistical difference. The MMD group exhibited reduced mRS (MD: -0.57; 95%CI: -0.95 to -0.19; p = 0.003), increased CBF (MD: 14.75; 95%CI: 2.32 to 27.19; p = 0.020), and increased MCA perfusion (MD: 9.28; 95%CI: 1.19 to 17.37; p = 0.025). CFI (1.30 ± 0.11 vs. 1.08 ± 0.13; p = 0.02) and MTT (4.49 ± 0.5 vs. 1.27 ± 0.27; p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the CAD group. Both 1D2R (MD: 27.59; 95%CI: 4.88 to 50.30; p = 0.017) and 2D2R (MD: 14.75; 95%CI: 2.32 to 27.19; p = 0.020) techniques exhibited increase in CBF. Additionally, double anastomosis showed a higher CFI compared to single anastomosis (MD: 0.25; 95%CI: 0.12-0.38; p < 0.001). Double anastomosis STA-MCA bypass demonstrated comparable stroke and patency rates between groups. MMD patients had significantly higher CFI and MTT values, with double anastomosis yielding superior CFI compared to single anastomosis.

双吻合STA-MCA旁路治疗成人烟雾病和脑动脉粥样硬化疾病的疗效:系统回顾和meta分析。
双吻合颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉(STA-MCA)旁路在烟雾病(MMD)和脑动脉粥样硬化病(CAD)中的应用尚不充分。我们旨在评价STA-MCA双吻合术在各组、烟雾病组和冠心病组的临床疗效和血管动力学。在ScienceDirect, Embase, PubMed和Cochrane数据库中进行了系统检索,直到2024年9月。疗效指标包括卒中发生率、通畅度、改良兰金量表(mRS)和并发症。血管参数包括脑血流(CBF)、切断血流指数(CFI)、MCA灌注、平均传递时间(MTT)。meta分析纳入15项研究,417例患者(46.18±4.69年)。在最后随访时,烟雾病组总卒中发生率较低(12±7% vs. 20±9%);P = 0.63),缺血性卒中(8±5% vs. 18±8%;p = 0.26)、出血性中风(4±3%和10±7%;P = 0.49),通畅度(85±11% vs 98±8%;p = 0.10),与CAD组比较,差异无统计学意义。MMD组mRS降低(MD: -0.57;95%CI: -0.95 ~ -0.19;p = 0.003), CBF增加(MD: 14.75;95%CI: 2.32 ~ 27.19;p = 0.020), MCA灌注增加(MD: 9.28;95%CI: 1.19 ~ 17.37;p = 0.025)。CFI(1.30±0.11∶1.08±0.13);p = 0.02)和MTT(4.49±0.5∶1.27±0.27;p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信