Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Spectrum: A Proposed Standardized Classification and Terminology for the Reporting of Pregnancy Developing in Uterine Cesarean Scar.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Ilan E Timor-Tritsch, Francesco D'Antonio, Anam Monteagudo, Andrea Kaelin Agten, Yaakov Melcer, Ron Maymon
{"title":"Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Spectrum: A Proposed Standardized Classification and Terminology for the Reporting of Pregnancy Developing in Uterine Cesarean Scar.","authors":"Ilan E Timor-Tritsch, Francesco D'Antonio, Anam Monteagudo, Andrea Kaelin Agten, Yaakov Melcer, Ron Maymon","doi":"10.1002/jum.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article contains the academic, but more importantly clinical debate of the terminology of pregnancies after cesarean deliveries, namely cesarean scar pregnancies as well as increasingly relevant social aspects determining their management. Its main purpose is to offer a solution to the controversy created by the debate about the terminology of pregnancies implanted in, or on the uterine scar left behind by a cesarean delivery. The 2 opposing terms creating the argument are: cesarean scar pregnancy and cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. They seem to exhibit a spectrum of different pathophysiologic properties and outcomes with different outcomes almost regardless of their expectant or surgically management. Based upon the above and modeled by the creation of the entity called \"placenta accreta spectrum\" which also contains clinico-pathologically slightly but different entities, we suggest unifying the terminology of cesarean scar pregnancies. By creating an all-encompassing term: cesarean scar pregnancy spectrum that includes the different presentations, various levels of their clinical severities and associated complications. Categorizing cesarean scar pregnancies as \"on-scar cesarean scar pregnancy (oCSP)\" and cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy (CSeP), distinguishes the clinical presentation and risk stratification. While all CSPs carry risk, this not only will make the reporting to permit some shared decision-making for expectant management of oCSP, but also will better inform the patient of the potential risk and the treatment for CSeP depending on which end of the spectrum the cesarean scar pregnancy was found.</p>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.70034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article contains the academic, but more importantly clinical debate of the terminology of pregnancies after cesarean deliveries, namely cesarean scar pregnancies as well as increasingly relevant social aspects determining their management. Its main purpose is to offer a solution to the controversy created by the debate about the terminology of pregnancies implanted in, or on the uterine scar left behind by a cesarean delivery. The 2 opposing terms creating the argument are: cesarean scar pregnancy and cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. They seem to exhibit a spectrum of different pathophysiologic properties and outcomes with different outcomes almost regardless of their expectant or surgically management. Based upon the above and modeled by the creation of the entity called "placenta accreta spectrum" which also contains clinico-pathologically slightly but different entities, we suggest unifying the terminology of cesarean scar pregnancies. By creating an all-encompassing term: cesarean scar pregnancy spectrum that includes the different presentations, various levels of their clinical severities and associated complications. Categorizing cesarean scar pregnancies as "on-scar cesarean scar pregnancy (oCSP)" and cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy (CSeP), distinguishes the clinical presentation and risk stratification. While all CSPs carry risk, this not only will make the reporting to permit some shared decision-making for expectant management of oCSP, but also will better inform the patient of the potential risk and the treatment for CSeP depending on which end of the spectrum the cesarean scar pregnancy was found.

剖宫产瘢痕妊娠谱:子宫剖宫产瘢痕妊娠报告的标准化分类和术语。
这篇文章包含了学术界,但更重要的是临床讨论剖宫产后妊娠的术语,即剖宫产疤痕妊娠,以及越来越相关的社会因素决定其管理。它的主要目的是为剖宫产后留下的子宫瘢痕植入妊娠的术语争论提供一个解决方案。引起争论的两个对立术语是:剖宫产疤痕妊娠和剖宫产疤痕异位妊娠。他们似乎表现出一系列不同的病理生理特性和结果,几乎与他们的预期或手术治疗无关。在此基础上,通过创建一个名为“胎盘增生谱”的实体来建模,该实体也包含临床病理上轻微但不同的实体,我们建议统一剖宫产疤痕妊娠的术语。通过创建一个包涵一切的术语:剖宫产疤痕妊娠谱,包括不同的表现,不同程度的临床严重程度和相关并发症。将剖宫产瘢痕妊娠分为“瘢痕上剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(oCSP)”和剖宫产瘢痕异位妊娠(CSeP),区分临床表现和风险分层。虽然所有的csp都有风险,但这不仅可以使报告为oCSP的预期管理提供一些共同的决策,而且可以更好地告知患者CSeP的潜在风险和治疗方法,这取决于发现剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的哪一端。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
205
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community. Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to: -Basic Science- Breast Ultrasound- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound- Dermatology- Echocardiography- Elastography- Emergency Medicine- Fetal Echocardiography- Gastrointestinal Ultrasound- General and Abdominal Ultrasound- Genitourinary Ultrasound- Gynecologic Ultrasound- Head and Neck Ultrasound- High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging- Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound- Neurosonology- Obstetric Ultrasound- Ophthalmologic Ultrasound- Pediatric Ultrasound- Point-of-Care Ultrasound- Public Policy- Superficial Structures- Therapeutic Ultrasound- Ultrasound Education- Ultrasound in Global Health- Urologic Ultrasound- Vascular Ultrasound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信