Efficacy and safety of fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant (0.2 µg/day) in patients with post-surgical inflammation associated with macular edema: a case series study.

IF 2.3 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Maria Madeira, Ana Cabugueira, Helena Urbano, Miguel Cordeiro, Marta Guedes
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant (0.2 µg/day) in patients with post-surgical inflammation associated with macular edema: a case series study.","authors":"Maria Madeira, Ana Cabugueira, Helena Urbano, Miguel Cordeiro, Marta Guedes","doi":"10.1186/s12348-025-00503-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative cystoid macular edema (PCME) is a primary cause of reduced vision following both cataract and/or vitreoretinal surgery, which may spontaneously resolve. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal (FAc) implant (0.2 µg/day) in patients with refractory PCME.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, non-interventional, and single center study conducted on patients with PCME treated with 0.2 µg/day FAc implant. All the patients received previous treatment with topical corticosteroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), triancinolone injection and dexamethasone implant. The primary end-points were the mean change in best-corrected-visual-acuity (BCVA) and the proportion of patients gaining ≥ 15 letters from baseline to the last follow-up visit. The secondary endpoints included the mean CRT reduction and the mean intraocular pressure (IOP) during the 36 months study period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight eyes from 8 patients were included in the study. Median (95% Confidence-interval) BCVA was significantly improved from 60.0 (50.05-69.95) letters at baseline to 80.15 (77.25-85.00) letters at month-36, p = 0.043. At the last follow-up visit, 5 (62.5%) eyes gained ≥ 15 letters, without any eye experiencing a loss of BCVA compared to baseline. There was significant CRT reduction from baseline (median: 497.5 μm; 95%CI: 380.0-596.0 μm) to month-36 (Median: 252.0 μm; 95%CI: 242.0-268.0 μm); p = 0.012. Regarding safety, IOP remained stable from baseline (median: 14.5mmHg; 95%Confidence-interval: 12.0-23.0 mmHg) to the last follow-up visit (median: 13.5mmHg; 95% Confidence-interval: 9.0-19.0 mm Hg); p = 0.123.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FAc implant significantly improved both visual and anatomic outcomes, and was effective in preventing recurrences, while maintaining a reasonable safety profile, in PCME refractory to intravitreal triancinolone and dexamethasone.</p>","PeriodicalId":16600,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection","volume":"15 1","pages":"61"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12356776/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12348-025-00503-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postoperative cystoid macular edema (PCME) is a primary cause of reduced vision following both cataract and/or vitreoretinal surgery, which may spontaneously resolve. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal (FAc) implant (0.2 µg/day) in patients with refractory PCME.

Methods: Retrospective, non-interventional, and single center study conducted on patients with PCME treated with 0.2 µg/day FAc implant. All the patients received previous treatment with topical corticosteroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), triancinolone injection and dexamethasone implant. The primary end-points were the mean change in best-corrected-visual-acuity (BCVA) and the proportion of patients gaining ≥ 15 letters from baseline to the last follow-up visit. The secondary endpoints included the mean CRT reduction and the mean intraocular pressure (IOP) during the 36 months study period.

Results: Eight eyes from 8 patients were included in the study. Median (95% Confidence-interval) BCVA was significantly improved from 60.0 (50.05-69.95) letters at baseline to 80.15 (77.25-85.00) letters at month-36, p = 0.043. At the last follow-up visit, 5 (62.5%) eyes gained ≥ 15 letters, without any eye experiencing a loss of BCVA compared to baseline. There was significant CRT reduction from baseline (median: 497.5 μm; 95%CI: 380.0-596.0 μm) to month-36 (Median: 252.0 μm; 95%CI: 242.0-268.0 μm); p = 0.012. Regarding safety, IOP remained stable from baseline (median: 14.5mmHg; 95%Confidence-interval: 12.0-23.0 mmHg) to the last follow-up visit (median: 13.5mmHg; 95% Confidence-interval: 9.0-19.0 mm Hg); p = 0.123.

Conclusions: The FAc implant significantly improved both visual and anatomic outcomes, and was effective in preventing recurrences, while maintaining a reasonable safety profile, in PCME refractory to intravitreal triancinolone and dexamethasone.

醋酸氟西诺酮玻璃体内植入(0.2µg/天)治疗黄斑水肿术后炎症患者的疗效和安全性:一项病例系列研究
背景:术后囊样黄斑水肿(PCME)是白内障和/或玻璃体视网膜手术后视力下降的主要原因,可自行消退。本研究旨在评价氟西诺酮玻璃体内(FAc)植入物(0.2µg/天)在难治性PCME患者中的有效性和安全性。方法:对0.2µg/d FAc种植体治疗PCME患者进行回顾性、非介入性、单中心研究。所有患者既往均接受外用皮质类固醇、非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)、曲安奈洛酮注射液和地塞米松植入治疗。主要终点是最佳矫正视力(BCVA)的平均变化和从基线到最后一次随访获得≥15个字母的患者比例。次要终点包括在36个月的研究期间平均CRT降低和平均眼压(IOP)。结果:8例患者8只眼纳入研究。中位数(95%置信区间)BCVA从基线时的60.0(50.05-69.95)个字母显著改善至36个月时的80.15(77.25-85.00)个字母,p = 0.043。在最后一次随访时,5只(62.5%)眼睛的BCVA增加≥15个字母,与基线相比,没有任何一只眼睛出现BCVA丧失。与基线相比,CRT显着降低(中位数:497.5 μm;95%CI: 380.0-596.0 μm)至第36个月(中位数:252.0 μm;95%CI: 242.0 ~ 268.0 μm);p = 0.012。关于安全性,IOP从基线保持稳定(中位数:14.5mmHg;95%置信区间:12.0-23.0 mmHg)至最后一次随访(中位数:13.5mmHg;95%置信区间:9.0-19.0 mm Hg);p = 0.123。结论:FAc植入体显著改善了视觉和解剖结果,并有效预防复发,同时保持了合理的安全性,对于玻璃体内曲安奈洛酮和地塞米松难治性PCME。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
39
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信