Impact of barbed suture use in complex back closure on operative time, cost, and safety profile.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Stephanie Francalancia, Carole S L Spake, Luke Soliman, Julia L Lerner, Nikhil Sobti, Vinay Rao, Daniel Kwan, Paul Y Liu, Albert S Woo
{"title":"Impact of barbed suture use in complex back closure on operative time, cost, and safety profile.","authors":"Stephanie Francalancia, Carole S L Spake, Luke Soliman, Julia L Lerner, Nikhil Sobti, Vinay Rao, Daniel Kwan, Paul Y Liu, Albert S Woo","doi":"10.3171/2025.4.SPINE241540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Complex locoregional closure of back wounds following spine surgery via muscle flap closure, as opposed to traditional layer-by-layer approximation, decreases rates of complications such as seroma, infection, and dehiscence. However, the impact of barbed suture use on operative time, surgical cost, and patient outcomes for these cases remains unknown. In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the complication profile, time, and cost savings of barbed suture in complex flap closure of back wounds following the placement of spinal instrumentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An IRB-approved retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of all patients who underwent spine surgery followed by locoregional muscle flap complex closure at the authors' institution between January 2016 and July 2021. Patients were in either the barbed or conventional suture cohort. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were computed using multivariable logistic regression with Firth's correction. Estimated cost savings were calculated using literature-reported figures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 110 patients with comparable baseline demographics were included. Rates of seroma (p > 0.99), infection (p = 0.21), and dehiscence (p = 0.66) were statistically similar between groups. After adjusting for the length of surgical closure, the mean times were 3.1 mins/cm and 4.6 mins/cm for the barbed and conventional suture cohorts, respectively, resulting in a time savings of 1.5 mins/cm (p < 0.001). The calculated time savings for muscle flap closure of an average incision length was 34.5 minutes (95% CI 18.6-50.4 minutes), and the overall financial savings were calculated to be $1094.10 (95% CI $513.75-$1674.45) per case.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Knotless barbed suture use in complex closure of back wounds results in decreased operative time and hospital cost while conferring similar complication rates to conventional suture.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.4.SPINE241540","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Complex locoregional closure of back wounds following spine surgery via muscle flap closure, as opposed to traditional layer-by-layer approximation, decreases rates of complications such as seroma, infection, and dehiscence. However, the impact of barbed suture use on operative time, surgical cost, and patient outcomes for these cases remains unknown. In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the complication profile, time, and cost savings of barbed suture in complex flap closure of back wounds following the placement of spinal instrumentation.

Methods: An IRB-approved retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of all patients who underwent spine surgery followed by locoregional muscle flap complex closure at the authors' institution between January 2016 and July 2021. Patients were in either the barbed or conventional suture cohort. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were computed using multivariable logistic regression with Firth's correction. Estimated cost savings were calculated using literature-reported figures.

Results: A total of 110 patients with comparable baseline demographics were included. Rates of seroma (p > 0.99), infection (p = 0.21), and dehiscence (p = 0.66) were statistically similar between groups. After adjusting for the length of surgical closure, the mean times were 3.1 mins/cm and 4.6 mins/cm for the barbed and conventional suture cohorts, respectively, resulting in a time savings of 1.5 mins/cm (p < 0.001). The calculated time savings for muscle flap closure of an average incision length was 34.5 minutes (95% CI 18.6-50.4 minutes), and the overall financial savings were calculated to be $1094.10 (95% CI $513.75-$1674.45) per case.

Conclusions: Knotless barbed suture use in complex closure of back wounds results in decreased operative time and hospital cost while conferring similar complication rates to conventional suture.

复杂背部闭合中使用倒刺缝线对手术时间、成本和安全性的影响。
目的:与传统的逐层逼近相比,通过肌肉瓣闭合脊柱手术后背部伤口的复杂局部区域闭合可以降低血肿、感染和裂开等并发症的发生率。然而,在这些病例中,使用倒钩缝合对手术时间、手术费用和患者预后的影响尚不清楚。在这项研究中,作者的目的是评估在放置脊柱内固定后的背部伤口复杂皮瓣闭合中,倒刺缝合的并发症概况、时间和成本节约。方法:对2016年1月至2021年7月在作者所在机构接受脊柱手术后局部区域肌肉瓣复合闭合的所有患者的病历进行回顾性分析。患者分为倒钩缝线组和常规缝线组。比值比和95%置信区间采用Firth校正的多变量logistic回归计算。估计节省的费用是根据文献报道的数字计算的。结果:总共纳入了110例具有可比基线人口统计学特征的患者。血清肿率(p = 0.99)、感染率(p = 0.21)、裂开率(p = 0.66)组间比较,差异有统计学意义。调整手术闭合长度后,倒钩缝合组和常规缝合组的平均时间分别为3.1分钟/厘米和4.6分钟/厘米,节省了1.5分钟/厘米的时间(p < 0.001)。计算出平均切口长度的肌肉瓣关闭节省的时间为34.5分钟(95% CI 18.6-50.4分钟),计算出每个病例的总体经济节省为1094.10美元(95% CI 513.75- 1674.45美元)。结论:无结倒刺缝合用于复杂的背部伤口缝合,可减少手术时间和住院费用,并发症发生率与常规缝合相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信