Clinical Judgement, Treatment Decisions and Frailty Management in Older Cancer Patients: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Experiences of Radiation Therapy Staff.

IF 2 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Sofia Axelsson, Per Fessé, Per Fransson, Agneta Schröder, Antonis Valachis, Emma Ohlsson-Nevo
{"title":"Clinical Judgement, Treatment Decisions and Frailty Management in Older Cancer Patients: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Experiences of Radiation Therapy Staff.","authors":"Sofia Axelsson, Per Fessé, Per Fransson, Agneta Schröder, Antonis Valachis, Emma Ohlsson-Nevo","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Treatment of older cancer patients can be complex due to frailty that comes with age, and the benefits of radiation therapy for frail older patients are unclear. Radiation therapy staff play a crucial role in identifying and monitoring frailty and tailoring treatment. Research on radiation therapy in frail older patients is limited, and frailty assessments are not widely used in routine care. Understanding staff experiences with clinical judgement and frailty assessment is important for effective treatment. This study explored the radiation therapy staff's experiences of clinical judgement, treatment decision-making, and managing frail older cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study has an inductive design in which 12 specialist oncology nurses and four clinical oncologists working with cancer patients at four radiation therapy units across four counties in Sweden were interviewed. In total, 16 participants were interviewed for the study. Data were collected in semi-structured individual interviews and were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes were identified from the interview analysis: Putting the patient first, Care with integrity and humanity and Receiving support in treatment decisions, along with nine sub-themes. None of the participants was using any structured instrument for assessing frailty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Radiation therapy staff face significant and complex challenges when treating frail older cancer patients, which can lead to feelings of doubt and powerlessness. Awareness and use of structured frailty assessment are limited. Integrating structured frailty assessment could address the complex challenges experienced by staff by improving decision-making, communication, and patient outcomes, contributing to more ethical and person-centred care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.70017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Treatment of older cancer patients can be complex due to frailty that comes with age, and the benefits of radiation therapy for frail older patients are unclear. Radiation therapy staff play a crucial role in identifying and monitoring frailty and tailoring treatment. Research on radiation therapy in frail older patients is limited, and frailty assessments are not widely used in routine care. Understanding staff experiences with clinical judgement and frailty assessment is important for effective treatment. This study explored the radiation therapy staff's experiences of clinical judgement, treatment decision-making, and managing frail older cancer patients.

Methods: The study has an inductive design in which 12 specialist oncology nurses and four clinical oncologists working with cancer patients at four radiation therapy units across four counties in Sweden were interviewed. In total, 16 participants were interviewed for the study. Data were collected in semi-structured individual interviews and were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Three themes were identified from the interview analysis: Putting the patient first, Care with integrity and humanity and Receiving support in treatment decisions, along with nine sub-themes. None of the participants was using any structured instrument for assessing frailty.

Conclusions: Radiation therapy staff face significant and complex challenges when treating frail older cancer patients, which can lead to feelings of doubt and powerlessness. Awareness and use of structured frailty assessment are limited. Integrating structured frailty assessment could address the complex challenges experienced by staff by improving decision-making, communication, and patient outcomes, contributing to more ethical and person-centred care.

老年肿瘤患者的临床判断、治疗决策与衰弱管理:一项探讨放射治疗人员经验的定性研究。
导读:老年癌症患者的治疗可能会很复杂,因为随着年龄的增长,身体会变得虚弱,而放射治疗对虚弱的老年患者的益处尚不清楚。放射治疗人员在识别和监测虚弱和定制治疗方面发挥着至关重要的作用。放射治疗在年老体弱患者中的研究是有限的,虚弱评估在常规护理中没有广泛使用。了解工作人员在临床判断和虚弱评估方面的经验对有效治疗很重要。本研究旨在探讨放射治疗人员在临床判断、治疗决策及管理体弱高龄癌症患者方面的经验。方法:本研究采用归纳设计,对瑞典4个县4个放射治疗单位的12名肿瘤专科护士和4名临床肿瘤学家进行了访谈。这项研究总共采访了16名参与者。数据在半结构化的个人访谈中收集,并使用反身性主题分析进行分析。结果:从访谈分析中确定了三个主题:将患者放在第一位,诚信和人性化的护理和在治疗决策中获得支持,以及九个子主题。没有一个参与者使用任何结构化的工具来评估脆弱性。结论:放射治疗人员在治疗虚弱的老年癌症患者时面临着重大而复杂的挑战,这可能导致怀疑和无力感。对结构化脆弱性评估的认识和使用是有限的。整合结构化的脆弱性评估可以通过改善决策、沟通和患者结果来解决工作人员面临的复杂挑战,有助于实现更合乎道德和以人为本的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
69
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences (JMRS) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal that accepts manuscripts related to medical imaging / diagnostic radiography, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, medical ultrasound / sonography, and the complementary disciplines of medical physics, radiology, radiation oncology, nursing, psychology and sociology. Manuscripts may take the form of: original articles, review articles, commentary articles, technical evaluations, case series and case studies. JMRS promotes excellence in international medical radiation science by the publication of contemporary and advanced research that encourages the adoption of the best clinical, scientific and educational practices in international communities. JMRS is the official professional journal of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) and the New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology (NZIMRT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信