Multisocietal Consensus on the use of Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC for the Treatment of Pseudomyxoma Peritonei: A GRADE Approach for Evidence Evaluation and Recommendation.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Shigeki Kusamura, Edward Levine, Michela Cinquini, Olivier Glehen, Pompiliu Piso, Andreas Brandl, Claudio Quadros, Marc Pocard, Faheez Mohamed, Clarice Eveno, Dario Baratti, Marcello Guaglio, Marcello Deraco, Brendan Moran
{"title":"Multisocietal Consensus on the use of Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC for the Treatment of Pseudomyxoma Peritonei: A GRADE Approach for Evidence Evaluation and Recommendation.","authors":"Shigeki Kusamura, Edward Levine, Michela Cinquini, Olivier Glehen, Pompiliu Piso, Andreas Brandl, Claudio Quadros, Marc Pocard, Faheez Mohamed, Clarice Eveno, Dario Baratti, Marcello Guaglio, Marcello Deraco, Brendan Moran","doi":"10.1002/jso.28167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare malignancy characterized by mucinous ascites and peritoneal implants, primarily arising from ruptured appendiceal neoplasms. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has become the preferred treatment for resectable and operable cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An international panel from the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI), the International Society for the Study of Pleura and Peritoneum (ISSPP), the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO), the European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO), and EURACAN used the GRADE methodology and ADOLOPMENT approach to adapt existing guidelines. Clinical questions were framed using the PICO framework, and systematic reviews were conducted. Evidence certainty and the balance of benefits and harms were evaluated with the Evidence-to-Decision framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A strong recommendation was made for CRS and HIPEC over debulking surgery for resectable PMP. Observational studies reported 5- and 10-year survival rates of 80% and 55%, respectively, with CRS and HIPEC, compared to lower outcomes with debulking. Despite the very low certainty of evidence, the panel strongly endorses CRS and HIPEC over debulking surgery. This recommendation is driven by PMP's known chemoresistance, the lack of viable alternative treatments, and the survival benefits observed in observational studies coming only from radical surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This consensus endorses CRS and HIPEC as the standard of care for operable and resectable PMP. This recommendation will increase acceptance and awareness among a broader audience of healthcare professionals about the potential benefits of this treatment in managing this rare peritoneal disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28167","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare malignancy characterized by mucinous ascites and peritoneal implants, primarily arising from ruptured appendiceal neoplasms. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has become the preferred treatment for resectable and operable cases.

Methods: An international panel from the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI), the International Society for the Study of Pleura and Peritoneum (ISSPP), the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO), the European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO), and EURACAN used the GRADE methodology and ADOLOPMENT approach to adapt existing guidelines. Clinical questions were framed using the PICO framework, and systematic reviews were conducted. Evidence certainty and the balance of benefits and harms were evaluated with the Evidence-to-Decision framework.

Results: A strong recommendation was made for CRS and HIPEC over debulking surgery for resectable PMP. Observational studies reported 5- and 10-year survival rates of 80% and 55%, respectively, with CRS and HIPEC, compared to lower outcomes with debulking. Despite the very low certainty of evidence, the panel strongly endorses CRS and HIPEC over debulking surgery. This recommendation is driven by PMP's known chemoresistance, the lack of viable alternative treatments, and the survival benefits observed in observational studies coming only from radical surgery.

Conclusion: This consensus endorses CRS and HIPEC as the standard of care for operable and resectable PMP. This recommendation will increase acceptance and awareness among a broader audience of healthcare professionals about the potential benefits of this treatment in managing this rare peritoneal disease.

关于使用细胞减少手术和HIPEC治疗腹膜假性黏液瘤的多社会共识:证据评估和推荐的分级方法。
腹膜假性黏液瘤(PMP)是一种罕见的恶性肿瘤,主要由阑尾肿瘤破裂引起,其特征为粘液性腹水和腹膜植入物。细胞减少手术(CRS)联合腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)已成为可切除和可手术病例的首选治疗方法。方法:由国际腹膜表面肿瘤组织(PSOGI)、国际胸膜和腹膜研究学会(ISSPP)、外科肿瘤学会(SSO)、欧洲外科肿瘤学会(ESSO)和EURACAN组成的国际小组使用GRADE方法和ADOLOPMENT方法来调整现有指南。临床问题采用PICO框架,并进行系统评价。用证据-决策框架评估证据确定性和利益与危害的平衡。结果:对于可切除的PMP,强烈建议采用CRS和HIPEC减容手术。观察性研究报告CRS和HIPEC的5年和10年生存率分别为80%和55%,而减积的结果较低。尽管证据的确定性非常低,但专家组强烈支持CRS和HIPEC而不是减脂手术。这一建议是由PMP已知的化疗耐药、缺乏可行的替代治疗以及观察性研究中仅来自根治性手术的生存益处所驱动的。结论:该共识支持CRS和HIPEC作为可手术和可切除PMP的护理标准。这一建议将提高更广泛的医疗保健专业人员对这种治疗在治疗这种罕见腹膜疾病中的潜在益处的接受度和认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信