Comparison of plantar pressure distribution patterns of patients with ankylosing spondylitis and asymptomatic healthy individuals: a cross-sectional study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nazli Cigercioglu, Zilan Bazancir-Apaydin, Gul Baltaci, Umut Kalyoncu, Hande Guney-Deniz
{"title":"Comparison of plantar pressure distribution patterns of patients with ankylosing spondylitis and asymptomatic healthy individuals: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Nazli Cigercioglu, Zilan Bazancir-Apaydin, Gul Baltaci, Umut Kalyoncu, Hande Guney-Deniz","doi":"10.1007/s11845-025-04064-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) is an inflammatory chronic disease that causes postural changes. As a result of these changes decreased hip flexion, increased knee flexion and plantar flexion of ankle are developed.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of the study is to compare plantar pressure distribution results in patients with AS and healthy individuals and to determine the relationship between clinical and functional parameters in patients with AS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-five patients (median age = 42.2 ± 2.1 years) with AS and 25 healthy individuals (median age = 44.4 ± 1.7 years) were included in the study. The maximum foot pressure (FP<sub>max</sub>), average pressure, center of pressure angle (CoP), forefoot load (FFL), rearfoot load (RFL), foot progression angle (FPA) and foot angle (FA) were determined by pedobarographic analysis. Spinal mobility was assessed with lumbar flexion, lateral flexion, and tragus-wall distance. Functional status and disease-related symptoms were assessed with BASDAI, BASFI and ASQoL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences between static and dynamic pedobarographic analysis parameters between the AS group and the control group (p > 0.05). Self-rated functional levels parameters, pain, and stiffness were higher in the AS group (p < 0.05). Lumbar flexion (p = 0.187) and tragus-to-wall distance (p = 0.196) were similar in two groups. Self-rated parameters were correlated with pain, stiffness, and lateral flexion (p < 0.05). Lateral flexion correlated with FA and FFL; tragus to wall distance correlated with FP<sub>max</sub> and CoP and RFL; lumbar flexion correlated with FA (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results showed that there was no difference plantar pressure distribution but there was a difference in spinal mobility in AS group compared healthy individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":14507,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-025-04064-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) is an inflammatory chronic disease that causes postural changes. As a result of these changes decreased hip flexion, increased knee flexion and plantar flexion of ankle are developed.

Aims: The aim of the study is to compare plantar pressure distribution results in patients with AS and healthy individuals and to determine the relationship between clinical and functional parameters in patients with AS.

Methods: Twenty-five patients (median age = 42.2 ± 2.1 years) with AS and 25 healthy individuals (median age = 44.4 ± 1.7 years) were included in the study. The maximum foot pressure (FPmax), average pressure, center of pressure angle (CoP), forefoot load (FFL), rearfoot load (RFL), foot progression angle (FPA) and foot angle (FA) were determined by pedobarographic analysis. Spinal mobility was assessed with lumbar flexion, lateral flexion, and tragus-wall distance. Functional status and disease-related symptoms were assessed with BASDAI, BASFI and ASQoL.

Results: There were no differences between static and dynamic pedobarographic analysis parameters between the AS group and the control group (p > 0.05). Self-rated functional levels parameters, pain, and stiffness were higher in the AS group (p < 0.05). Lumbar flexion (p = 0.187) and tragus-to-wall distance (p = 0.196) were similar in two groups. Self-rated parameters were correlated with pain, stiffness, and lateral flexion (p < 0.05). Lateral flexion correlated with FA and FFL; tragus to wall distance correlated with FPmax and CoP and RFL; lumbar flexion correlated with FA (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The results showed that there was no difference plantar pressure distribution but there was a difference in spinal mobility in AS group compared healthy individuals.

强直性脊柱炎患者与无症状健康人足底压力分布模式的比较:一项横断面研究。
背景:强直性脊柱炎(AS)是一种引起体位改变的慢性炎症性疾病。由于这些变化减少了髋关节屈曲,增加了膝关节屈曲和踝关节的足底屈曲。目的:本研究的目的是比较AS患者和健康个体的足底压力分布结果,并确定AS患者的临床和功能参数之间的关系。方法:选取25例AS患者(中位年龄= 42.2±2.1岁)和25例健康个体(中位年龄= 44.4±1.7岁)作为研究对象。通过足压分析测定各组小鼠的最大足压力(FPmax)、平均足压力、压力角中心(CoP)、前足负荷(FFL)、后足负荷(RFL)、足推进角(FPA)和足角(FA)。通过腰椎屈曲、侧屈和耳屏壁距离来评估脊柱活动度。采用BASDAI、BASFI和ASQoL评估功能状态和疾病相关症状。结果:AS组与对照组的静态、动态足检分析参数差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。AS组自评功能水平参数、疼痛和僵硬度较高(p max、CoP和RFL;结论:AS组与健康人相比,足底压力分布无差异,但脊柱活动度有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Medical Science
Irish Journal of Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Medical Science is the official organ of the Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. Established in 1832, this quarterly journal is a contribution to medical science and an ideal forum for the younger medical/scientific professional to enter world literature and an ideal launching platform now, as in the past, for many a young research worker. The primary role of both the Academy and IJMS is that of providing a forum for the exchange of scientific information and to promote academic discussion, so essential to scientific progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信