The Gendered Well-being Assessment: addressing trauma, complex needs & social determinants of health.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Denise Ruprai, Simon Pemberton, Richard Summers
{"title":"The Gendered Well-being Assessment: addressing trauma, complex needs & social determinants of health.","authors":"Denise Ruprai, Simon Pemberton, Richard Summers","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02553-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Women's Centres in the UK provide crucial support to women with complex needs, who are often excluded from statutory services, frequently acting as a service of 'last resort'. A major challenge when working with this population is the lack of a holistic, validated, and gender-responsive assessment tool to measure needs comprehensively and systematically. This paper introduces the Gendered Well-being Assessment (GWA), a trauma-informed quality-of-life assessment designed for women with complex needs outside the criminal justice system. The GWA aims to support early intervention, enhance multi-agency collaboration, whilst offering a structured framework for case management. A comprehensive scoring algorithm combines contemporary research on accumulative complex trauma, complex needs, and toxic stress physiology with an overall aim to highlight unmet needs to avoid preventable harm and improve overall quality of life. The assessment takes account of the interconnectedness of needs, and across 5 key domains, and 12 sections create a comprehensive overview of the breadth and depth of needs. Unlike fragmented assessments, the GWA integrates multiple validated tools into a single framework, ensuring credibility within multi-agency partnerships. By recognising protective factors like self-efficacy and social support, the GWA moves beyond harm mitigation to promote resilience and flourishing. Its structured, algorithm-based approach informs personalised support plans, transforming service provision and policy. This innovative tool ensures that women's needs are addressed comprehensively and equitably within a broader social context.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"224"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12355881/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02553-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Women's Centres in the UK provide crucial support to women with complex needs, who are often excluded from statutory services, frequently acting as a service of 'last resort'. A major challenge when working with this population is the lack of a holistic, validated, and gender-responsive assessment tool to measure needs comprehensively and systematically. This paper introduces the Gendered Well-being Assessment (GWA), a trauma-informed quality-of-life assessment designed for women with complex needs outside the criminal justice system. The GWA aims to support early intervention, enhance multi-agency collaboration, whilst offering a structured framework for case management. A comprehensive scoring algorithm combines contemporary research on accumulative complex trauma, complex needs, and toxic stress physiology with an overall aim to highlight unmet needs to avoid preventable harm and improve overall quality of life. The assessment takes account of the interconnectedness of needs, and across 5 key domains, and 12 sections create a comprehensive overview of the breadth and depth of needs. Unlike fragmented assessments, the GWA integrates multiple validated tools into a single framework, ensuring credibility within multi-agency partnerships. By recognising protective factors like self-efficacy and social support, the GWA moves beyond harm mitigation to promote resilience and flourishing. Its structured, algorithm-based approach informs personalised support plans, transforming service provision and policy. This innovative tool ensures that women's needs are addressed comprehensively and equitably within a broader social context.

性别福祉评估:处理创伤、复杂需求和健康的社会决定因素。
英国的妇女中心为有复杂需求的妇女提供关键支持,这些妇女经常被排除在法定服务之外,经常作为“最后手段”提供服务。在与这一人群合作时面临的一个主要挑战是缺乏一种全面、有效和顾及性别的评估工具来全面和系统地衡量需求。本文介绍了性别福利评估(GWA),这是一种创伤知情的生活质量评估,专为刑事司法系统外具有复杂需求的妇女设计。GWA旨在支持早期干预,加强多机构合作,同时为病例管理提供结构化框架。综合评分算法结合了当前对累积性复杂创伤、复杂需求和毒性应激生理学的研究,总体目的是突出未满足的需求,以避免可预防的伤害,提高整体生活质量。该评估考虑到需求的相互关联性,跨越5个关键领域,并通过12个部分对需求的广度和深度进行了全面概述。与分散的评估不同,GWA将多个经过验证的工具集成到一个框架中,确保了多机构伙伴关系中的可信度。通过认识到自我效能和社会支持等保护因素,GWA超越了减轻伤害,促进了复原力和繁荣。其结构化、基于算法的方法为个性化支持计划提供信息,改变服务提供和政策。这一创新工具确保妇女的需求在更广泛的社会背景下得到全面和公平的解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信