{"title":"Sirolimus-Coated Balloon Versus Drug-Eluting Stent in Elderly Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Matched-based Comparison","authors":"Filippo Luca Gurgoglione MD , Sylwia Iwańczyk MD , Wojciech Wańha MD , Davide Donelli MD , Dario Gattuso Eng , Giampaolo Niccoli MD, PhD , Bernardo Cortese MD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.08.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of mortality in elderly patients (≥75 years). While percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) is commonly used in elderly patients with CAD, drug-coated balloons (DCB) have emerged as a promising alternative. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of PCI with Sirolimus-Coated Balloons (SCB) and second-generation DES in this population. We included elderly patients who underwent PCI from the prospective, investigator-driven EASTBOURNE study (n= 534 patients treated with Magic Touch SCB) and the Complex Registry (n = 234 patients treated with second-generation DES). The primary endpoint was net adverse cardiovascular events (NACE), a composite of all-cause death, target lesion revascularization (TLR), nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and major bleedings at the 2-year follow-up. The cardinality score matching and Cox regression analysis were employed. After matching, 220 patients were included in each group. The incidence of NACE was similar between groups (HR 1.28; 95% CI: 0.85–1.93; p = 0.239). No significant differences were observed in the rates of nonfatal MI, or TLR. However, the SCB group exhibited a significantly lower rate of the secondary BARC 3–5 bleeding endpoint compared to the DES group (HR 0.17; 95% CI: 0.04–0.77; p = 0.030). In conclusion, CI with SCB demonstrated comparable safety and efficacy to second-generation DES in elderly patients with CAD at 2-year follow-up, with a notable reduction in major bleeding risk in the SCB group.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":"255 ","pages":"Pages 99-105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914925004643","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of mortality in elderly patients (≥75 years). While percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) is commonly used in elderly patients with CAD, drug-coated balloons (DCB) have emerged as a promising alternative. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of PCI with Sirolimus-Coated Balloons (SCB) and second-generation DES in this population. We included elderly patients who underwent PCI from the prospective, investigator-driven EASTBOURNE study (n= 534 patients treated with Magic Touch SCB) and the Complex Registry (n = 234 patients treated with second-generation DES). The primary endpoint was net adverse cardiovascular events (NACE), a composite of all-cause death, target lesion revascularization (TLR), nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and major bleedings at the 2-year follow-up. The cardinality score matching and Cox regression analysis were employed. After matching, 220 patients were included in each group. The incidence of NACE was similar between groups (HR 1.28; 95% CI: 0.85–1.93; p = 0.239). No significant differences were observed in the rates of nonfatal MI, or TLR. However, the SCB group exhibited a significantly lower rate of the secondary BARC 3–5 bleeding endpoint compared to the DES group (HR 0.17; 95% CI: 0.04–0.77; p = 0.030). In conclusion, CI with SCB demonstrated comparable safety and efficacy to second-generation DES in elderly patients with CAD at 2-year follow-up, with a notable reduction in major bleeding risk in the SCB group.
期刊介绍:
Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.