Spatial Disparities in Drawing the Operational Programme Quality of Environment With the Focus on Flood-Related Projects in Slovakia

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Katarína Vilinová, Matej Vojtek, Gabriela Repaská, Jana Vojteková
{"title":"Spatial Disparities in Drawing the Operational Programme Quality of Environment With the Focus on Flood-Related Projects in Slovakia","authors":"Katarína Vilinová,&nbsp;Matej Vojtek,&nbsp;Gabriela Repaská,&nbsp;Jana Vojteková","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The primary focus of the Operational Programme Quality of Environment (OP QE) is the support of EU regions in terms of environmental protection, efficient use of natural resources, flood protection and adaptation to climate change, as well as support of a low-carbon economy. The aim of this article is a spatial analysis of the distribution of financial resources from the OP QE (priority axes 2 and 3) in 2017–2022 at different spatial-hierarchical levels (region, district, and municipality) of Slovakia. The results indicated that there were significant differences in the number of submitted as well as approved/declined projects among individual regions, districts, or municipalities. Regarding the district level, several districts did not submit any project during the studied period, despite the existing flood risk. At the municipal level, out of total municipalities that received funding, approximately half were marked as potentially significantly endangered and approximately another half were marked as not endangered by the Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment—PFRA (2018). Based on this, inclusion of municipalities in different flood risk categories defined by the PFRA (2018) is not being taken into account when approving/declining projects and the same applies to the occurrence of previous flood events in municipalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70113","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70113","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary focus of the Operational Programme Quality of Environment (OP QE) is the support of EU regions in terms of environmental protection, efficient use of natural resources, flood protection and adaptation to climate change, as well as support of a low-carbon economy. The aim of this article is a spatial analysis of the distribution of financial resources from the OP QE (priority axes 2 and 3) in 2017–2022 at different spatial-hierarchical levels (region, district, and municipality) of Slovakia. The results indicated that there were significant differences in the number of submitted as well as approved/declined projects among individual regions, districts, or municipalities. Regarding the district level, several districts did not submit any project during the studied period, despite the existing flood risk. At the municipal level, out of total municipalities that received funding, approximately half were marked as potentially significantly endangered and approximately another half were marked as not endangered by the Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment—PFRA (2018). Based on this, inclusion of municipalities in different flood risk categories defined by the PFRA (2018) is not being taken into account when approving/declining projects and the same applies to the occurrence of previous flood events in municipalities.

Abstract Image

制定环境质量业务方案的空间差异,重点是斯洛伐克与洪水有关的项目
环境质量业务计划(OP QE)的主要重点是在环境保护、自然资源的有效利用、洪水保护和适应气候变化以及支持低碳经济方面支持欧盟地区。本文的目的是对2017-2022年斯洛伐克不同空间层次(地区、区和市)的OP QE(优先轴2和3)的财政资源分布进行空间分析。结果表明,在个别地区、区或市之间,提交的项目数量以及批准/拒绝的项目数量存在显著差异。在地区层面,尽管存在洪水风险,但有几个地区在研究期间没有提交任何项目。在市一级,在获得资金的所有城市中,大约一半被初步洪水风险评估- pfra(2018)标记为潜在严重濒危,大约另一半被标记为非濒危。基于此,在批准/拒绝项目时,不考虑将城市纳入PFRA(2018)定义的不同洪水风险类别,这同样适用于城市以前发生的洪水事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Journal of Flood Risk Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind. Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信