Patricia Martínez-Garzón, Men-Andrin Meier, Cristiano Collettini, Federica Lanza, Georg Dresen
{"title":"Stress Heterogeneities Governed by Fault Structure and Stress Transfer: The 2016–2017 Central Italy Seismic Sequence","authors":"Patricia Martínez-Garzón, Men-Andrin Meier, Cristiano Collettini, Federica Lanza, Georg Dresen","doi":"10.1029/2024JB029763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We analyze the evolution of stress parameters from the 2016–2017 central Italy seismic sequence taking advantage of ∼13,747 robust focal mechanisms from a deep learning catalog. The density of the catalog allows us to invert focal mechanisms over distances of a few km and different time periods. We inferred a number of stress-related parameters, including the fault plane variability, the orientation of principal stress axes and maximum horizontal stress, the relative magnitudes of principal stresses and the variability of the principal stress orientations with respect to the median. From the uniform regional stress field consistent with the extension of the Apennine Belt, we observe local stress heterogeneities that are driven by the structural features and the coseismic stress history. A variation of the principal stress magnitudes and regimes from pure normal faulting toward transtension with depth is observed. Stress differences at the 1–10 km wavelength are observed between each side of two of the main regional fault structures. The reported stress results suggest a partial mechanical coupling and a strong interaction between the shallow normal faults and the detachment horizon at depth. Furthermore, distinct trends are observed in the stress parameters after the largest mainshocks, and before the <i>M</i><sub>W</sub> 6.5 Norcia mainshock, potentially indicating the high shear stress still available in well oriented faults after the <i>M</i><sub>W</sub> 6.0 Amatrice earthquake. Our analysis holds implications toward (a) constraining stress magnitudes, (b) illuminating the interaction between the shallow normal faults and detachment horizons, and (c) tracking stress evolution during seismic sequence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","volume":"130 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JB029763","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JB029763","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We analyze the evolution of stress parameters from the 2016–2017 central Italy seismic sequence taking advantage of ∼13,747 robust focal mechanisms from a deep learning catalog. The density of the catalog allows us to invert focal mechanisms over distances of a few km and different time periods. We inferred a number of stress-related parameters, including the fault plane variability, the orientation of principal stress axes and maximum horizontal stress, the relative magnitudes of principal stresses and the variability of the principal stress orientations with respect to the median. From the uniform regional stress field consistent with the extension of the Apennine Belt, we observe local stress heterogeneities that are driven by the structural features and the coseismic stress history. A variation of the principal stress magnitudes and regimes from pure normal faulting toward transtension with depth is observed. Stress differences at the 1–10 km wavelength are observed between each side of two of the main regional fault structures. The reported stress results suggest a partial mechanical coupling and a strong interaction between the shallow normal faults and the detachment horizon at depth. Furthermore, distinct trends are observed in the stress parameters after the largest mainshocks, and before the MW 6.5 Norcia mainshock, potentially indicating the high shear stress still available in well oriented faults after the MW 6.0 Amatrice earthquake. Our analysis holds implications toward (a) constraining stress magnitudes, (b) illuminating the interaction between the shallow normal faults and detachment horizons, and (c) tracking stress evolution during seismic sequence.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth serves as the premier publication for the breadth of solid Earth geophysics including (in alphabetical order): electromagnetic methods; exploration geophysics; geodesy and gravity; geodynamics, rheology, and plate kinematics; geomagnetism and paleomagnetism; hydrogeophysics; Instruments, techniques, and models; solid Earth interactions with the cryosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and climate; marine geology and geophysics; natural and anthropogenic hazards; near surface geophysics; petrology, geochemistry, and mineralogy; planet Earth physics and chemistry; rock mechanics and deformation; seismology; tectonophysics; and volcanology.
JGR: Solid Earth has long distinguished itself as the venue for publication of Research Articles backed solidly by data and as well as presenting theoretical and numerical developments with broad applications. Research Articles published in JGR: Solid Earth have had long-term impacts in their fields.
JGR: Solid Earth provides a venue for special issues and special themes based on conferences, workshops, and community initiatives. JGR: Solid Earth also publishes Commentaries on research and emerging trends in the field; these are commissioned by the editors, and suggestion are welcome.