Multi-scenario impacts on ecosystem services and relationships in alpine ecosystems: A case study of the Daxing’anling forest area, Inner Mongolia

IF 2.9 Q1 FORESTRY
Laixian Xu , Youjun He , Liang Zhang , Hui Xu , Chunwei Tang
{"title":"Multi-scenario impacts on ecosystem services and relationships in alpine ecosystems: A case study of the Daxing’anling forest area, Inner Mongolia","authors":"Laixian Xu ,&nbsp;Youjun He ,&nbsp;Liang Zhang ,&nbsp;Hui Xu ,&nbsp;Chunwei Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding future ecosystem service (ES) dynamics and relationships is crucial for sustainable management, particularly in degraded alpine ecosystems. Research gaps exist in integrating future land use with SSP-RCP climate scenarios to systematically examine ESs and their multidimensional relationships. Focusing on the Daxing’anling forest area, Inner Mongolia, we developed a comprehensive framework integrating PLUS and InVEST models with SSP-RCP scenarios to simulate spatiotemporal dynamics of four ESs and their multi-perspective relationships under nine climate and land-use scenarios from 2018 to 2053. Main findings: (1) Climate was characterized by warming and drying, with forests remaining dominant (&gt;93 %). Ecological protection (EP) scenarios promoted forest expansion, whereas conventional development (CD) and ecological-economic development (EED) scenarios expanded cropland. (2) By 2053, water yield (WY) decreased significantly (3.45–10.52 %), while carbon storage (CS), soil conservation, and habitat quality (HQ) experienced minor fluctuations. ES supply capacity was highest under EP scenarios and lowest under CD scenarios. (3) All ES pairs exhibited predominantly synergistic relationships, with strongest synergy in CS-HQ and weakest in WY-CS. SSP126 most favorably influenced ES pair relationships. (4) Overall relationships among multiple ESs were dominated by trade-offs (81.44–82.17 %). EP scenarios enhanced trade-offs while suppressing synergies, whereas CD and EED scenarios produced opposite effects. Overall, climate and land-use changes impact ESs and their relationships scenario-dependently and spatially heterogeneously, with SSP126-EP being optimal. Under most scenarios, ES supply capacity weakened, ES pairs remained synergistic, and overall ES relationships were dominated by strengthened trade-offs. We recommend adaptive climate management, land-use optimization, and differentiated strategies for alpine ecosystem sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100975"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719325002018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding future ecosystem service (ES) dynamics and relationships is crucial for sustainable management, particularly in degraded alpine ecosystems. Research gaps exist in integrating future land use with SSP-RCP climate scenarios to systematically examine ESs and their multidimensional relationships. Focusing on the Daxing’anling forest area, Inner Mongolia, we developed a comprehensive framework integrating PLUS and InVEST models with SSP-RCP scenarios to simulate spatiotemporal dynamics of four ESs and their multi-perspective relationships under nine climate and land-use scenarios from 2018 to 2053. Main findings: (1) Climate was characterized by warming and drying, with forests remaining dominant (>93 %). Ecological protection (EP) scenarios promoted forest expansion, whereas conventional development (CD) and ecological-economic development (EED) scenarios expanded cropland. (2) By 2053, water yield (WY) decreased significantly (3.45–10.52 %), while carbon storage (CS), soil conservation, and habitat quality (HQ) experienced minor fluctuations. ES supply capacity was highest under EP scenarios and lowest under CD scenarios. (3) All ES pairs exhibited predominantly synergistic relationships, with strongest synergy in CS-HQ and weakest in WY-CS. SSP126 most favorably influenced ES pair relationships. (4) Overall relationships among multiple ESs were dominated by trade-offs (81.44–82.17 %). EP scenarios enhanced trade-offs while suppressing synergies, whereas CD and EED scenarios produced opposite effects. Overall, climate and land-use changes impact ESs and their relationships scenario-dependently and spatially heterogeneously, with SSP126-EP being optimal. Under most scenarios, ES supply capacity weakened, ES pairs remained synergistic, and overall ES relationships were dominated by strengthened trade-offs. We recommend adaptive climate management, land-use optimization, and differentiated strategies for alpine ecosystem sustainability.
高寒生态系统服务功能与关系的多情景影响——以内蒙古大兴安岭林区为例
了解未来生态系统服务(ES)的动态和关系对于可持续管理至关重要,特别是在退化的高山生态系统中。在将未来土地利用与SSP-RCP气候情景相结合,系统考察ESs及其多维关系方面存在研究空白。以内蒙古大兴安岭林区为研究对象,建立了基于PLUS和InVEST模型和SSP-RCP情景的综合框架,模拟了2018 - 2053年9种气候和土地利用情景下4种生态环境的时空动态及其多视角关系。主要发现:(1)气候以暖干为主,以森林为主(93%);生态保护(EP)情景促进了森林扩张,而传统发展(CD)和生态经济发展(EED)情景扩大了耕地。(2)到2053年,降水量(WY)显著下降(3.45 ~ 10.52%),碳储量(CS)、土壤保持和生境质量(HQ)波动较小。EP情景下ES的供应能力最高,CD情景下最低。(3)所有ES对均表现出显著的协同关系,其中CS-HQ的协同作用最强,WY-CS的协同作用最弱。SSP126对ES对关系影响最大。(4)多个ESs之间的整体关系以权衡为主(81.44 ~ 82.17%)。EP方案增强了权衡,同时抑制了协同效应,而CD和EED方案则产生了相反的效果。总体而言,气候和土地利用变化对生态系统及其关系的影响具有场景依赖性和空间异质性,以SSP126-EP为最优。在大多数情景下,ES供应能力减弱,ES对保持协同,整体ES关系以强化的权衡为主导。本文提出了适应性气候管理、土地利用优化和高寒生态系统可持续性差别化策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信