Epistemic lexical verbs in academic writing: A corpus-based comparative study of L1 English and L1 Chinese writers of English

IF 2.1
Fei Xie, Amanda Patten
{"title":"Epistemic lexical verbs in academic writing: A corpus-based comparative study of L1 English and L1 Chinese writers of English","authors":"Fei Xie,&nbsp;Amanda Patten","doi":"10.1016/j.acorp.2025.100144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Epistemic lexical verbs (ELVs) are critical to English academic writing where writers need to deliver their statements with an appropriate level of modesty and certainty. Drawing on Hyland’s (1998) taxonomy of ELVs, the study combines both quantitative and qualitative methods to examine how L1 Chinese writers use ELVs to express modality differently from L1 English writers in terms of frequency, range, sentence and grammatical construction. The investigation was conducted on two specialised corpora, comprising academic texts written by postgraduate students of L1 Chinese and L1 English respectively. The findings indicate that L1 Chinese writers tend to rely on a different range of devices and express a stronger commitment. Moreover, L1 Chinese students’ usage of ELVs is less balanced in terms of the grammatical patterns and sentence constructions, and some misuses can be identified in their writing. The authors also highlight the potential reasons behind these findings and propose pedagogical suggestions to improve learners’ pragmatic competence in this important area.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72254,"journal":{"name":"Applied Corpus Linguistics","volume":"5 3","pages":"Article 100144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Corpus Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666799125000279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Epistemic lexical verbs (ELVs) are critical to English academic writing where writers need to deliver their statements with an appropriate level of modesty and certainty. Drawing on Hyland’s (1998) taxonomy of ELVs, the study combines both quantitative and qualitative methods to examine how L1 Chinese writers use ELVs to express modality differently from L1 English writers in terms of frequency, range, sentence and grammatical construction. The investigation was conducted on two specialised corpora, comprising academic texts written by postgraduate students of L1 Chinese and L1 English respectively. The findings indicate that L1 Chinese writers tend to rely on a different range of devices and express a stronger commitment. Moreover, L1 Chinese students’ usage of ELVs is less balanced in terms of the grammatical patterns and sentence constructions, and some misuses can be identified in their writing. The authors also highlight the potential reasons behind these findings and propose pedagogical suggestions to improve learners’ pragmatic competence in this important area.
学术写作中的认知词汇动词:基于语料库的母语英语和母语汉语英语作者比较研究
认识论词汇动词(elv)对英语学术写作至关重要,因为作者需要以适当的谦虚和确定性来表达他们的陈述。本研究借鉴Hyland(1998)的语气词分类法,采用定量和定性相结合的方法,考察汉语母语作者使用语气词表达情态在频率、范围、句子和语法结构等方面与英语母语作者的差异。调查是在两个专门的语料库上进行的,其中包括分别由L1汉语和L1英语的研究生撰写的学术文本。研究结果表明,母语汉语作者倾向于使用不同的语言表达手段,表达更强的承诺。此外,汉语母语学生在语法模式和句子结构方面的使用不平衡,在写作中可以发现一些误用现象。作者还强调了这些发现背后的潜在原因,并提出了提高学习者在这一重要领域的语用能力的教学建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Corpus Linguistics
Applied Corpus Linguistics Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
70 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信