Jennifer L. Reed R. Kin, PhD , Heather E. Tulloch PhD , Heather Ross MD , Tasuku Terada PhD , Matheus Mistura MSc , Isabela Roque Marçal MSc , Paul Oh MD , Sharon Chih MBBS, PhD
{"title":"Cardiovascular Prehabilitation in Patients Awaiting Heart Transplantation— Addressing Clinical Needs (the PREHAB HTx Study)","authors":"Jennifer L. Reed R. Kin, PhD , Heather E. Tulloch PhD , Heather Ross MD , Tasuku Terada PhD , Matheus Mistura MSc , Isabela Roque Marçal MSc , Paul Oh MD , Sharon Chih MBBS, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cjco.2025.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To compare the effects of a 12-week prehabilitation (PREHAB) program vs usual care (UC) on functional capacity in adults listed for heart transplantation. Secondary aims included comparing peak oxygen uptake (<span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span>O<sub>2</sub>peak), frailty, physical activity, mental health, cognitive function, quality of life (QoL), and dietary habits.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multicentre randomized controlled trial was conducted. Participants were randomized to PREHAB or UC. The 12-week PREHAB program included twice weekly high-intensity interval training sessions on an upright cycle ergometer, a stress management course, and a nutrition workshop. The primary outcome was functional capacity (6-minute walk test distance) from baseline to 12 weeks of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included changes in <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span>O<sub>2</sub>peak, frailty, physical activity, severity of anxiety, depression, and stress, cognitive function, QoL, and dietary habits.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Trial recruitment began in October 2018 and closed, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, in October 2020. Of 84 patients screened, 17 were recruited (age: 44 ± 9 years, 71% male), and 4 were randomized (PREHAB = 2; UC = 2). Both patients completed PREHAB, and 1 patient completed UC. Reasons for dropout throughout the trial included the following: receiving a transplant; medication and device contraindications; commitment and travel constraints; and lack of interest. PREHAB showed potential for improvements in the 6-minute walk test distance (Baseline [B]: 343 ± 120; follow-up [FU]: 465 m), <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span>O<sub>2</sub>peak (B: 14.9 ± 0.1; FU: 15.8 ± 0.4 mL/kg/min), and QoL measured using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (B: 41 ± 33; FU: 26 ± 1 points).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Recruitment for and completion of PREHAB for patients listed for heart transplantation proved challenging. Given wait-time limitations, future research should examine alternative PREHAB programming, offered sooner following listing, that addresses reported barriers to participation.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Trial Registration</h3><div><span><span>NCT02957955</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36924,"journal":{"name":"CJC Open","volume":"7 8","pages":"Pages 1110-1119"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJC Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589790X25003841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
To compare the effects of a 12-week prehabilitation (PREHAB) program vs usual care (UC) on functional capacity in adults listed for heart transplantation. Secondary aims included comparing peak oxygen uptake (O2peak), frailty, physical activity, mental health, cognitive function, quality of life (QoL), and dietary habits.
Methods
A multicentre randomized controlled trial was conducted. Participants were randomized to PREHAB or UC. The 12-week PREHAB program included twice weekly high-intensity interval training sessions on an upright cycle ergometer, a stress management course, and a nutrition workshop. The primary outcome was functional capacity (6-minute walk test distance) from baseline to 12 weeks of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included changes in O2peak, frailty, physical activity, severity of anxiety, depression, and stress, cognitive function, QoL, and dietary habits.
Results
Trial recruitment began in October 2018 and closed, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, in October 2020. Of 84 patients screened, 17 were recruited (age: 44 ± 9 years, 71% male), and 4 were randomized (PREHAB = 2; UC = 2). Both patients completed PREHAB, and 1 patient completed UC. Reasons for dropout throughout the trial included the following: receiving a transplant; medication and device contraindications; commitment and travel constraints; and lack of interest. PREHAB showed potential for improvements in the 6-minute walk test distance (Baseline [B]: 343 ± 120; follow-up [FU]: 465 m), O2peak (B: 14.9 ± 0.1; FU: 15.8 ± 0.4 mL/kg/min), and QoL measured using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (B: 41 ± 33; FU: 26 ± 1 points).
Conclusions
Recruitment for and completion of PREHAB for patients listed for heart transplantation proved challenging. Given wait-time limitations, future research should examine alternative PREHAB programming, offered sooner following listing, that addresses reported barriers to participation.