Using Implementation Science to Evaluate the Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in a Clinical Heart Failure Care Setting

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Sarah V.C. Lawrason MSc, PhD , Heather Ross MSc, MD , Michael McDonald MD , Juan Duero Posada MD , Samantha Engbers BAH , Anne Simard MHSc
{"title":"Using Implementation Science to Evaluate the Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in a Clinical Heart Failure Care Setting","authors":"Sarah V.C. Lawrason MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;Heather Ross MSc, MD ,&nbsp;Michael McDonald MD ,&nbsp;Juan Duero Posada MD ,&nbsp;Samantha Engbers BAH ,&nbsp;Anne Simard MHSc","doi":"10.1016/j.cjco.2025.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with heart failure (HF) can experience poor quality of life, recurring hospitalizations, and progressive disease symptoms. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) include patients’ voices in clinical care by assessing patient symptoms, function, and quality of life. In 2022, PROMs were implemented into the electronic health record system (Epic) at a large academic hospital in Toronto, Canada. The purpose of this study was to use implementation science frameworks to systematically evaluate the uptake and integration of PROMs into clinical HF care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework guided this mixed-methods, 1-year quality-improvement project. Data sources included clinician use of PROMs, patient-level data on completed PROMs, and semistructured interviews with clinicians. The PROM was the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12, which captures 4 domains related to HF: symptom frequency, physical limitations, social limitations, and quality of life. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data were analyzed using behaviour-change frameworks and latent content analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Over the course of 1 year, more patients were assigned to PROMs, a higher proportion of patients completed PROMs, and approximately 60% of patients had high questionnaire scores. Clinicians experience barriers related to attention and decision processes, environmental context, and their professional role, in integrating PROMs into practice. Suggested resources include adding language licenses for PROM translations, reducing cognitive load for clinicians assigning and interpreting PROMs in Epic, and champions modelling PROMs in practice.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study demonstrates the benefit of using implementation science frameworks to evaluate the implementation of PROMs in practice and provide actionable recommendations to health systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36924,"journal":{"name":"CJC Open","volume":"7 8","pages":"Pages 1017-1026"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJC Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589790X2500407X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patients with heart failure (HF) can experience poor quality of life, recurring hospitalizations, and progressive disease symptoms. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) include patients’ voices in clinical care by assessing patient symptoms, function, and quality of life. In 2022, PROMs were implemented into the electronic health record system (Epic) at a large academic hospital in Toronto, Canada. The purpose of this study was to use implementation science frameworks to systematically evaluate the uptake and integration of PROMs into clinical HF care.

Methods

The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework guided this mixed-methods, 1-year quality-improvement project. Data sources included clinician use of PROMs, patient-level data on completed PROMs, and semistructured interviews with clinicians. The PROM was the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12, which captures 4 domains related to HF: symptom frequency, physical limitations, social limitations, and quality of life. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data were analyzed using behaviour-change frameworks and latent content analysis.

Results

Over the course of 1 year, more patients were assigned to PROMs, a higher proportion of patients completed PROMs, and approximately 60% of patients had high questionnaire scores. Clinicians experience barriers related to attention and decision processes, environmental context, and their professional role, in integrating PROMs into practice. Suggested resources include adding language licenses for PROM translations, reducing cognitive load for clinicians assigning and interpreting PROMs in Epic, and champions modelling PROMs in practice.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the benefit of using implementation science frameworks to evaluate the implementation of PROMs in practice and provide actionable recommendations to health systems.
应用实施科学评估临床心力衰竭护理环境中患者报告结果措施(PROMs)的实施情况
心衰(HF)患者可经历生活质量差、反复住院和疾病症状进行性发展。患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)包括患者在临床护理中的声音,通过评估患者的症状、功能和生活质量。2022年,prom在加拿大多伦多一家大型学术医院的电子健康记录系统(Epic)中实施。本研究的目的是使用实施科学框架系统地评估PROMs在临床心衰护理中的吸收和整合。方法采用可及性、有效性、采用、实施和维护(RE-AIM)框架指导这个为期一年的混合方法质量改进项目。数据来源包括临床医生对PROMs的使用,完成PROMs的患者水平数据,以及与临床医生的半结构化访谈。PROM是堪萨斯城心肌病问卷-12,它捕获了与HF相关的4个领域:症状频率、身体限制、社会限制和生活质量。定量数据使用描述性统计进行分析,定性数据使用行为变化框架和潜在内容分析进行分析。结果在1年的时间里,更多的患者被分配到PROMs,完成PROMs的患者比例更高,约60%的患者问卷得分较高。临床医生在将PROMs整合到实践中,会遇到与注意力和决策过程、环境背景以及他们的专业角色相关的障碍。建议的资源包括增加PROM翻译的语言许可,减少临床医生在Epic中分配和解释PROM的认知负荷,以及在实践中支持PROM建模。结论:本研究证明了使用实施科学框架来评估PROMs在实践中的实施并为卫生系统提供可操作的建议的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CJC Open
CJC Open Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信