Use of modern family planning methods and its association with quality of life among Rwandan women: a multi-center cross-sectional study.

IF 1.9 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Uwineza Mireille Aimee, Diomède Ntasumbumuyange, Polyphile Ntihinyurwa, Izere Salomon, Aurore Nishimwe, Stephen Rulisa
{"title":"Use of modern family planning methods and its association with quality of life among Rwandan women: a multi-center cross-sectional study.","authors":"Uwineza Mireille Aimee, Diomède Ntasumbumuyange, Polyphile Ntihinyurwa, Izere Salomon, Aurore Nishimwe, Stephen Rulisa","doi":"10.1186/s40834-025-00374-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family planning (FP) promotes sustainable population growth and enhances societal well-being. Despite its recognized importance, the quality of life (QoL) of women utilizing modern FP methods in Rwanda remains underexplored. Women's experiences and perceptions of contraceptive methods significantly influence their uptake and continued use.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the QoL of women using modern FP methods in Rwanda.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted involving 415 women who had been using modern FP methods for at least six months. Participants were recruited from the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali (CHUK) and four selected Health Centers in Rwanda. The Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey was used to evaluate the QoL. Data analysis was performed using the R programming version 4.0.2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported overall favorable QoL across all domains. Social functioning scored the highest (94.16%, SD = 17), while physical functioning scored the lowest (80.6%, SD = 34.45). Women aged 32-38 had significantly higher QoL scores in role functioning, including social functioning, role functioning due to physical issues, and role functioning due to emotional issues (p < 0.001, p = 0.014, and p = 0.034, respectively). The type of FP Method was strongly associated with QoL outcomes in all domains, with Intrauterine Devices (IUDs) correlating with the highest scores, particularly in physical functioning (p < 0.001). Rural women reported better general health (p < 0.001) compared to their urban counterparts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women using modern FP methods in Rwanda generally reported a high QoL. Both the FP method type and age significantly influenced QoL outcomes. Thus, there is a need to promote the universal use of Modern FP methods among women of reproductive age in Rwanda.</p>","PeriodicalId":93956,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12355850/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-025-00374-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Family planning (FP) promotes sustainable population growth and enhances societal well-being. Despite its recognized importance, the quality of life (QoL) of women utilizing modern FP methods in Rwanda remains underexplored. Women's experiences and perceptions of contraceptive methods significantly influence their uptake and continued use.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the QoL of women using modern FP methods in Rwanda.

Methodology: A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted involving 415 women who had been using modern FP methods for at least six months. Participants were recruited from the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali (CHUK) and four selected Health Centers in Rwanda. The Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey was used to evaluate the QoL. Data analysis was performed using the R programming version 4.0.2.

Results: Participants reported overall favorable QoL across all domains. Social functioning scored the highest (94.16%, SD = 17), while physical functioning scored the lowest (80.6%, SD = 34.45). Women aged 32-38 had significantly higher QoL scores in role functioning, including social functioning, role functioning due to physical issues, and role functioning due to emotional issues (p < 0.001, p = 0.014, and p = 0.034, respectively). The type of FP Method was strongly associated with QoL outcomes in all domains, with Intrauterine Devices (IUDs) correlating with the highest scores, particularly in physical functioning (p < 0.001). Rural women reported better general health (p < 0.001) compared to their urban counterparts.

Conclusion: Women using modern FP methods in Rwanda generally reported a high QoL. Both the FP method type and age significantly influenced QoL outcomes. Thus, there is a need to promote the universal use of Modern FP methods among women of reproductive age in Rwanda.

卢旺达妇女使用现代计划生育方法及其与生活质量的关系:一项多中心横断面研究。
背景:计划生育促进人口可持续增长,提高社会福祉。尽管其重要性得到公认,但卢旺达妇女使用现代计划生育方法的生活质量(QoL)仍未得到充分探索。妇女对避孕方法的经验和看法对避孕方法的接受和继续使用有重大影响。目的:本研究旨在评估卢旺达妇女使用现代计划生育方法的生活质量。方法:一项涉及415名使用现代计划生育方法至少6个月的妇女的多中心横断面研究。参与者是从基加利大学教学医院和卢旺达选定的四个保健中心招募的。采用SF-36健康问卷对生活质量进行评价。数据分析使用R编程版本4.0.2进行。结果:参与者报告了所有领域的总体良好的生活质量。社会功能得分最高(94.16%,SD = 17),身体功能得分最低(80.6%,SD = 34.45)。32-38岁的女性在角色功能方面的生活质量得分明显更高,包括社会功能、身体问题导致的角色功能和情感问题导致的角色功能(p结论:卢旺达使用现代计划生育方法的女性普遍报告的生活质量较高。FP方法类型和年龄对患者的生活质量均有显著影响。因此,有必要促进卢旺达育龄妇女普遍使用现代计划生育方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信