Explainable machine learning for the prognostication of salivary duct carcinoma: Development and deployment of a web-based prediction tool.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Junxu Chen, Derong Zou, Dongwook Kim, Hyung Jun Kim
{"title":"Explainable machine learning for the prognostication of salivary duct carcinoma: Development and deployment of a web-based prediction tool.","authors":"Junxu Chen, Derong Zou, Dongwook Kim, Hyung Jun Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is a rare but aggressive malignancy often associated with lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis. Therefore, although accurate prognostication is crucial, traditional models are often inadequate because of linear assumptions and limited interpretability. In contrast, machine learning (ML) offers a flexible, interpretable framework for improving survival prediction and supporting individualized care planning.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Overall, 552 patients with SDC (2004-2021) were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and stratified by cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) status, before being split into the training and testing sets (7:3). Three prognostic models were developed: Cox proportional hazards, random survival forest (RSF), and DeepSurv. Model performance was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), integrated Brier score, time-dependent area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values were applied to enhance model interpretability and quantify the contribution of individual features to risk prediction.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>All three models demonstrated favorable predictive performance, with the RSF model showing the best discrimination and calibration (C-index: 0.785 in training and 0.768 in testing). For CSS prediction, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year AUCs in the testing set were 0.781, 0.810, and 0.818, respectively. SHAP analysis identified positive lymph node ratio, TNM stage, and excision surgery as key prognostic predictors. The RSF model was selected for deployment as an interactive web-based tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study established an interpretable ML-based model that reliably predicts CSS and OS in patients with SDC. Its successful deployment as a web-based tool underscores its potential to enhance personalized prognostic assessment and support evidence-based clinical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102528"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102528","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is a rare but aggressive malignancy often associated with lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis. Therefore, although accurate prognostication is crucial, traditional models are often inadequate because of linear assumptions and limited interpretability. In contrast, machine learning (ML) offers a flexible, interpretable framework for improving survival prediction and supporting individualized care planning.

Method: Overall, 552 patients with SDC (2004-2021) were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and stratified by cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) status, before being split into the training and testing sets (7:3). Three prognostic models were developed: Cox proportional hazards, random survival forest (RSF), and DeepSurv. Model performance was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), integrated Brier score, time-dependent area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values were applied to enhance model interpretability and quantify the contribution of individual features to risk prediction.

Result: All three models demonstrated favorable predictive performance, with the RSF model showing the best discrimination and calibration (C-index: 0.785 in training and 0.768 in testing). For CSS prediction, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year AUCs in the testing set were 0.781, 0.810, and 0.818, respectively. SHAP analysis identified positive lymph node ratio, TNM stage, and excision surgery as key prognostic predictors. The RSF model was selected for deployment as an interactive web-based tool.

Conclusion: This study established an interpretable ML-based model that reliably predicts CSS and OS in patients with SDC. Its successful deployment as a web-based tool underscores its potential to enhance personalized prognostic assessment and support evidence-based clinical management.

可解释的机器学习用于预测唾液管癌:基于网络的预测工具的开发和部署。
背景:涎腺导管癌(SDC)是一种罕见但侵袭性的恶性肿瘤,常伴有淋巴结转移和预后差。因此,尽管准确的预测是至关重要的,但由于线性假设和有限的可解释性,传统模型往往是不充分的。相比之下,机器学习(ML)为改善生存预测和支持个性化护理计划提供了灵活、可解释的框架。方法:总体而言,从监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中确定552例SDC患者(2004-2021),并根据癌症特异性生存(CSS)和总生存(OS)状态进行分层,然后分成训练组和测试组(7:3)。建立了三种预后模型:Cox比例风险、随机生存森林(RSF)和DeepSurv。采用一致性指数(C-index)、综合Brier评分、随时间变化的曲线下面积(AUC)、校准曲线和决策曲线分析来评价模型的性能。Shapley加性解释(SHAP)值用于提高模型的可解释性和量化个体特征对风险预测的贡献。结果:3个模型均表现出较好的预测性能,其中RSF模型的判别和校准效果最好(训练c指数为0.785,测试c指数为0.768)。对于CSS预测,测试集的1年、3年和5年auc分别为0.781、0.810和0.818。SHAP分析确定阳性淋巴结比例、TNM分期和切除手术是关键的预后预测因素。选择RSF模型作为基于web的交互式工具进行部署。结论:本研究建立了一个可解释的基于ml的模型,可靠地预测SDC患者的CSS和OS。它作为一种基于网络的工具的成功部署,突显了它在加强个性化预后评估和支持循证临床管理方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
305
期刊介绍: J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics. Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses. All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must: Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise; Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research; Be solely the work of the author(s) stated; Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal; Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed. Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision. The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信