Medical student perceptions of establishing effective clinical communication: a qualitative study.

IF 3.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kathryn Veazey, Andrew Notebaert, Ellen M Robertson
{"title":"Medical student perceptions of establishing effective clinical communication: a qualitative study.","authors":"Kathryn Veazey, Andrew Notebaert, Ellen M Robertson","doi":"10.1007/s10459-025-10468-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High-quality delivery of healthcare requires effective communication between patients and providers. Clinical communication has been a priority in medical education for decades, yet studies continue to show that trainees and providers struggle to communicate effectively in real and simulated clinical scenarios. Many have investigated potential methods to improve the initial acquisition, long-term retention, and holistic evaluation of clinical communication competency in medical trainees. However, there has been a lack of rigorous qualitative research investigating the medical student perspective on this process. This study aimed to identify medical student perceptions of what factors may influence effective clinical communication and how those factors evolve with time. Twenty-two medical students were interviewed between August 2021 and May 2022 at the University of Mississippi Medical Center. Their interviews were transcribed and analyzed using deductive, inductive, and categorical coding methods to construct themes. These themes identified six influencing factors (personal identity; biases and assumptions; norms and expectations; language; episodic contexts; and comfort and trust) and one impact (evolution of personal identity). The relationships between these themes enabled the researchers to establish a preliminary model that demonstrates how medical students believe effective clinical communication occurs. Medical educators may use this model to develop innovative curricular objectives, assessment methods, and teaching strategies that might improve student's acquisition and demonstration of effective clinical communication. These improvements may be most beneficial for students who face minority stress, as well as those combating oppressive systems based on the complex relationships between their multiple minority identities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-025-10468-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-quality delivery of healthcare requires effective communication between patients and providers. Clinical communication has been a priority in medical education for decades, yet studies continue to show that trainees and providers struggle to communicate effectively in real and simulated clinical scenarios. Many have investigated potential methods to improve the initial acquisition, long-term retention, and holistic evaluation of clinical communication competency in medical trainees. However, there has been a lack of rigorous qualitative research investigating the medical student perspective on this process. This study aimed to identify medical student perceptions of what factors may influence effective clinical communication and how those factors evolve with time. Twenty-two medical students were interviewed between August 2021 and May 2022 at the University of Mississippi Medical Center. Their interviews were transcribed and analyzed using deductive, inductive, and categorical coding methods to construct themes. These themes identified six influencing factors (personal identity; biases and assumptions; norms and expectations; language; episodic contexts; and comfort and trust) and one impact (evolution of personal identity). The relationships between these themes enabled the researchers to establish a preliminary model that demonstrates how medical students believe effective clinical communication occurs. Medical educators may use this model to develop innovative curricular objectives, assessment methods, and teaching strategies that might improve student's acquisition and demonstration of effective clinical communication. These improvements may be most beneficial for students who face minority stress, as well as those combating oppressive systems based on the complex relationships between their multiple minority identities.

医学生对建立有效临床沟通的认知:一项质性研究。
提供高质量的医疗保健需要患者和提供者之间的有效沟通。几十年来,临床沟通一直是医学教育的重点,然而研究继续表明,实习生和提供者在真实和模拟临床场景中难以有效沟通。许多人已经研究了潜在的方法来提高医学实习生临床沟通能力的初始习得、长期保留和整体评估。然而,一直缺乏严谨的定性研究调查医学生对这一过程的看法。本研究旨在了解医学生对影响有效临床沟通的因素的认知,以及这些因素如何随时间演变。在2021年8月至2022年5月期间,22名医学生在密西西比大学医学中心接受了采访。他们的访谈记录和分析使用演绎,归纳和分类编码方法来构建主题。这些主题确定了六个影响因素(个人身份;偏见和假设;规范和期望;语言;情景语境;以及舒适和信任)和一个影响(个人身份的演变)。这些主题之间的关系使研究人员能够建立一个初步的模型,该模型展示了医学生如何相信有效的临床沟通发生。医学教育工作者可以利用这一模式来制定创新的课程目标、评估方法和教学策略,以提高学生对有效临床沟通的习得和展示。这些改进可能对那些面临少数民族压力的学生,以及那些与基于多个少数民族身份之间复杂关系的压迫制度作斗争的学生最为有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信