Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 in older adults with Parkinson's disease.

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hossein Soltaninejad, Ghorban Taghizadeh, Sayed Amir Hassan Habibi, Masoumeh Bayat, Farzaneh Fendereski, Reihaneh Akbari, Maryam Mehdizadeh
{"title":"Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 in older adults with Parkinson's disease.","authors":"Hossein Soltaninejad, Ghorban Taghizadeh, Sayed Amir Hassan Habibi, Masoumeh Bayat, Farzaneh Fendereski, Reihaneh Akbari, Maryam Mehdizadeh","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2547311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the Persian GDS-15 as a screening tool for depression in older adults with Parkinson's disease (PD), given its high prevalence and diagnostic challenges in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 160 older adults aged 65 years and above with a confirmed diagnosis of PD and 80 age-matched healthy controls. Participants completed the GDS-15, the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D), and the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach's alpha, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) (Test-retest reliability), and Pearson correlation coefficient. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal diagnostic cutoff score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exploratory factor analysis revealed a three-factor structure for the Persian GDS-15, demonstrating excellent reliability (α = 0.94; ICC = 0.92). Strong convergent validity was evidenced by significant correlations with HADS-D and BDI-II (both <i>p</i> < 0.001). ROC analysis established an optimal cutoff of ≤5, showing outstanding diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity = 98.7%, specificity = 84.7%) for depression detection in PD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Persian version of the GDS-15 is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing depression in older adults with PD and can be utilized in both clinical and research settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2547311","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the Persian GDS-15 as a screening tool for depression in older adults with Parkinson's disease (PD), given its high prevalence and diagnostic challenges in this population.

Methods: This study included 160 older adults aged 65 years and above with a confirmed diagnosis of PD and 80 age-matched healthy controls. Participants completed the GDS-15, the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D), and the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach's alpha, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) (Test-retest reliability), and Pearson correlation coefficient. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal diagnostic cutoff score.

Results: Exploratory factor analysis revealed a three-factor structure for the Persian GDS-15, demonstrating excellent reliability (α = 0.94; ICC = 0.92). Strong convergent validity was evidenced by significant correlations with HADS-D and BDI-II (both p < 0.001). ROC analysis established an optimal cutoff of ≤5, showing outstanding diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity = 98.7%, specificity = 84.7%) for depression detection in PD.

Conclusion: The Persian version of the GDS-15 is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing depression in older adults with PD and can be utilized in both clinical and research settings.

波斯语版老年抑郁量表-15在老年帕金森病患者中的效度和信度
目的:考虑到老年帕金森病(PD)的高患病率和诊断挑战,本研究评估了波斯GDS-15作为老年帕金森病(PD)抑郁症筛查工具的有效性和可靠性。方法:本研究包括160名65岁及以上确诊PD的老年人和80名年龄匹配的健康对照。参与者完成了GDS-15、医院焦虑与抑郁量表(HADS-D)的抑郁子量表和贝克抑郁量表- ii (BDI-II)。采用探索性因子分析(EFA)、验证性因子分析(CFA)、Cronbach’s alpha、类内相关系数(ICC)(重测信度)和Pearson相关系数对数据进行分析。此外,进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析以确定最佳诊断截止评分。结果:探索性因子分析显示波斯GDS-15具有三因子结构,具有良好的信度(α = 0.94;ICC = 0.92)。结论:波斯语版GDS-15是评估老年PD患者抑郁的一种可靠有效的工具,可用于临床和研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信