Joyce Z Wang, Elizabeth A Wojciechowski, Benjamin Shuman, Joshua Burns, Tegan L Cheng
{"title":"Mechanical testing methods for determining stiffness of ankle-foot orthoses: A scoping review.","authors":"Joyce Z Wang, Elizabeth A Wojciechowski, Benjamin Shuman, Joshua Burns, Tegan L Cheng","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stiffness of ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) has been assessed using many methods; however, results are unstandardized due to varied testing conditions such as range of motion and speed. Therefore, the aim of this scoping review was to provide a state-of-the-space review of the studies that investigate AFO ankle stiffness in the sagittal plane and then provide insight into the details of the developed devices and protocols. Six electronic databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, CINAHL, EMBASE, and IEEE Xplore) were searched for studies from when indexing began to April 2024. Articles of any design that developed or used testing devices and/or protocols to assess AFO ankle stiffness in the sagittal plane were eligible. Seventy-two articles were included in this review, of which 51 developed mechanical testing devices/protocols to quantify AFO stiffness while 21 articles referenced existing methods. The most common apparatuses used in the primary studies were the universal testing machine and customized manual machines. Other methods included specialty automated devices, manual devices in a gait analysis laboratory, hanging weights, universal testing machine combined with motion capture, muscle training machine, and 6-axis robot arm. Ankle angle of the AFO was the most common controlled variable, followed by loading force. This scoping review comprehensively outlines the variety of devices and protocols used to assess AFO ankle stiffness in the sagittal plane. Many researchers chose methods that leveraged their available resources, demonstrating a variety of approaches. For future studies, we recommend that parameters chosen are justified, reliability studies are undertaken, and AFO design is adequately reported.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000478","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Stiffness of ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) has been assessed using many methods; however, results are unstandardized due to varied testing conditions such as range of motion and speed. Therefore, the aim of this scoping review was to provide a state-of-the-space review of the studies that investigate AFO ankle stiffness in the sagittal plane and then provide insight into the details of the developed devices and protocols. Six electronic databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, CINAHL, EMBASE, and IEEE Xplore) were searched for studies from when indexing began to April 2024. Articles of any design that developed or used testing devices and/or protocols to assess AFO ankle stiffness in the sagittal plane were eligible. Seventy-two articles were included in this review, of which 51 developed mechanical testing devices/protocols to quantify AFO stiffness while 21 articles referenced existing methods. The most common apparatuses used in the primary studies were the universal testing machine and customized manual machines. Other methods included specialty automated devices, manual devices in a gait analysis laboratory, hanging weights, universal testing machine combined with motion capture, muscle training machine, and 6-axis robot arm. Ankle angle of the AFO was the most common controlled variable, followed by loading force. This scoping review comprehensively outlines the variety of devices and protocols used to assess AFO ankle stiffness in the sagittal plane. Many researchers chose methods that leveraged their available resources, demonstrating a variety of approaches. For future studies, we recommend that parameters chosen are justified, reliability studies are undertaken, and AFO design is adequately reported.
踝足矫形器(AFOs)的刚度评估方法很多;然而,由于不同的测试条件,如运动范围和速度,结果是不标准化的。因此,本综述的目的是对研究矢状面AFO踝关节僵硬的研究进行空间综述,然后对已开发的设备和方案的细节进行深入了解。检索了六个电子数据库(MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, CINAHL, EMBASE和IEEE Xplore)从索引开始到2024年4月的研究。开发或使用测试设备和/或方案来评估矢状面AFO踝关节僵硬的任何设计的文章均符合条件。本综述纳入72篇文章,其中51篇开发了量化AFO刚度的机械测试装置/方案,21篇引用了现有方法。在初步研究中最常用的仪器是通用试验机和定制手动试验机。其他方法包括专业自动化装置、步态分析实验室手动装置、吊重装置、结合动作捕捉的通用试验机、肌肉训练机和六轴机械臂。踝关节角度是最常见的控制变量,其次是加载力。本综述全面概述了用于评估矢状面AFO踝关节僵硬的各种设备和方案。许多研究人员选择了利用现有资源的方法,展示了各种各样的方法。对于未来的研究,我们建议选择合理的参数,进行可靠性研究,并充分报告AFO设计。
期刊介绍:
Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.