Engaged Medical Humanities-A Framework for Knowledge Production in Research Collaborations.

IF 0.9 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Louise Folker, Anna Lyngdal Wulff, Stig Bo Andersen, Line Steen Bygballe, Marie Gorm Aabo, Barbara Egilstrøð, Aske Juul Lassen, Astrid Pernille Jespersen
{"title":"Engaged Medical Humanities-A Framework for Knowledge Production in Research Collaborations.","authors":"Louise Folker, Anna Lyngdal Wulff, Stig Bo Andersen, Line Steen Bygballe, Marie Gorm Aabo, Barbara Egilstrøð, Aske Juul Lassen, Astrid Pernille Jespersen","doi":"10.1007/s10912-025-09976-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the field of medical humanities, there has been a general call to understand biocultural entanglements and to break down rigid distinctions between culture and health, as well as disciplinary boundaries. In line with this call, we suggest a medical humanities approach that further breaks down the distinction between basic and applied research. We conceptualize this approach as engaged medical humanities, as it both contributes to ongoing theoretical discussions and engages in empirical settings. Based on our ten-year practice of conducting medical humanities research at the Copenhagen Centre for Health Research in the Humanities (CoRe), and by zooming in on two collaborative research projects, we discuss how we realize and navigate these diverse engagements. On this basis, we offer a framework for conducting engaged medical humanities research to encourage and inspire future projects. First, we discuss how we take our main inspirations from the critical medical humanities and engaged research. Second, we identify several challenges that arise when our research approach is put into practice. We focus on our collaborations with stakeholders outside of academia, discussing how we navigate collaborative complexities while emphasizing the importance of empirical sensitivity and fluid accountabilities in studying health issues. Third, we discuss our knowledge production, encompassing various formats spanning both theoretical and conceptual contributions within academia, as well as practical interventions and instrumentation aimed at societal needs. Finally, we offer reflections on the potential we see in our framework and discuss the conditions for further developing the engaged medical humanities in a Scandinavian context.</p>","PeriodicalId":45518,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Humanities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-025-09976-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the field of medical humanities, there has been a general call to understand biocultural entanglements and to break down rigid distinctions between culture and health, as well as disciplinary boundaries. In line with this call, we suggest a medical humanities approach that further breaks down the distinction between basic and applied research. We conceptualize this approach as engaged medical humanities, as it both contributes to ongoing theoretical discussions and engages in empirical settings. Based on our ten-year practice of conducting medical humanities research at the Copenhagen Centre for Health Research in the Humanities (CoRe), and by zooming in on two collaborative research projects, we discuss how we realize and navigate these diverse engagements. On this basis, we offer a framework for conducting engaged medical humanities research to encourage and inspire future projects. First, we discuss how we take our main inspirations from the critical medical humanities and engaged research. Second, we identify several challenges that arise when our research approach is put into practice. We focus on our collaborations with stakeholders outside of academia, discussing how we navigate collaborative complexities while emphasizing the importance of empirical sensitivity and fluid accountabilities in studying health issues. Third, we discuss our knowledge production, encompassing various formats spanning both theoretical and conceptual contributions within academia, as well as practical interventions and instrumentation aimed at societal needs. Finally, we offer reflections on the potential we see in our framework and discuss the conditions for further developing the engaged medical humanities in a Scandinavian context.

参与医学人文——研究合作中的知识生产框架。
在医学人文领域,人们普遍呼吁理解生物文化的纠缠,打破文化与健康之间的严格区别,以及学科界限。根据这一呼吁,我们建议采用一种医学人文方法,进一步打破基础研究和应用研究之间的区别。我们将这种方法概念化为参与医学人文学科,因为它既有助于正在进行的理论讨论,也有助于经验设置。基于我们在哥本哈根人文健康研究中心(CoRe)开展医学人文研究的十年实践,并通过放大两个合作研究项目,我们讨论了我们如何实现和驾驭这些不同的参与。在此基础上,我们提供了一个框架来进行从事医学人文研究,以鼓励和启发未来的项目。首先,我们讨论了我们如何从关键的医学人文学科和从事研究中获得主要灵感。其次,我们确定了当我们的研究方法付诸实践时出现的几个挑战。我们专注于与学术界以外的利益相关者的合作,讨论我们如何应对合作的复杂性,同时强调在研究健康问题时经验敏感性和流动问责制的重要性。第三,我们讨论了我们的知识生产,包括学术界理论和概念贡献的各种形式,以及针对社会需求的实际干预和工具。最后,我们对我们在框架中看到的潜力进行了反思,并讨论了在斯堪的纳维亚背景下进一步发展从事医学人文学科的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Humanities
Journal of Medical Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Humanities publishes original papers that reflect its enlarged focus on interdisciplinary inquiry in medicine and medical education. Such inquiry can emerge in the following ways: (1) from the medical humanities, which includes literature, history, philosophy, and bioethics as well as those areas of the social and behavioral sciences that have strong humanistic traditions; (2) from cultural studies, a multidisciplinary activity involving the humanities; women''s, African-American, and other critical studies; media studies and popular culture; and sociology and anthropology, which can be used to examine medical institutions, practice and education with a special focus on relations of power; and (3) from pedagogical perspectives that elucidate what and how knowledge is made and valued in medicine, how that knowledge is expressed and transmitted, and the ideological basis of medical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信