WINFOCUS worldwide survey on central venous catheter insertion and position confirmation practices (CVC-ICON study).

IF 2.9 Q2 Medicine
Francesco Corradi, Giada Cucciolini, Guido Tavazzi, Adrian Wong, Cosmin Balan, Lawrence A Melniker, Arif Hussain, Julina Md Noor, Jacob John Bailey, Anselmo A Abdo Cuza, Alberto Goffi, Gabriele Via
{"title":"WINFOCUS worldwide survey on central venous catheter insertion and position confirmation practices (CVC-ICON study).","authors":"Francesco Corradi, Giada Cucciolini, Guido Tavazzi, Adrian Wong, Cosmin Balan, Lawrence A Melniker, Arif Hussain, Julina Md Noor, Jacob John Bailey, Anselmo A Abdo Cuza, Alberto Goffi, Gabriele Via","doi":"10.1186/s13089-025-00429-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Central venous catheters (CVC) are essential in medicine for monitoring, drug and fluid administration, and renal replacement therapy. Complications such as arrhythmias, endothelial damage, thrombosis, or hemothorax might arise from incorrect positioning. Despite evidence showing their reduction using ultrasound to guide insertion and correct tip positioning, and greater accuracy for tip position assessment vs. chest-X-ray (CXR), ultrasound adoption greatly varies worldwide. This study, conducted by the World Interactive Network Focused On Critical Ultrasound (WINFOCUS) aimed to assess global practices in CVC insertion and tip position confirmation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based survey was conducted (April-September 2023) among WINFOCUS members/affiliates across five continents. It assessed clinical backgrounds, CVC insertion and tip position check methods, and reasons for not using ultrasound. Developed by WINFOCUS Research sub-committee, the survey was emailed, with two reminders. Data were analyzed using SPSS 27.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,227 respondents (5.1% response rate) participated, mainly from Europe (33.5%), Asia (28.3%), and the Americas (30.9%), with 95.4% being physicians. Over half (51.3%) had over six years of experience and placed over 200 CVC, mostly using ultrasound guidance (70% of cases). The internal jugular vein (IJV) was the preferred insertion site (74%). Ultrasound was used for pre-insertion assessment (55%) and vessel puncture (57%) but less for guidewire confirmation (44%). CXR remained the primary method for tip position assessment (52%), while only 12% relied solely on bedside ultrasound. Barriers to exclusive ultrasound use included institutional guidelines (33.9%) and medico-legal concerns (13.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite evidence favoring ultrasound for CVC insertion and tip position confirmation, its use remains inconsistent, with CXR still widely used. This survey underscores the need for standardized protocols and training to enhance US adoption, improve patient safety, and reduce CXR reliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":36911,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12354427/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-025-00429-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Central venous catheters (CVC) are essential in medicine for monitoring, drug and fluid administration, and renal replacement therapy. Complications such as arrhythmias, endothelial damage, thrombosis, or hemothorax might arise from incorrect positioning. Despite evidence showing their reduction using ultrasound to guide insertion and correct tip positioning, and greater accuracy for tip position assessment vs. chest-X-ray (CXR), ultrasound adoption greatly varies worldwide. This study, conducted by the World Interactive Network Focused On Critical Ultrasound (WINFOCUS) aimed to assess global practices in CVC insertion and tip position confirmation.

Methods: A web-based survey was conducted (April-September 2023) among WINFOCUS members/affiliates across five continents. It assessed clinical backgrounds, CVC insertion and tip position check methods, and reasons for not using ultrasound. Developed by WINFOCUS Research sub-committee, the survey was emailed, with two reminders. Data were analyzed using SPSS 27.0.

Results: A total of 1,227 respondents (5.1% response rate) participated, mainly from Europe (33.5%), Asia (28.3%), and the Americas (30.9%), with 95.4% being physicians. Over half (51.3%) had over six years of experience and placed over 200 CVC, mostly using ultrasound guidance (70% of cases). The internal jugular vein (IJV) was the preferred insertion site (74%). Ultrasound was used for pre-insertion assessment (55%) and vessel puncture (57%) but less for guidewire confirmation (44%). CXR remained the primary method for tip position assessment (52%), while only 12% relied solely on bedside ultrasound. Barriers to exclusive ultrasound use included institutional guidelines (33.9%) and medico-legal concerns (13.8%).

Conclusions: Despite evidence favoring ultrasound for CVC insertion and tip position confirmation, its use remains inconsistent, with CXR still widely used. This survey underscores the need for standardized protocols and training to enhance US adoption, improve patient safety, and reduce CXR reliance.

WINFOCUS全球中心静脉导管插入和位置确认实践调查(CVC-ICON研究)。
背景:中心静脉导管(CVC)在医学监测、药物和液体给药以及肾脏替代治疗中是必不可少的。不正确的体位可能引起心律失常、内皮损伤、血栓形成或血胸等并发症。尽管有证据表明使用超声引导插入和正确的尖端定位可以减少其数量,并且与胸部x光片(CXR)相比,超声评估尖端位置的准确性更高,但全球范围内超声的采用差异很大。本研究由世界关键超声互动网络(WINFOCUS)进行,旨在评估CVC插入和尖端位置确认的全球实践。方法:于2023年4月至9月在五大洲的WINFOCUS成员/附属机构中进行了一项基于网络的调查。评估临床背景、CVC插入和针尖位置检查方法以及不使用超声的原因。该调查由WINFOCUS Research小组委员会开发,并通过电子邮件发送,附带两项提醒。数据采用SPSS 27.0进行分析。结果:共有1227名受访者参与,回复率为5.1%,主要来自欧洲(33.5%)、亚洲(28.3%)和美洲(30.9%),其中95.4%为医生。超过半数(51.3%)有6年以上的经验,放置了200个以上的CVC,大多数使用超声引导(70%的病例)。颈内静脉(IJV)是首选的插入部位(74%)。超声用于插入前评估(55%)和血管穿刺(57%),但较少用于导丝确认(44%)。CXR仍然是评估尖端位置的主要方法(52%),而仅12%依赖床边超声。仅使用超声波的障碍包括机构指南(33.9%)和医学法律问题(13.8%)。结论:尽管有证据表明超声有利于CVC的插入和针尖位置的确认,但其使用仍不一致,CXR仍被广泛使用。这项调查强调了标准化方案和培训的必要性,以提高美国的采用率,改善患者安全,并减少对CXR的依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasound Journal
Ultrasound Journal Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
45
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信