[Structure and Metabolic Function Characteristics of Soil Bacterial Communities under Different Vegetation Types in Arid Region].

Q2 Environmental Science
Fang-Jiao An, Zi-Ru Niu, Ting-Na Liu, Yong-Zhong Su
{"title":"[Structure and Metabolic Function Characteristics of Soil Bacterial Communities under Different Vegetation Types in Arid Region].","authors":"Fang-Jiao An, Zi-Ru Niu, Ting-Na Liu, Yong-Zhong Su","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202407230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to explore the effects of different vegetation types on soil bacterial community structure and metabolic function in an oasis-desert ecotone and provide scientific theoretical basis for species allocation and management of vegetation reconstruction in arid desert ecosystem. <i>Nitraria sphaerocarpa</i> Maxim and <i>Calligonum mongolicum</i> Turcz are the main natural vegetation, <i>Haloxylon ammodendron</i> Bunge, and <i>Hedysarum scoparium</i> Fisch are the primary artificial vegetation, and Ha-Cm are the main mixed community in an oasis-desert ecotone in northwest China. Understanding soil microbial community structure and function under typical vegetation types is crucial for accurate management and sustainable use of desert vegetation. We used high-throughput sequencing technology to explore the effects of different vegetation types on the structure, diversity, and metabolic pathways of soil bacteria and to investigate the key factors driving the change of soil bacterial community structure. The results showed that the growth of artificial vegetation and natural vegetation significantly increased the richness and diversity of the soil bacterial community, but no significant difference was observed. Metagenomic analysis showed that the same dominant bacterial phyla existed in all soils, but the proportions were different. Actinobacteriota, Proteobacteria, and Chloroflexi were the absolute dominant bacterial phyla, accounting for 65.12%-78.68% of the total bacteria. Principal co-ordinates analysis showed significant differences in soil bacterial community structure in the planted forest but similarities in the natural forest. The metabolic pathways of soil bacteria in different vegetation communities were similar. Soil organic carbon (SOC), available phosphorus (AP), and pH were important abiotic factors affecting the functional structure of bacteria. The findings are helpful for furthering the understanding of plant-soil interaction in ecologically fragile deserts.</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"环境科学","volume":"46 8","pages":"5360-5368"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202407230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the effects of different vegetation types on soil bacterial community structure and metabolic function in an oasis-desert ecotone and provide scientific theoretical basis for species allocation and management of vegetation reconstruction in arid desert ecosystem. Nitraria sphaerocarpa Maxim and Calligonum mongolicum Turcz are the main natural vegetation, Haloxylon ammodendron Bunge, and Hedysarum scoparium Fisch are the primary artificial vegetation, and Ha-Cm are the main mixed community in an oasis-desert ecotone in northwest China. Understanding soil microbial community structure and function under typical vegetation types is crucial for accurate management and sustainable use of desert vegetation. We used high-throughput sequencing technology to explore the effects of different vegetation types on the structure, diversity, and metabolic pathways of soil bacteria and to investigate the key factors driving the change of soil bacterial community structure. The results showed that the growth of artificial vegetation and natural vegetation significantly increased the richness and diversity of the soil bacterial community, but no significant difference was observed. Metagenomic analysis showed that the same dominant bacterial phyla existed in all soils, but the proportions were different. Actinobacteriota, Proteobacteria, and Chloroflexi were the absolute dominant bacterial phyla, accounting for 65.12%-78.68% of the total bacteria. Principal co-ordinates analysis showed significant differences in soil bacterial community structure in the planted forest but similarities in the natural forest. The metabolic pathways of soil bacteria in different vegetation communities were similar. Soil organic carbon (SOC), available phosphorus (AP), and pH were important abiotic factors affecting the functional structure of bacteria. The findings are helpful for furthering the understanding of plant-soil interaction in ecologically fragile deserts.

干旱区不同植被类型土壤细菌群落结构与代谢功能特征[j]。
本研究旨在探讨不同植被类型对绿洲-荒漠过渡带土壤细菌群落结构和代谢功能的影响,为干旱荒漠生态系统植被重建的物种配置和管理提供科学的理论依据。在西北绿洲-荒漠交错带,白刺和沙棘是主要的天然植被,梭梭和刺槐是主要的人工植被,Ha-Cm是主要的混合群落。了解典型植被类型下土壤微生物群落结构和功能,对荒漠植被的精准管理和可持续利用具有重要意义。利用高通量测序技术,探讨不同植被类型对土壤细菌结构、多样性和代谢途径的影响,探讨土壤细菌群落结构变化的关键驱动因素。结果表明:人工植被与天然植被的生长均显著增加了土壤细菌群落的丰富度和多样性,但差异不显著;宏基因组分析表明,所有土壤均存在相同的优势菌门,但所占比例不同。放线菌门、变形菌门和绿菌门是绝对优势菌门,占总菌数的65.12% ~ 78.68%。主坐标分析表明,人工林土壤细菌群落结构差异显著,天然林土壤细菌群落结构相似。不同植被群落土壤细菌代谢途径相似。土壤有机碳(SOC)、速效磷(AP)和pH是影响细菌功能结构的重要非生物因子。研究结果有助于进一步认识生态脆弱沙漠植物与土壤的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
环境科学
环境科学 Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15329
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信