[Analysis of discordant results between multiplex fluorescence PCR-capillary electrophoresis for microsatellite instability (MSI) detection and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression in gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma].

Q3 Medicine
Y J Gu, H M Xu, Q Y Li, F Yuan, L Dong, C F Wang
{"title":"[Analysis of discordant results between multiplex fluorescence PCR-capillary electrophoresis for microsatellite instability (MSI) detection and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression in gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma].","authors":"Y J Gu, H M Xu, Q Y Li, F Yuan, L Dong, C F Wang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20241031-00469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study investigated the underlying causes of discordance between multiplex fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-capillary electrophoresis in determining MSI and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair (MMR) protein evaluation in gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas, aiming to improve interpretation accuracy and guide clinical precision treatment strategies. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis was conducted on 511 surgically resected or biopsied specimens (161 gastric adenocarcinomas and 350 colorectal adenocarcinomas) diagnosed at the Department of Pathology, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from January to June 2024. MMR protein expression of tumors was evaluated by IHC, while MSI status was assessed using the 2B3D National Cancer Institute (NCI) Panel through multiplex fluorescence PCR-capillary electrophoresis on tumor DNA and matched normal DNA. The concordance between the two methods was analyzed, and factors contributing to the discordance were investigated. Cases with unstable dinucleotide loci only in the 2B3D NCI Panel, focal MMR protein loss, or unexplained discrepancies underwent validation using the non-NCI Panel through multiplex fluorescence PCR-capillary electrophoresis markers or next-generation sequencing (NGS). <b>Results:</b> In the 511 gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas, the results of the two methods were discordant in 15 cases (2.9%), with a significantly higher discordantrate in gastric cancers (7.5%, 12/161) compared to colorectal cancers (0.9%, 3/350; <i>P</i><0.001). Key contributors to the discordance included: sampling limitations (6 cases), 2B3D NCI Panel design constraints (3 cases),tumor heterogeneity (3 cases),isolated MSH6 deficiency (1 case),and unexplained discrepancies (2 cases).Validation studies demonstrated that cases with dinucleotide-only instability showed concordance with IHC after using the non-NCI Panel through multiplex fluorescence PCR-capillary electrophoresis and NGS verifications. Specimens with focal MMR protein loss and unexplained discrepancies aligned with initial PCR results upon NGS validation. Unexplained cases harbored Kirsten rat sarcoma class Ⅰ variants and multiple class Ⅱ genetic alterations. <b>Conclusions:</b> Colorectal adenocarcinoma demonstrated higher concordance between PCR-capillary electrophoresis and IHC than gastric adenocarcinoma.Discordant results require systematic evaluation including technical review, specimen quality control, and supplemental NGS analysis to resolve discrepancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":39868,"journal":{"name":"中华肿瘤杂志","volume":"47 8","pages":"715-725"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华肿瘤杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20241031-00469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated the underlying causes of discordance between multiplex fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-capillary electrophoresis in determining MSI and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair (MMR) protein evaluation in gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas, aiming to improve interpretation accuracy and guide clinical precision treatment strategies. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 511 surgically resected or biopsied specimens (161 gastric adenocarcinomas and 350 colorectal adenocarcinomas) diagnosed at the Department of Pathology, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from January to June 2024. MMR protein expression of tumors was evaluated by IHC, while MSI status was assessed using the 2B3D National Cancer Institute (NCI) Panel through multiplex fluorescence PCR-capillary electrophoresis on tumor DNA and matched normal DNA. The concordance between the two methods was analyzed, and factors contributing to the discordance were investigated. Cases with unstable dinucleotide loci only in the 2B3D NCI Panel, focal MMR protein loss, or unexplained discrepancies underwent validation using the non-NCI Panel through multiplex fluorescence PCR-capillary electrophoresis markers or next-generation sequencing (NGS). Results: In the 511 gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas, the results of the two methods were discordant in 15 cases (2.9%), with a significantly higher discordantrate in gastric cancers (7.5%, 12/161) compared to colorectal cancers (0.9%, 3/350; P<0.001). Key contributors to the discordance included: sampling limitations (6 cases), 2B3D NCI Panel design constraints (3 cases),tumor heterogeneity (3 cases),isolated MSH6 deficiency (1 case),and unexplained discrepancies (2 cases).Validation studies demonstrated that cases with dinucleotide-only instability showed concordance with IHC after using the non-NCI Panel through multiplex fluorescence PCR-capillary electrophoresis and NGS verifications. Specimens with focal MMR protein loss and unexplained discrepancies aligned with initial PCR results upon NGS validation. Unexplained cases harbored Kirsten rat sarcoma class Ⅰ variants and multiple class Ⅱ genetic alterations. Conclusions: Colorectal adenocarcinoma demonstrated higher concordance between PCR-capillary electrophoresis and IHC than gastric adenocarcinoma.Discordant results require systematic evaluation including technical review, specimen quality control, and supplemental NGS analysis to resolve discrepancies.

[多重荧光pcr -毛细管电泳检测微卫星不稳定性(MSI)与免疫组织化学(IHC)检测错配修复(MMR)蛋白表达的不一致结果分析]。
目的:探讨多重荧光聚合酶链反应(PCR)-毛细管电泳测定胃肠道腺癌MSI与免疫组织化学(IHC)错配修复(MMR)蛋白评价不一致的潜在原因,旨在提高解释准确性,指导临床精准治疗策略。方法:回顾性分析上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院病理科2024年1 - 6月确诊的511例手术切除或活检标本(胃腺癌161例,结直肠腺癌350例)。采用免疫组化法(IHC)检测肿瘤组织中MMR蛋白的表达,采用2B3D美国国家癌症研究所(NCI)面板对肿瘤DNA和匹配的正常DNA进行多重荧光pcr -毛细管电泳检测MSI状态。分析了两种方法的一致性,并探讨了造成不一致性的因素。仅在2B3D NCI面板中存在不稳定二核苷酸位点、局灶性MMR蛋白丢失或无法解释的差异的病例,通过多重荧光pcr -毛细管电泳标记或下一代测序(NGS)使用非NCI面板进行验证。结果:在511例胃肠道腺癌中,两种方法结果不一致的有15例(2.9%),其中胃癌(7.5%,12/161)的不一致率显著高于结直肠癌(0.9%,3/350;P < 0.001)。导致不一致的主要因素包括:抽样限制(6例)、2B3D NCI面板设计限制(3例)、肿瘤异质性(3例)、孤立的MSH6缺乏(1例)和无法解释的差异(2例)。验证研究表明,通过多重荧光pcr -毛细管电泳和NGS验证,使用非nci面板后,仅二核苷酸不稳定的病例与免疫组化一致。局灶性MMR蛋白丢失和不明原因差异的标本与NGS验证后的初始PCR结果一致。不明原因的病例包含Kirsten大鼠肉瘤类Ⅰ变异和多类Ⅱ遗传改变。结论:大肠腺癌的pcr -毛细管电泳和免疫组化结果的一致性高于胃腺癌。不一致的结果需要系统的评估,包括技术审查、标本质量控制和补充的NGS分析来解决差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华肿瘤杂志
中华肿瘤杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10433
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信