"A good physician works full-time?" - a mixed-methods study on (mis)conceptions about part-time work in hospitals.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Barbara Jarmila Germann, Julia Frey, Alain Soltermann, Janna Küllenberg
{"title":"\"A good physician works full-time?\" - a mixed-methods study on (mis)conceptions about part-time work in hospitals.","authors":"Barbara Jarmila Germann, Julia Frey, Alain Soltermann, Janna Küllenberg","doi":"10.57187/s.4205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study aims: </strong>While part-time employment is commonly discussed as a way to recruit and retain physicians, the average workload of hospital physicians has barely decreased in the past decade, and hospitals face persistent difficulties in adopting part-time work. This study aims to examine the attitudes of hospital physicians across various specialties and positions towards part-time employment, and to identify factors that hinder or facilitate the successful implementation of part-time arrangements in hospital settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an exploratory mixed-method study, combining a qualitative interview study with reflexive thematic analysis of 19 participants, and an online quantitative survey of 553 physicians. Data were collected between August and November 2023 in seven public hospital organisations in Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The quantitative data revealed a widespread desire for workload reduction across all roles, specialties, age groups and sexes, with an average ideal workload of 81%. Contrary to some statements in the qualitative interviews, the youngest cohort of physicians reported the highest ideal workload (88%). Most respondents (60%) believed they would be granted a workload reduction, yet an equal percentage at least partially agreed that working part-time would negatively impact advancement opportunities within the hospital. Other concerns about part-time work included the additional workload it might place on colleagues (76.5%) and a potential decline in medical quality (17.5%). These concerns varied across specialties and positions. The qualitative interviews identified both organisational and cultural barriers to the implementation of part-time work for hospital physicians, such as complex scheduling, additional effort and the prevailing \"ideal physician norm\" that prioritises physical presence and professional obligations over personal life. Conversely, factors facilitating part-time work included a supportive culture for part-time models and flexible organisational structures and processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Addressing current perceptions of physicians' part-time work may be an essential first step towards establishing sustainable part-time solutions in hospitals. This includes the assumption that a physician's competence depends solely on his or her availability. Furthermore, the redesign of workplace structures, including shift schedules and training programmes, may be necessary to accommodate varying workloads. When accommodating part-time solutions for hospital physicians, implementing one-size-fits-all solutions may not be expedient, given the varying circumstances of different specialties and positions. Therefore, we recommend that solutions be tailored to the specific needs of each clinic and developed through a participatory process.</p>","PeriodicalId":22111,"journal":{"name":"Swiss medical weekly","volume":"155 ","pages":"4205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss medical weekly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57187/s.4205","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study aims: While part-time employment is commonly discussed as a way to recruit and retain physicians, the average workload of hospital physicians has barely decreased in the past decade, and hospitals face persistent difficulties in adopting part-time work. This study aims to examine the attitudes of hospital physicians across various specialties and positions towards part-time employment, and to identify factors that hinder or facilitate the successful implementation of part-time arrangements in hospital settings.

Methods: We conducted an exploratory mixed-method study, combining a qualitative interview study with reflexive thematic analysis of 19 participants, and an online quantitative survey of 553 physicians. Data were collected between August and November 2023 in seven public hospital organisations in Switzerland.

Results: The quantitative data revealed a widespread desire for workload reduction across all roles, specialties, age groups and sexes, with an average ideal workload of 81%. Contrary to some statements in the qualitative interviews, the youngest cohort of physicians reported the highest ideal workload (88%). Most respondents (60%) believed they would be granted a workload reduction, yet an equal percentage at least partially agreed that working part-time would negatively impact advancement opportunities within the hospital. Other concerns about part-time work included the additional workload it might place on colleagues (76.5%) and a potential decline in medical quality (17.5%). These concerns varied across specialties and positions. The qualitative interviews identified both organisational and cultural barriers to the implementation of part-time work for hospital physicians, such as complex scheduling, additional effort and the prevailing "ideal physician norm" that prioritises physical presence and professional obligations over personal life. Conversely, factors facilitating part-time work included a supportive culture for part-time models and flexible organisational structures and processes.

Conclusion: Addressing current perceptions of physicians' part-time work may be an essential first step towards establishing sustainable part-time solutions in hospitals. This includes the assumption that a physician's competence depends solely on his or her availability. Furthermore, the redesign of workplace structures, including shift schedules and training programmes, may be necessary to accommodate varying workloads. When accommodating part-time solutions for hospital physicians, implementing one-size-fits-all solutions may not be expedient, given the varying circumstances of different specialties and positions. Therefore, we recommend that solutions be tailored to the specific needs of each clinic and developed through a participatory process.

“一个好的医生是全职的吗?”-对医院非全时工作(错误)观念的混合方法研究。
研究目的:虽然兼职被普遍认为是一种招聘和留住医生的方式,但在过去的十年里,医院医生的平均工作量几乎没有减少,医院在采用兼职工作方面面临着持续的困难。本研究旨在调查不同专业和职位的医院医生对兼职工作的态度,并找出阻碍或促进兼职安排在医院成功实施的因素。方法:采用探索性混合方法,对19名参与者进行定性访谈研究和反身性主题分析相结合,并对553名医生进行在线定量调查。数据于2023年8月至11月在瑞士的7家公立医院组织中收集。结果:定量数据显示,所有角色、专业、年龄组和性别都希望减少工作量,平均理想工作量为81%。与定性访谈中的一些陈述相反,最年轻的医生队列报告了最高的理想工作量(88%)。大多数受访者(60%)认为他们的工作量会减少,但同样比例的受访者至少部分同意兼职会对医院内部的晋升机会产生负面影响。对兼职工作的其他担忧包括可能给同事带来额外的工作量(76.5%)和可能降低医疗质量(17.5%)。这些担忧因专业和职位而异。定性访谈确定了医院医生实施兼职工作的组织和文化障碍,例如复杂的日程安排、额外的工作量和普遍存在的“理想医生规范”,即将实际存在和专业义务置于个人生活之上。相反,促进兼职工作的因素包括对兼职模式的支持文化和灵活的组织结构和流程。结论:解决目前对医生兼职工作的看法可能是在医院建立可持续兼职解决方案的重要的第一步。这包括一个假设,即医生的能力完全取决于他或她的可用性。此外,可能需要重新设计工作场所结构,包括轮班时间表和培训方案,以适应不同的工作量。在为医院医生提供兼职解决方案时,考虑到不同专业和职位的不同情况,实施一刀切的解决方案可能不是权宜之计。因此,我们建议解决方案应根据每个诊所的具体需求量身定制,并通过参与性过程进行开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Swiss medical weekly
Swiss medical weekly 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Swiss Medical Weekly accepts for consideration original and review articles from all fields of medicine. The quality of SMW publications is guaranteed by a consistent policy of rigorous single-blind peer review. All editorial decisions are made by research-active academics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信