Alberto Bellelli, Valerio D'Andrea, Matteo Pileri, Bruno Beomonte Zobel
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of CT-guided oxygen-ozone (O<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub>) therapy for low back pain: a retrospective single-center study.","authors":"Alberto Bellelli, Valerio D'Andrea, Matteo Pileri, Bruno Beomonte Zobel","doi":"10.1007/s11547-025-02071-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Oxygen-ozone (O<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub>) therapy is increasingly recognized as a minimally invasive option for managing low back pain (LBP). This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of CT-guided O<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub> injections, both as a standalone therapy and in combination with other medications, across a diverse cohort of patients with LBP.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center retrospective observational study of patients with LBP who underwent CT-guided O<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub> intradiscal and/or facet joint injections between January 2016 and March 2017. Patients were categorized into three groups: Group A (facet joint osteoarthritis), Group B (single-level disc herniation with unilateral sciatica), and Group C (double-level disc herniation with bilateral or unilateral sciatica). Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline and three weeks after the final injection. Statistical analysis included paired t-tests for pre- and post-treatment comparisons and one-way ANOVA with Tukey's HSD for group comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 123 patients were included. The mean baseline VAS score for the entire cohort was 7.5 ± 1.2, which significantly decreased to 3.5 ± 1.5 following treatment (T = 43.74, p < 0.001). In Group A, the mean VAS decreased from 7.2 ± 1.3 to 3.8 ± 1.4; in Group B, from 7.8 ± 1.0 to 3.2 ± 1.3; and in Group C, from 8.0 ± 0.9 to 3.0 ± 1.2. ANOVA revealed significant differences in post-treatment VAS scores among groups (F = 27.36, p < 0.001). Tukey's HSD indicated significant differences between Groups A and B (p < 0.001) and A and C (p < 0.001), with no significant difference between Groups B and C (p = 0.247). Overall, 21.95% of patients experienced significant improvement (VAS reduction > 4 points), 57.72% had moderate improvement (VAS reduction 2-4 points), and 18.7% showed minimal improvement (VAS reduction ≤ 1 point). No complications were reported during or after the procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings strongly support the efficacy and safety of O<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub> therapy for the treatment of LBP, offering significant short-term pain relief across diverse patient subgroups. Further controlled studies are warranted to confirm long-term efficacy and optimize treatment protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":20817,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia Medica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-025-02071-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Oxygen-ozone (O2-O3) therapy is increasingly recognized as a minimally invasive option for managing low back pain (LBP). This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of CT-guided O2-O3 injections, both as a standalone therapy and in combination with other medications, across a diverse cohort of patients with LBP.
Materials and methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective observational study of patients with LBP who underwent CT-guided O2-O3 intradiscal and/or facet joint injections between January 2016 and March 2017. Patients were categorized into three groups: Group A (facet joint osteoarthritis), Group B (single-level disc herniation with unilateral sciatica), and Group C (double-level disc herniation with bilateral or unilateral sciatica). Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline and three weeks after the final injection. Statistical analysis included paired t-tests for pre- and post-treatment comparisons and one-way ANOVA with Tukey's HSD for group comparisons.
Results: A total of 123 patients were included. The mean baseline VAS score for the entire cohort was 7.5 ± 1.2, which significantly decreased to 3.5 ± 1.5 following treatment (T = 43.74, p < 0.001). In Group A, the mean VAS decreased from 7.2 ± 1.3 to 3.8 ± 1.4; in Group B, from 7.8 ± 1.0 to 3.2 ± 1.3; and in Group C, from 8.0 ± 0.9 to 3.0 ± 1.2. ANOVA revealed significant differences in post-treatment VAS scores among groups (F = 27.36, p < 0.001). Tukey's HSD indicated significant differences between Groups A and B (p < 0.001) and A and C (p < 0.001), with no significant difference between Groups B and C (p = 0.247). Overall, 21.95% of patients experienced significant improvement (VAS reduction > 4 points), 57.72% had moderate improvement (VAS reduction 2-4 points), and 18.7% showed minimal improvement (VAS reduction ≤ 1 point). No complications were reported during or after the procedures.
Conclusion: The findings strongly support the efficacy and safety of O2-O3 therapy for the treatment of LBP, offering significant short-term pain relief across diverse patient subgroups. Further controlled studies are warranted to confirm long-term efficacy and optimize treatment protocols.
期刊介绍：
Felice Perussia founded La radiologia medica in 1914. It is a peer-reviewed journal and serves as the official journal of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM). The primary purpose of the journal is to disseminate information related to Radiology, especially advancements in diagnostic imaging and related disciplines. La radiologia medica welcomes original research on both fundamental and clinical aspects of modern radiology, with a particular focus on diagnostic and interventional imaging techniques. It also covers topics such as radiotherapy, nuclear medicine, radiobiology, health physics, and artificial intelligence in the context of clinical implications. The journal includes various types of contributions such as original articles, review articles, editorials, short reports, and letters to the editor. With an esteemed Editorial Board and a selection of insightful reports, the journal is an indispensable resource for radiologists and professionals in related fields. Ultimately, La radiologia medica aims to serve as a platform for international collaboration and knowledge sharing within the radiological community.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
