Abdominal Peripheral Nerve Blocks Do Not Impact Postoperative Pain in Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Zain Aryanpour, Ansley Wallace, Julian Winocour, David W Mathes, Christodoulos Kaoutzanis, Katie G Egan
{"title":"Abdominal Peripheral Nerve Blocks Do Not Impact Postoperative Pain in Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.","authors":"Zain Aryanpour, Ansley Wallace, Julian Winocour, David W Mathes, Christodoulos Kaoutzanis, Katie G Egan","doi":"10.1055/a-2671-4007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transverse abdominis plane (TAP) and rectus sheath (RS) blocks are utilized in enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, but with highly variable methodologies and outcomes in reported literature. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of abdominal peripheral nerve blocks in free flap breast reconstruction as they pertain to postoperative pain medication requirements and hospital length of stay (LOS).Retrospective review was conducted on patients undergoing breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric artery perforator free flaps at a large academic institution. Target variables included history of chronic pain diagnosis, laterality, and nerve block type (TAP or RS). Outcomes included daily and total opioid oral morphine milligram equivalents on postoperative days one to three. Patient cohorts were analyzed by TAP block, RS block, or no block. Blocks were performed intraoperatively by the surgical team.Between 2021 and 2023, 225 patients met the inclusion criteria; 87 received TAP blocks, 72 received RS blocks, and 66 received no block. Patients with chronic pain diagnoses who underwent bilateral reconstruction had higher total postoperative opioid requirements. There were no significant differences in hospital LOS or postoperative pain medication requirements between the three groups before or after controlling for multiple co-variables.In this large cohort of abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction patients, there was no impact of peripheral nerve block or nerve block type on postoperative pain medication requirement or hospital LOS. Bilateral flap reconstruction and a history of chronic pain diagnoses were the only factors found to affect perioperative opioid utilization in patients undergoing abdominally based breast reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2671-4007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transverse abdominis plane (TAP) and rectus sheath (RS) blocks are utilized in enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, but with highly variable methodologies and outcomes in reported literature. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of abdominal peripheral nerve blocks in free flap breast reconstruction as they pertain to postoperative pain medication requirements and hospital length of stay (LOS).Retrospective review was conducted on patients undergoing breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric artery perforator free flaps at a large academic institution. Target variables included history of chronic pain diagnosis, laterality, and nerve block type (TAP or RS). Outcomes included daily and total opioid oral morphine milligram equivalents on postoperative days one to three. Patient cohorts were analyzed by TAP block, RS block, or no block. Blocks were performed intraoperatively by the surgical team.Between 2021 and 2023, 225 patients met the inclusion criteria; 87 received TAP blocks, 72 received RS blocks, and 66 received no block. Patients with chronic pain diagnoses who underwent bilateral reconstruction had higher total postoperative opioid requirements. There were no significant differences in hospital LOS or postoperative pain medication requirements between the three groups before or after controlling for multiple co-variables.In this large cohort of abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction patients, there was no impact of peripheral nerve block or nerve block type on postoperative pain medication requirement or hospital LOS. Bilateral flap reconstruction and a history of chronic pain diagnoses were the only factors found to affect perioperative opioid utilization in patients undergoing abdominally based breast reconstruction.

腹外周神经阻滞对游离皮瓣乳房再造术术后疼痛无影响。
横腹平面(TAP)和直肌鞘(RS)阻滞用于增强手术后恢复,但在文献报道中方法和结果差异很大。本研究的目的是评估腹周围神经阻滞在自由皮瓣乳房重建中的疗效,因为它们与术后止痛药需求和住院时间(LOS)有关。对某大型学术机构应用腹下深动脉穿支游离皮瓣行乳房再造术的患者进行回顾性分析。目标变量包括慢性疼痛诊断史、侧边性和神经阻滞类型(TAP或RS)。结果包括术后第1至3天每日和总阿片类口服吗啡毫克当量。患者队列采用TAP分组、RS分组或无分组进行分析。手术组在术中进行阻滞。2021年至2023年间,225例患者符合纳入标准;87个接收到TAP区块,72个接收到RS区块,66个没有接收到区块。接受双侧重建的慢性疼痛患者术后总阿片类药物需求较高。在控制多个协变量之前或之后,三组之间的医院LOS和术后止痛药需求无显著差异。在这个基于腹部的自由皮瓣乳房重建患者的大队列中,周围神经阻滞或神经阻滞类型对术后止痛药需求或医院LOS没有影响。双侧皮瓣重建和慢性疼痛诊断史是影响腹部乳房重建患者围手术期阿片类药物使用的唯一因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信