Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Pharmacist-Driven Warfarin Consult Service Versus Physician Management in a Tertiary Community Hospital.

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Erik Wasowski, Anne Harris, Taylor Elias
{"title":"Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Pharmacist-Driven Warfarin Consult Service Versus Physician Management in a Tertiary Community Hospital.","authors":"Erik Wasowski, Anne Harris, Taylor Elias","doi":"10.1177/87551225251363438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The use of warfarin is complicated by a narrow therapeutic window, requiring close monitoring to prevent serious adverse events. Literature has shown that pharmacist-led warfarin management improves patient outcomes and decreases hospitalization length of stay. This study assessed the impact of the recently implemented pharmacist-driven warfarin consult service at 3 hospitals within the Cleveland Clinic Health System. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective, multi-centered study which included 64 adult patients admitted to Cleveland Clinic Hospitals between June 1, 2023, and July 31, 2024 who received at least 3 doses of warfarin. Exclusion criteria included an elevated international normalized ratio (INR) upon admission, argatroban use, active cancer, or warfarin ordered by both managing services. <b>Results:</b> The primary outcome, rate of supratherapeutic INR values, did not significantly differ between groups (<i>P</i> = .84). In addition, the secondary outcomes including rate of subtherapeutic INRs, INR ≥0.7 within 24 hours, therapeutic INR at discharge, and major bleeding showed no significant difference. However, pharmacists were twice as likely to order an initial starting dose of <5 mg compared to physicians (62.5% vs 31.3%). In addition, physician-managed patients were observed more frequently for the INR ≥0.7 within 24 hours (11 vs 4 events). <b>Conclusion:</b> Overall, there was not a significant difference found in patient outcomes when comparing pharmacist versus physician warfarin management. Future studies with a larger sample size are needed to explore the potential differences in dosing regimens and its effect on the rate of significant INR elevations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":" ","pages":"87551225251363438"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12343540/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225251363438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of warfarin is complicated by a narrow therapeutic window, requiring close monitoring to prevent serious adverse events. Literature has shown that pharmacist-led warfarin management improves patient outcomes and decreases hospitalization length of stay. This study assessed the impact of the recently implemented pharmacist-driven warfarin consult service at 3 hospitals within the Cleveland Clinic Health System. Methods: This was a retrospective, multi-centered study which included 64 adult patients admitted to Cleveland Clinic Hospitals between June 1, 2023, and July 31, 2024 who received at least 3 doses of warfarin. Exclusion criteria included an elevated international normalized ratio (INR) upon admission, argatroban use, active cancer, or warfarin ordered by both managing services. Results: The primary outcome, rate of supratherapeutic INR values, did not significantly differ between groups (P = .84). In addition, the secondary outcomes including rate of subtherapeutic INRs, INR ≥0.7 within 24 hours, therapeutic INR at discharge, and major bleeding showed no significant difference. However, pharmacists were twice as likely to order an initial starting dose of <5 mg compared to physicians (62.5% vs 31.3%). In addition, physician-managed patients were observed more frequently for the INR ≥0.7 within 24 hours (11 vs 4 events). Conclusion: Overall, there was not a significant difference found in patient outcomes when comparing pharmacist versus physician warfarin management. Future studies with a larger sample size are needed to explore the potential differences in dosing regimens and its effect on the rate of significant INR elevations.

评价三级社区医院药师主导的华法林咨询服务与医师管理的有效性
背景:华法林的使用是复杂的狭窄的治疗窗口,需要密切监测,以防止严重的不良事件。文献表明,药剂师主导的华法林管理改善了患者的预后,缩短了住院时间。本研究评估了最近在克利夫兰诊所卫生系统内的3家医院实施的药剂师驱动的华法林咨询服务的影响。方法:这是一项回顾性的多中心研究,纳入了2023年6月1日至2024年7月31日期间在克利夫兰诊所医院接受至少3剂华法林治疗的64名成年患者。排除标准包括入院时国际标准化比率(INR)升高、阿加曲班使用、活动性癌症或两家管理机构均责令华法林。结果:两组间主要转归,超治疗INR值率无显著差异(P = 0.84)。此外,亚治疗性INR率、24小时内INR≥0.7、出院时治疗性INR、大出血等次要结局无显著差异。然而,药剂师订购初始起始剂量的可能性是医生的两倍。结论:总的来说,在比较药剂师和医生使用华法林的结果时,没有发现显著差异。未来需要更大样本量的研究来探索给药方案的潜在差异及其对显著INR升高率的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信